Many parties in a construction project, such as the client, consultant, contractor and subcontractors, are responsible for delivering a quality project. A breakdown of any of the parties will critically influence the quality of the ultimate project. Subcontracting is becoming more popular in the construction industry because it allows the main contractor to transfer risk to the subcontractor and has a positive impact on specialisation in construction work. The objective of this study is to identify the critical success factors that contribute to a good subcontracting relationship by analysing Malaysian construction projects. A critical literature review was conducted to establish, ascertain and document the fifty-five factors assessing a good subcontracting relationship. The questionnaire survey was distributed via postal, face-to-face and electronic means. One thousand sets of questionnaire surveys were distributed to construction firms who registered under Grade 5, 6 and 7 based on the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia’s list of registered contractors. A total of 305 questionnaires were collected and analysed using IBM SPSS software. The data was then analysed using descriptive analysis, frequency analysis and factor analysis. The results confirmed the existence of the factors identified in the literature review, and they also indicated that the factor analysis technique of the 35 factors out of 55 were grouped into 11 underlying factors, which included based on the findings. The study found that having competency (0.650) and good communication (0.638) had a significant influence on a good subcontracting relationship. Lastly, the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) that influence the development of subcontracting relationships must be studied in order to determine the solutions or ways to improve the construction supply chain relationships. In this regard, this study can fill existing research gaps while also serving as a reference in the construction supply chain, especially in the subcontracting management context.

1.
Y. L.
Lew
,
S.
Hassim
,
R.
Muniandy
,
L. T.
Hua
, “
Structural equation modelling for subcontracting practice: Malaysia chapter
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, vol.
25
, no.
7
, pp.
835
860
,
2018
.
2.
S. H. A.
Rahman
,
I. R.
Endut
,
N.
Faisol
,
S.
Paydar
, “The Importance of Collaboration in Construction Industry from Contractors’ Perspectives”,
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
,
vol. 129
, pp.
414
42
,
2014
.
3.
Y. C.
Yong
,
N. E.
Mustaffa
, “
Analysis of factors critical to construction project success in Malaysia
”,
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
, vol.
19
, pp.
543
556
,
2012
.
4.
E.
Enshassi
,
F.
Arain
,
B.
Tayeh
, “
Major causes of problems between contractors and subcontractors in Gaza Strip
”,
Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction
, vol.
17
, no.
1
, pp.
92
112
,
2012
.
5.
Y.Y.
Florence
,
L. W. K.
Khoo
, “
Improving relationships in project teams in Malaysia
”,
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
, vol.
6
, no.
3
, pp.
284
301
,
2016
.
6.
Y. C.
Yong
,
N. E.
Mustaffa
, “
Critical success factors for Malaysian construction projects: an investigative review
”,
International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability
, vol.
4
, no.
2
, pp.
93
104
,
2017
.
7.
F. Y. Y.
Ling
,
W.W.
Khoo
, "
Improving relationships in project teams in Malaysia
",
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
, vol.
6
, no.
3
, pp.
284
301
,
2016
.
8.
N. A.
Mirawati
,
S. N.
Othman
, and
M. I.
Risyawati
, “
Supplier-Contractor Partnering Impact on Construction Performance: A Study on Malaysian Construction Industry
”,
Journal of Economics, Business and Management
, vol.
3
, no.
1
, pp.
29
33
,
2015
.
9.
S. H. A.
Rahman
,
F. N. M.
Nusa
,
R. M.
Hanafiah
,
M. Z.
Jusoh
,
I. R.
Endut
,
N.
Faisol
, “Antecedents and
Consequences of
Trust
and
Satisfaction in Main
Contractor
and
Subcontractor
Relationship
”,
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
, vol.
436
, no.
1
, pp.
012024
,
2020
10.
M. R.
Othman
, “
Forging Main and Subcontractor Relationship for Successful Projects
”. http://rakan1.jkr.gov.my/csfj/editor/files/File/Projek/LessonsLearned/MAINandSUB_2.pdf. Retrieved from 10-08-2008.
11.
N.
Faisol
, “An Investigation of Relational Contracting Norms in Construction Projects in Malaysia”,
Loughborough's Institutional Repository
,
2010
.
12.
D.
Hidiroglu
, “
Self-assessment performance measurement in construction companies: an application of the EFQM Excellence Model on processes and customer stages
”,
Procedia Computer Science
, vol.
158
, pp.
844
851
,
2019
.
13.
C. Y.
Co
,
T. K.
Nguyen
,
T. N.
Nguyen
,
Q. N.
Tran
, “
The exporting and subcontracting decisions of Viet Nam's small and medium-sized enterprises
”,
International Review of Economics and Finance
, vol.
