This study describes the formulation of competency achievement indicators in Potential SHS, whether the same or higher than Basic Competence (BC) in Curriculum 2013, the learning model used by teachers, and the teacher factors behind it. This research is descriptive research that describes the conformity between expectations and reality in Potential SHS. The research subjects used convenience sampling for the 11th-grade biology teacher odd semester. Data collection is using interviews and questionnaires. This study compares policies and facts about implementing the 2013 curriculum on biology learning at Potential SHS. The research results show that teachers at Potential SHS have formulated indicators of competency achievement reaching the C4 level and two levels below it with a percentage of 100% and 57% for A1 dan A2. In contrast, A3 formulates indicators of competency achievement, with the highest mode reaching the C4 level of 86%. The learning model used by the potential SHS teacher is Problem Based Learning (PBL), discovery, inquiry learning, and Project-Based Learning (PjBL). The teacher factors behind academic qualifications have fulfilled the qualification standards according to the Regulation of the Minister of National Education Number 16 of 2007 because they are a bachelor and a postgraduate.

1.
Zainuddin
H.
,
Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Membentuk Karakter Anak Bangsa
.
Universum
, vol.
9
, iss.
1
, pp.
131
9
(
2015
).
2.
Rakhmawati
S
,
Muspiroh
N
,
Azmi
N.
,
Analisis Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 ditinjau dari Standar Proses dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Krangkeng
. vol.
5
, iss.
2
, pp.
156
64
(
2016
).
3.
Ardi
,
Rahmi YL
,
Amazan
HM
.,
An Analysis of The Implementation 2013 Curriculum of The Learning Biology In Senior High School At Pesisir Selatan
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
, vol.
1317
, iss.
1
, (
2019
).
4.
Sudarisman
S.
,
Memahami Hakikat dan Karakteristik Pembelajaran Biologi dalam Upaya Menjawab Tantangan Abad 21 serta Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013
.
J Florea
, vol.
2
, iss.
1
, pp.
29
35
(
2015
).
5.
Uce
L.
Realitas Aktual Praksis Kurikulum: Analisis terhadap KBK
,
KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013. J Ilm Didakt.
, vol.
16
, iss.
2
, pp.
216
(
2016
).
6.
Anderson
LW
,
Krathwohl
DR
.,
Foundation Framework for Learning, Teaching and Assesment
. (
2010
), pp.
39
41
.
7.
Paidi
P
,
Mercuriani
IS
,
Subali
B.
,
Students’ competence in cognitive process and knowledge in biology based on curriculum used in Indonesia
.
Int J Instr.
, vol.
13
, iss.
3
, pp.
491
510
(
2020
).
8.
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
, (
2016
).
9.
Kilroy
DA
.
Problem based learning
.
Emerg Med J.
, vol.
21
, iss.
4
, pp.
411
3
(
2004
).
10.
Alamsyah
M
,
Ahmad
S
,
Harris
H.
Pengaruh Kualifikasi Akademik dan Pengalaman Mengajar terhadap Profesionalisme Guru
.
J Educ Res.
, vol.
1
, iss.
3
, pp.
1830187
(
2020
).
11.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional
.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru
. (
2007
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.