In bioinformatics, graphs are often used to describe cell processes, representing interactions between proteins in a protein-protein interaction network. Some proteins significantly influence these tissues and play an essential role in a regulation called significant proteins. Significant proteins are functional as data for drug discovery. Graph analysis is needed to reduce the graph and find these significant proteins. So far, there have been no studies discussing protein interactions in avian influenza type A/H9N2, a zoonotic subtype of avian influenza. Although this virus is classified as Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza, it is troubling the public because it reduces the production of chicken eggs by 80% and disrupts the reproductive organs of mammals. This study aimed to find a significant protein from avian influenza type A/H9N2. From the results of this study, we found ten network clusters with the ClusterONE algorithm. We perform graph analysis on the first cluster because it is the best cluster with the smallest p-value of 0.000023. The cluster contains 20 nodes representing 20 proteins. The analysis graph (Analysis centrality) that is simulated in MATLAB includes betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, degree centrality, eigenvector centrality, and page rank centrality. Of the 20 proteins, nine significant proteins were obtained, namely CD247, CD48, FCGR2A, FCGR2B, IL10, PTPN22, PTPRC, SLAMF1, and TRL5, the highest score on the FCGR2A protein. The highest score indicates that the FCGR2A protein has the most dominant effect on the protein-protein interaction network of Avian Influenza virus type A/H9N2.

1.
J.
Chang
,
Y.
Zhou
,
M.
Qamar
,
L.
Chen
, and
Y.
Ding
, “
Prediction of protein-protein interactions by evidence combinging methods
,”
Molecular Science
17
,
1946
(
2016
).
2.
A.
Ozgur
,
T.
Vu
,
G.
Erkan
, and
D.
Radev
, “
Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network
,”
Bioinformatics
13
,
277
(
2008
).
3.
Y.
Xia
,
H.
Yu
,
R.
Jensen
,
M.
Seringhaus
,
S.
Baxter
, and
M. G. D.
Greenbaurn
, “
Analyzing cellular biochemistry in terms of molecular networks
,”
Annual Review of Biochemistry
73
,
1051
(
2004
).
4.
W.
Liu
,
A.
Wu
,
M.
Pellegrini
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Integrative analysis of human protein, function and disease networks open
,”
Scientific Report
5
, – (
2015
).
5.
M.
Singh
and
G.
Singh
, “
Cluster analysis technique based on bipartite graph for human protein class prediction
,”
International Journal of Computer Application
20
,
1
(
2011
).
6.
J.
Ran
,
H.
Li
,
L.
Liu
,
Y.
Xing
,
X.
Li
,
H.
Shen
,
Y.
Chen
,
X.
Jiang
,
Y.
Li
, and H.Li, “
Construction and analysis of the protein-protein interaction network related to essential hypertension
,”
BMC Syst Biol
32
, – (
2013
).
7.
S.
Amiroch
,
M.
Irawan
,
I.
Mukhlash
,
A.
Ansori
, and
C.
Nidhom
, “
Identification of the spread of the influenza virus type a/h9n2 in.indonesia using the neighbor-joining algorithm with felsenstein models
,”
Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences
48
,
5
(
2021
).
8.
D.
Mistry
,
R.
Wise
, and
J.
Dickerson
, “
Diffslc: a graph centrality method to detect essential proteins of a protein-protein interaction network
,”
PLoS ONE
12
, – (
2017
).
9.
M.
Hahn
and
A.
Kern
, “
Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks
,”
Mol Biol Evol
4
,
803
(
2006
).
10.
J.
Amberger
,
C.
Bocchini
,
A.
Scott
, and
A.
Hamosh
, “
Omim.org: Leveraging knowledge across phenotype-gene relationships
,”
Nucleic Acids Res.
47
,
D1038
D1043
(
2019
).
11.
H.
Cook
,
N.
Doncheva
,
D.
Szklarczyk
,
C.
Merin
, and
L.
Jensen
, “
iruses.string: A virus-host protein-protein interaction database
,”
Viruses
10
,
519
(
2018
).
12.
D.
Szklarczyk
, “
The string database in 2021: Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets
,”
Nucleic Acid Res.
49
,
D605
D612
(
2021
).
13.
T.
Nephusz
,
H.
Yu
, and
A.
Paccanaro
, “
Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks
,”
Nat Method
9
,
471
472
(
2013
).
14.
T.
Valente
,
K.
Coronges
,
C.
Lakon
, and
E.
Costenbader
, “
How correlated are network centrality measures?
Connect. (Tor)
28
,
16
26
(
2021
).
15.
A.
Mihaescu
, “
Graph theory analysis of the dopamine d2 receptor network in parkinson’s disease patients with cognitive decline
,”
J. Neurosci. Res
99
,
947
965
(
2021
).
16.
M.
Barthelamy
, “
Betweenness centrality in large complex networks
,”
European Physical Journal B
38
,
163
168
(
2004
).
17.
Y.
Du
,
C.
Gao
,
X.
Chen
,
Y.
Hu
,
R.
Sadiq
, and
Y.
Deng
, “
A new closeness centrality measure via effective distance in complex networks
,”
Chaos An Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci.
25
,
033112
(
2015
).
18.
X.
Tang
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Zhong
, and
Y.
Pan
, “
Predicting essential proteins basedon weighted degree centrality
,”
IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinforma.
11
,
407
418
(
2014
).
19.
L.
Sola
,
M.
Romance
,
R.
Criado
,
J.
Flores
,
A. G.
del Amo
, and
S.
Boccaletti
, “
Eigenvector centrality of nodes in multiplex networks
,”
Chaos
23
,
033131
(
2013
).
20.
G.
Ivan
and
V.
Grolmusz
, “
When the web meets the cell: Using personalized pagerank for analyzing protein interaction networks
,”
Bioinfor- matics
27
,
405
407
(
2011
).
21.
M. A.
Faroby
,
M.
Irawan
, and
N.
Puspaningsih
, “
Xgboost and network analysis for prediction of proteins affecting insulin based on protein protein interactions
,”
Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
5
,
253
262
(
2020
).
22.
G.
Lee
and
M.
Djauhari
, “
Network topology of indonesian stock market
.”
2012 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Social Networking (ICCCSN
) (
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.