The Internet is a very important aspect in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. The Internet of Things has a huge impact on many kinds of industry. There are many IoT platforms that allow us to send and receive data and it raises difficulty to choose the right platform for particular system. In this study, three IoT platforms are compared to find out how well they perform. The system model that is used in this study consists of two subsytem that send data to the IoT platforms via wifi connection. Data is generated by the DHT11 temperature sensors and processed by NodeMCU prior to transmission process. IoT Platforms will display the data received with the time when it's received. Many devices are used in the system for our study, such as NodeMCU as a microcontroller, Ubidots, Thingspeak, and Antares as IoT platforms, DHT11 sensors and pseudo-data as data input. The designed system worked well to provide adequate number of data to be sent to IoT platform. The IoT platforms are evaluated using two parameters; delay and data error rate. The results of this study show that the performance of IoT platforms depend on data transmission interval time regardless the server location.

 

Topics
Microcontroller, Information technology, Data processing, Industry
1.
S.
 
Muji
,
“Perkembangan Industry 4.0,”
 
2019
, https://osf.io/yuzha (Accessed 18 November 2020)
Google Scholar
 
2.
G.
 
Jasmin
 et. Al., “A Detailed Analysis of IoT Platform Architectures: Concepts, Similarities, and Differences”,
in Internet of Everything: Algorithms, Methodologies Technologies and Perspectives
(
Springer
,
Stuttgart
,
2018
) pp.
81
–
101
.
Google Scholar
 
3.
P. O.
 
Bagus
 et. Al., “
Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak IoT Cloud Platform Berbasis Protokol Komunikasi HTTP
,”
Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer
 
2
, No.
9
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
H. M.
 
Irsyade
 et. Al., “
Konfigurasi Arduino IDE Untuk Monitoring Pendeteksi Suhu dan Kelembapan Pada Ruang Data Center Menggunakan Sensor DHT11
,”
Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma
 
4
, No.
1
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
5.
N.
 
Bhumi
 and
C.
 
Tushar
, “
Study of Various Internet of Things Platform
,”
International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey (IJCSES)
 
6
, No.
6
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
M. M. Nurdin
 
Abdul
, “
Internet of Things (Iot) Pada Sistem Monitoring Irigasi (Smart Irigasi
),”
Jurnal Infotronik
 
3
,
No.2
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
Z.
 
Milan
, “
Survey of Internet-of-Things Platforms
,”
in Procedings of 6th International Conference on Information Society and Technology
,
Kopaonik
(
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
8.
Antares
, https://antares.id/landing (Accessed 19 December 2020)
9.
Ubidots
, https://ubidots.com/pricing/ (Accessed 21 December 2020)
10.
Thingspeak
. https://thingspeak.com/prices/thingspeak_standard (Accessed 20 December 2020)
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2023 Author(s).
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.