58
, pp.
449
466
,
2018
.
14.
E. P.
Small
,
L.
Ayyash
,
K.
Al Hamoun
, “
Benchmarking Performance of TQM Principes in Electrical Subcontracting in Dubai: A Case Study
”,
Procedia Engineering
, vol.
196
, pp.
622
629
,
2017
.
15.
G. A.
Penaloza
,
T. A.
Saurin
,
C. T.
Formoso
, “
Monitoring complexity and resilience in construction projects: The contribution of safety performance measurement systems
”,
Applied Ergonomics
, vol.
82
, no.
102978
,
2020
.
16.
A. S.
Patrucco
,
A.
Moretto
,
L.
Knight
, “
Does relationship control hinder relationship commitment? The role of supplier performance measurement systems in construction infrastructure projects
”,
International Journal Production Economics
, vol.
233
, no.
9
,
2020
.
17.
M. B.
Jelodar
,
T. W.
Yiu
,
S.
Wilkinson
, “
A conceptualization of relationship quality in construction procurement
”,
International Journal of Project Management
, vol.
34
, no.
6, 997–1011
,
2016
.
18.
D. G.
Silva
,
G.
Kosmopoulou
,
C.
Lamarche
, “
Subcontracting and the survival of plants in the road construction industry: A panel quantile regression analysis
”,
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
, vol.
137
, pp.
113
131
,
2017
.
19.
O. A.
Akintan
,
R.
Morledge
, “
Improving the Collaboration between Main Contractors and Subcontractors within Traditional Construction Procurement
”,
Journal of Construction Engineering
, vol.
2013
, no.
281236
, pp.
1
11
,
2013
.
20.
M.
Bresnen
and
N.
Marshall
, “
Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances
”,
Construction Management and Economics
, vol.
18
, pp.
587
598
,
2000
.
21.
R. A.
Haris
, Inayatusshobah,
A.
Pujiastutik
, “
The Effect of Service Quality and Price on User Loyalty Contractor Services Pt. Hadi Jaya Bore Land Surabaya
”,
Palarch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology
, vol.
18
, no.
7
,
2021
.
22.
J.
Tarzijan
,
F.
Brahm
, “
Subcontracting in project-based firms: Do you follow the same pattern across your different projects?
”,
International Journal of Project Management
, vol.
32
, pp.
995
1006
,
2014
.
23.
M.
Shelbourn
,
N. M.
Bouchlaghem
,
C.
Anumba
,
P.
Carrillo
, “Planning and Implementation of Effective Collaboration in Construction Projects”,
Construction Innovation: Information
,
Process, Management
, vol.
7
, no.
4
, pp.
357
377
,
2007
.
24.
P.
McDermott
,
M. M. A.
Khalfan
,
W.
Swan
, “
An Exploration of the Relationship between Trust and Collaborative Working in the Construction Sector
”,
Construction Information Quarterly
, vol.
6
, no.
4
, pp.
140
146
,
2004
.
25.
P.
Manu
,
N.
Ankrah
,
D.
Proverbs
,
S.
Suresh
, “
Mitigation the health and safety influence of subcontracting in construction: The approach of main contractors
”,
International Journal of Project Management
, vol.
31
, pp.
1017
1026
,
2013
.
26.
S.
Barclay
,
C.
Todd
,
I.
Finlay
,
G.
Grande
,
P.
Wyatt
, “
Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs
”,
Family Practices, Oxford University Press
, vol.
19
, no.
1
, pp.
105
111
,
2002
.
27.
M.
Denscombe
, “The good research guide for small-scale social research projects”, (3rd ed.),
New York: McGraw-Hill
,
2007
.
28.
J.
Pallant
, “SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis for Windows”, 3rd Ed.,
Open University Press
,
Maidenhead
,
2007
.
29.
A. P.
Field
, “Discovering statistics using SPSS”, (2nd edition),
London: Sage
,
2005
.
30.
R.
Krejcie
,
D.
Morgan
, “
Determining sample size for research activities
”,
Educational and Psychological Measurement
, vol.
30
, no.
3
, pp.
607
610
,
1970
.
31.
U.
Sekaran
,
R.
Bougie
Research methods for business, United Nations e-government survey 2010
”,
2010
32.
J. T.
Roscoe
, “Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Science”,
International Series in Decision Process
, 2nd Edition, Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York
,
1975
33.
H. F.
Kaiser
, “
An index of factorial simplicity
”,
Psychometrika
, vol.
39
, pp.
31
36
,
1974
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.