In online learning during this pandemic, pre-service mathematics teachers’ engagement is the key to success in mathematics course, especially in analytic geometry courses. The way to encourage, pre-service mathematics teachers’ engagement in analytical geometry lectures is to use a geogebra applet-based didactic design. This study aims to describe, pre-service mathematics teachers’ engagement in online lectures using geogebra, namely in analytical geometry and multivariable calculus courses. This research was conducted on 72 pre-service mathematics teachers who enrolled in analytic geometry or multivariate courses. Data were collected using a Math Engagement Scales questionnaire consisting of cognitive, behavioral, social and emotional dimensions. This questionnaire uses a Likert scale. The data were analyzed quantitatively descriptively. The results show that pre-service mathematics teachers' engagement is in the high category. In detail, pre-service mathematics teachers’ engagement in the high category in terms of cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and social engagement. These results show the use of geogebra applet-based didactic design can encourage pre-service mathematics teachers' engagement in online lectures.

1.
M. T.
Wang
and
J.
Degol
,
Child Dev Perspect
8
,
137
143
(
2014
).
2.
F.
Fung
,
C. Y.
Tan
, and
G.
Chen
,
Psychol Sch.
55
,
815
831
(
2018
).
3.
M. T.
Wang
,
J. A.
Fredricks
,
Y.
Ye
,
T. L.
Hofkens
, and
J. S.
Linn
,
Learn. Instr.
43
,
16
26
(
2016
).
4.
I. N.
Hidayah
,
C.
Sa'dijah
C
,
Subanji
, and Sudirman, "
The students’ cognitive engagement in online mathematics learning in the pandemic Covid-19 era," in
The 4th International Conference On Mathematics and Science Education (Icomse) 2020, AIP Conf Proc
. edit by
H.
Suwono
,
H.
Habiddin
, and
D.
Rodie
(
American Institute of Physics
,
Malang
,
2021
), pp.
1
7
.
5.
A.
Bakker
and
D.
Wagner
,
Educ Stud Math.
104
,
1
4
(
2020
).
6.
A.
Bakker
,
J.
Cai
, and
L.
Zenger
,
Educ Stud Math.
107
,
1
24
(
2021
).
7.
J. A.
Fredricks
and
W.
McColskey
, "The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments," in Handbook of Research on Student Engagement edited by
S. L.
Christenson
,
C.
Wylie
, and
A. L.
Reschly
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2012
), pp.
1
840
.
8.
S.W.
Siyepu
and
S. W.
Vimbelo
,
South African J Educ.
41
,
1
13
(
2021
).
9.
W. N.
Mentari
and
H.
Syarifuddin
,
J Phys Conf Ser
.
1554
,
1
7
(
2020
).
10.
K.
Mulqueeny
,
V.
Kostyuk
,
R. S.
Baker
, and
J.
Ocumpaugh
,
Int J STEM Educ.
2
,
1
14
(
2015
).
11.
T.
Chao
,
J.
Chen
,
J. R.
Star
, and
C.
Dede
,
Digit Exp Math Educ.
2
,
253
277
(
2016
).
12.
Khairunnisa
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
948
,
1
5
(
2018
).
13.
E.
Naftaliev
and
N.
Yerushalmy
, "Engagement with Interactive Diagrams: The Role Played by Resources and Constraints," in Digital Technologies in Designing Mathematics Education Tasks edited by
A.
Leung
and
A.
Baccaglini-Frank
(
Springer
,
Cham, Switzerland
,
2017
), pp.
153
173
.
14.
Nisiyatussani
,
V.
Ayuningtyas
,
M.
Fathurrohman
, and
N.
Anriani
,
J Math Educ.
9
,
27
40
(
2018
).
15.
A.
Leung
and
A. M. S.
Lee
,
Educ Stud Math.
82
,
361
377
(
2013
).
16.
A.
Leung
, "Exploring Techno-Pedagogic Task Design in the Mathematics Classroom Boundary object," in
Digital Technologies in Designing Mathematics Education Tasks,
edited by
A.
Leung
and
A.
Baccaglini-Frank
(
Springer, Cham
,
2017
), pp.
3
16
.
17.
S. M.
Günster
and
H. G.
Weigand
,
ZDM
52
,
1259
1274
(
2020
).
18.
M.
Cevikbas
and
G.
Kaiser
,
Mathematics
9
,
1
20
(
2021
).
19.
G.
Brousseau
, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics (
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht
,
2002
).
20.
Sugiyono
, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (
Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2012
).
21.
A.
Watson
and
M.
Ohtani M
, editors. Task Design In Mathematics Education (
Springer, Cham
,
2015
).
22.
A.
Leung
and
A.
Baccaglini-Frank
, editors. Digital Technologies in Designing Mathematics Education Tasks (
Springer, Cham
,
2017
).
23.
A.
Watson
, et al. "
Introduction
," in
Proceedings of ICMI Study 22
edited by
C.
Margolinas
(
ICMI
,
Oxford
,
2013
), pp.
9
15
.
24.
P.
Sullivan
,
D. M.
Clarke
, and
B.
Clarke
, editors. Teaching with Tasks for Effective Mathematics Learning (
Springer
,
New York
,
2013
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.