Integral calculus learning online has a significant impact on students’ ability to understand the material. One of the impacts experienced by students is anxiety in dealing with integral calculus learning online. some students are not used to learning integral calculus online, so when they get assignments they tend to be nervous and confused about completing them. This study aims to determine students’ level of mathematical anxiety in online learning in integral calculus courses. The type of research used in this study is descriptive quantitative. The research was conducted at STKIP Pamane Talino. Mathematical anxiety indicators used are subjective emotional components, cognitive components, psychological reactions, behavioral responses. Based on the results of the study we can conclude that most students (26 out of 30 students) have moderate anxiety levels. Although it is quite affecting the academic ability of students, but it can be said that the level of anxiety of students is not in a worrying condition, this can be seen in the absence of students who have high levels of anxiety. By looking at 4 indicators (subjective emotional, cognitive, psychological reactions, and behavioral responses) it can be noted that some students who gave answers indicated high levels of anxiety. However, even so based on overall calculations remain predominantly answered with indications of moderate anxiety levels.

1.
M.
Finlayson
,
Improv. Sch.
17
,
99
115
(
2014
).
2.
R.
Hidayat
, and
J.
Rahmatudin
,
Phenom. J. Pendidik. MIPA.
8
,
142
153
(
2018
).
3.
M.
Baloǧlu
, and
R.
Koçak
,
Pers. Individ. Dif.
40
,
1325
1335
(
2006
).
4.
E.
Geist
,
J. Instr. Psychol.
37
,
24
31
(
2010
).
5.
M.
Sintawati
,
Semin. Nas. Pendidik.
,
4
5
(
2018
).
6.
R.
Sonia
,
A.
Alizamar
,
A.
Bentri
, and
F. W.
Putra
,
J. Apl. IPTEK Indones.
4
,
12
18
(
2020
).
7.
E.
Istikomah
, and
A.
Wahyuni
,
JRAMathEdu (Journal Res. Adv. Math. Educ.
3
,
69
(
2018
).
8.
P.
Bjälkebring
,
Front. Educ.
4
,
1
5
(
2019
).
9.
J.
Zhang
,
N.
Zhao
, and
Q. P.
Kong
,
Front. Psychol.
10
,
1
17
(
2019
).
10.
R.
Hembree
,
Natl. Counc. Teach. Math.
21
,
33
46
(
2015
).
11.
H.
Africk
,
S.
Tobias
,
S.
Kogelman
, and
J.
Warren
,
Two-Year Coll. Math. J.
12
,
59
(
1981
).
12.
M. H.
Ashcraft
, and
A. M.
Moore
,
J. Psychoeduc. Assess.
27
,
197
205
(
2009
).
13.
F.
Yüksel-Şahin
,
Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ.
3
,
179
192
(
2008
).
14.
D.
Rozgonjuk
,
T.
Kraav
,
K.
Mikkor
,
K.
Orav-Puurand
, and
K.
Täht
,
Int. J. STEM Educ.
7
(
2020
).
15.
R. E.
Yuliani
,
D.
Suryadi
, and
J. A.
Dahlan
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
1157
(
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.