The Moodle Learning Management System (LMS) at the State University of Malang is named SIPEJAR (Sistem Pengelolaan Pembelajaran). Researchers apply SIPEJAR synchronously on metal casting learning theory both in traditional learning and problem-based learning models for students of the Diploma-3 Mechanical Engineering, State University of Malang. This study explored the differences in student learning outcomes in metal casting courses between the traditional learning models and problem-based learning using the SIPEJAR in the Diploma-3 Mechanical Engineering. This research used the Quasi-Experimental Design with tests as the data collection technique. Forty students were chosen as research participants and grouped into the experimental group, consisting of 20 students using problem-based learning and 20 students for the control group using traditional learning. The data analysis technique used the T-test to obtain the learning outcomes. The differences in the two learning outcomes were obtained using the T-test, and it showed a significance difference in student learning outcomes in metal casting courses using traditional learning models with problem-based learning using SIPEJAR in the Diploma-3 Mechanical Engineering Study Program. This learning model effectively develops thinking skills, solving problems, finding concepts, applying concepts, and increasing learning outcomes.

1.
M. S.
Borba
,
M. C.
Askar
,
P.
Engelbrecht
,
J.
Gadanidis
,
G.
Llinares
,
S.
Aguilar
, “
Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education
”, (
2016
).
2.
L.
Eady
&
Lockyer
, “
Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies
.,”
Teach Prim. Sch.
3.
Z.
Lavicza
& ZDM, vol.
42
, no.
1
, pp.
105
119
(
2010
).
4.
Z.
Çevikbaş
M.
Argün
,
J. Educ. Train. Stud.
, vol.
5
, no.
11
(
2017
).
5.
C.
O'flaherty
, J. &
Phillips
,
Internet High. Educ.
, vol.
25
, pp.
85
95
(
2015
).
6.
E.
Sutadji
,
W. N.
Hidayat
,
S.
Patmanthara
,
S.
Sulton
,
N. A. M.
Jabari
, and
M.
Irsyad
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
, vol.
732
, no.
1
, (
2020
).
7.
N. Abid
Azhar
&
K.
Iqbal
,
Prize. Soc. Sciemce J.
, vol.
2
, no.
2
, (
2018
).
8.
R. I.
Arends
, “Learning to teach (9th ed.)”.
New York
:
McGraw-Hill
, (
2012
).
9.
L. P.
Hu
,
Y. H.
Xing
, &
J.
Tu
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
, (
2018
).
10.
R.
Ramadhani
,
R.
Umam
,
A.
Abdurrahman
, and
M.
Syazali
,
J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci.
, vol.
7
, no.
2
, pp.
137
158
(
2019
).
11.
G.
Ozdamli
&
F.
Asiksoy
,
World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues
, vol.
8
, no.
2
, pp.
98
105
(
2016
).
12.
L. L.
Scholarsarchive
&
B.
Young
,
Brigham Young Univ.
, (
2014
).
13.
D.
Strohmyer
,
Can, J. Action Res.
, vol.
17
, no.
2
, pp.
33
35
(
2016
).
14.
D.
Prestiadi
, et al., vol.
508
, no. Icite, pp.
535
540
, (
2020
).
15.
D.
Weltman
and
M.
Whiteside
,
J. Stat. Educ.
, vol.
18
, no.
1
, pp.
1
13
(
2010
).
16.
A.
Khalid
and
M.
Azeem
,
Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci.
, vol.
2
, no.
5
, pp.
170
177
(
2012
).
17.
J. P.
McCarthy
and
L.
Anderson
,
Innov. High. Educ.
, vol.
24
, no.
4
, pp.
279
294
(
2000
).
18.
R.
Oliver
and
A.
Omari
,
Aust. J. Educ. Technol.
, vol.
15
, no.
1
, pp.
58
79
(
1999
).
19.
R. F.
Kenny
,
M.
Bullen
,
J.
Loftus
,
M.
Bullen
, and
J.
Loftus
, “
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Problem Formulation and Resolution in Online Problem-Based Learning Problem Formulation and Resolution in Online Problem-Based Learning
,” (
2021
).
20.
S.
Şendaǧ
and
H. Ferhan
Odabaşi
,
Comput. Educ.
, vol.
53
, no.
1
, pp.
132
141
(
2009
).
21.
A.
In'am
and
S.
Hajar
,
Int. J. Instr.
, vol.
10
, no.
1
, pp.
55
70
(
2017
).
22.
E.
Ellizar
,
H.
Hardeli
,
S.
Beltris
, and
R.
Suharni
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
, vol.
335
, no.
1
, pp.
0
7
(
2018
).
23.
I.
Kusmaryono
and
H.
Suyitno
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
, vol.
693
, no.
1
, pp.
0
10
(
2016
).
24.
K. N.
Drake
and
D.
Long
,
J. Elem. Sci. Educ.
, vol.
21
, no.
1
, pp.
1
16
(Jan.
2009
).
25.
O.
Akınoğlu
and
R. Ö.
Tandoğan
,
“The Effects of Problem-Based Active Learning in Science Education on Students
Academic Achievement, Attitude and Concept Learning
,” p.
12
, (
2007
).
26.
C. E.
Hmelo-Silver
,
Educ. Psychol. Rev.
, vol.
16
, no.
3
, pp.
235
266
(
2004
).
27.
M. B.
Yidana
, vol.
4
, no.
1
, p.
23
(
2018
).
28.
E. H.
Yew
and
K.
Goh
,
Heal. Prof. Educ.
, vol.
2
, no.
2
, pp.
75
79
(Dec.
2016
).
29.
Abanikannda
,
Int. J. Educ. Learn. Dev.
, vol.
4
, no.
3
, pp.
55
63
(
2016
).
30.
H.
Barrows
,
The Tutorial Process
.
Springfield, IL
:
Southern Illionis University School of Medice
, (
1992
).
31.
N. L.
Sagala
and
M. P.
Simanjuntak
,
IOSR J. Res. Method Educ.
, vol.
7
, no.
4
, pp.
1
9
(
2017
).
32.
W.
Silviarza
,
S.
Sumarmi
, and
B.
Handoyo
,
J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci.
, vol.
8
, no.
5
, pp.
1045
1060
(
2019
).
33.
T.
Chamidy
,
I. N. S.
Degeng
, and
S.
Ulfa
,
J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci.
, vol.
8
, no.
2
, pp.
691
700
(
2020
).
34.
F.
Kazemi
and
M.
Ghoraishi
,
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
, vol.
46
, pp.
3852
3856
(
2012
).
35.
O.
Akinoǧlu
and
R. Ö.
Tandoǧan
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
, vol.
3
, no.
1
, pp.
71
81
(
2007
).
36.
N. L.
Oldenburg
and
W. C.
Hung
,
J. Nurs. Educ.
, vol.
49
, no.
4
, pp.
219
222
(
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.