This research aim to know support in implementation of teaching factory and industry collaboration towards learning outcomes and work preparedness of vocational high school student in east java province.

Research designed are mixing method. Populations of this research are vocational high school in east java that implement teaching factory. This research use random sampling, the samples are from 8 vocational high schools (public and private school) in 6 cities with 65 productive teachers as respondents. Data analysis use descriptive statistic and SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) PLS to evaluation validity and to know relations every research variables.

Analysis descriptive result showed teaching factory relatively got high average value in indicator of facilities, infrastructure, and management, while for indicator of soft skill and learning implementation got low average value. Collaboration among school and industry still low if compare with description value of teaching factory, learning outcome, and student work preparedness with 2,96. SEM PLS analysis result found collaboration with industry has path coefficient 0.445 with contribution to teaching factory 0,198. Path coefficient to learning outcomes from industry collaboration, teaching factory, and together contribution are 0.704, 0.274, 0.742 respectably. Path coefficient for work preparedness from learning outcomes is 0.685 and the contribution value is 0.469. Based on the result, the key role to create high work preparedness student came from the capability of school to collaboration with industry. Because learning outcome will optimum if the school success create good collaboration with industries. The school capability to make industry collaboration plan will influence to teaching factory design that implement by the school.

1.
Y. S.
Mulyati
,
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
. Disertation not publish, (
2012
).
2.
Finch
&
Crunkilton
,
Annual Meeting of American Educational research Association (California)
, (
1979
).
3.
Direktorat PSMK
.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
(
2006
).
4.
A.
Wiyarsi
, et al,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains UNY No 1
(
2015
).
5.
Isnandar, Disertation not publish. Malang: Pascasarjana UM, (
2014
).
6.
C. A.
Prosser
&
T.
Quigley
,
American Technical Society
(
1950
).
7.
N.
Fajaryati
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, Tahun
2
(
3
):
325
337
(
2012
).
8.
Zainuddin, dkk. UNS (
2011
).
9.
Moerwishmadhi, Seminar Nasional Technopreneurship Preneurship Learning for Teaching Factory di Universitas Negeri Malang (
2009
).
10.
Isnandar, Seminar Gelar Cipta Boga Universitas Negeri Malang, (
2008
).
11.
D.
Walter
&
B.
Bevens
,
Summit
,
Nj
:
Walter Dietz
(
2006
).
12.
J.
Huntzinger
www.TWI.Institute. Org (
2009
).
13.
E.
Ralph
,
K.
Walker
&
R.
Wimmer
,
International Journal of Engineering Education.
Vol.
25
, No.
1
Januari
2009
, pp.
122
130
(
2009
).
14.
D.
Hidayat
,
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
, Jilid 17, Nomor 4, Februari 2011, hlm.
270
278
(
2011
).
15.
S. B.
Nasi
,
Global Journal of Management and Business Research
,
12
(
23
):
11
14
(
2012
).
16.
J. F.
Hair
,
W. C.
Black
,
B. J.
Babin
dan
R. E.
Anderson
,
Pearson Education, Inc
(
2010
).
17.
I.
Ghozali
and Fuad.,
Universitas Diponegoro
(
2011
).
18.
J.
Hartono
and
W.
Abdillah
,
BPFE-Yogyakarta
(
2009
).
19.
Trilling
,
Bernie and Fadel, Charles
.,
John Wiley & Sons
, 978-0-47-055362-6 (
2009
).
20.
I. W.
Ratnata
,
Enhancing the Image and Attractiveness of TVET
. In:
TVET@Asia
, issue
1
,
1
13
(retrieved 30.5.2013).
21.
Dimyati
, &
Mudjiono
,
Belajar dan Pembelajaran, PT. Rineka Cipta
(
2009
).
22.
Dirwanto
, Thesis
Univesritas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
(
2008
).
23.
A. N.
Sari
,
Jember: Universitas Negeri Jember
(
2013
).
24.
J.
Lee
,
International Journal of Vocational Education and Training
,
17
(
2
):
39
56
(
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.