Memory or retention is one of the important factors in determining the success of student learning. Memory plays a role in producing good quality learning. This study aims to determine the description of the defense of students' science retention in the Vibration and Wave material taught in class VIII semester 2. This study uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive method. The research data were obtained from learning outcomes questions which were given repeatedly 3 times in the same time interval. The data from this research were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis using exponential graphs which would later produce exponential equations. The population in this study were 8 classes in Class VIII. The research sample in this study were 3 classes in class VIII, namely VIII A, VIII B, and VIII C. The results obtained from this study were that a steep graph was obtained with the exponential equation y=60.134e−0.062x. Student retention drops sharply from the first week to the third week. Students have not been able to maintain their retention of Vibration and Wave material through the application of learning models commonly used in these science subjects. The exponential power value which has a negative value explains that every week there has been a continuous decline in students' memory of the science knowledge they have acquired. This decrease is due to the fact that the learning process used has not included many of the five senses in its acquisition and there is no simultaneous repetition of the knowledge that has been obtained by students.

1.
V. L. P.
Sutrisno
and
B. T.
Siswanto
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi
6
,
111
120
(
2016
).
2.
S.
Nurhasanah
and
A.
Sobandi
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran
1
,
128
135
(
2016
).
3.
M. S.
Arifin
,
Z.
Siti
, and
M.
Susriyati
,
Hubungan antara keterampilan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar biologi dan retensi siswa kelas X dengan strategi reciprocal teaching di SMA Negeri 1 Lawang
, (
Skripsi tidak diterbitkan
,
Universitas Negeri Malang
,
2013
).
4.
N. N.
Hasanah
,
S
Supeno
, and
S.
Wahyuni
,
Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pendidikan Sains
2
,
25
32
(
2017
).
5.
N.
Indana
,
Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam
3
,
121
147
(
2018
).
6.
R. W.
Dahar
,
Teori-teori belajar
(
Erlangga
,
Jakarta
,
1989
).
7.
B.
De Porter
and
M.
Hernacki
,
Quantum Teaching (Terjemahan)
(
Kaifa-Mizan
,
Bandung
,
2000
).
8.
R. C.
Atkinson
and
R. M.
Shiffrin
,
Scientific American
225
,
82
91
(
1971
).
9.
M.
Bhinnety
,
Buletin Psikologi
16
(
2008
).
10.
R. L.
Solso
,
Cognitive Psychology
, (4th ed) (
Allyn and Bacon, Inc
,
Boston
,
1995
).
11.
L. W.
Anderson
,
D. R.
Khartwohl
,
P. W.
Airasian
,
K. A.
Cruikshank
,
R. E.
,
Mayer
,
P. R.
Pintrich
, et al,
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assissing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
, (
Longman
,
New York
,
2001
).
12.
H. M.
Cannon
and
A. H.
Feinstein
,
“Bloom beyond Bloom: Using the revised taxonomy to develop experiential learning strategies
. In
Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference
, (
2005). p
.
32
.
13.
E.
Purwaningsih
,
Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics
5
,
9
15
(
2015
).
14.
W. F.
Sari
,
H. A.
Melati
, and
R. P.
Sartika
,
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa
7
(
2018
).
15.
V. Y.
Hikmawati
,
Jurnal Bio Education.
2
,
55
63
(
2017
).
16.
S.
Skamolson
,
Language Institute Chulalongkorn University
1
,
1
20
(
2007
).
17.
Z.
Nuraeni
,
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
5
,
9
16
(
2017
).
18.
J. W.
Santrock
,
Psikologi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua, terjemahan Tri Wibowo BS
(
Kencana Perdana Media Group
,
Jakarta
,
2008
) p.
357
.
19.
D.
Kolb
,
Towards an applied theory of experiential learning
(
Theories of Group Process
,
1975
) p.
33
56
.
20.
I. P. A.
Darmawan
, and
E.
Sujoko
,
Satya Widya
29
(,
30
39
(
2013
).
21.
Y.
Zorlu
, and
F.
Sezek
,
International Journal of Progressive Education
16
,
135
157
(
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.