The movement control policy imposed by the government worldwide has changed the community mobility during the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, the limitation of flights and the visiting policy has nearly stopped visitors to tourist destinations. This study contends that the community mobility change in a region during a pandemic relates to the region's tourism-related performance before the pandemic. Data mining approach with CRISP-DM as a framework and Knime Analytics Platform as a tool are used to analyze data on 34 Indonesian provinces. The study aims (1) to present the nature of community mobility fluctuation at the tourism-related area, (2) to group provinces based on the similarity in mobility fluctuation and tourism-related performance, and (3) to characterize provinces across the tourism-related performance. Data are collected from Google's community mobility covering mobility change in retail-and-recreation areas, parks, and transit-and-station as a time series for all provinces. In addition, tourism-related indicators are collected from the Indonesian statistics agency covering length-of-stay and occupancy rates for starred and non-starred hotels. Among three tourism-related areas, transit-and-station experience the highest mobility fluctuation in a decreasing direction. The main finding shows that six provinces with higher visitor length-of-stay and hotel occupancy rates experience greater mobility change. Bali, Yogyakarta, and Jakarta are well-known as domestic and international tourist destinations; North Sulawesi with Bunaken National Marine Park, West Papua with Raja Ampat, and Riau Islands are also popular tourist spots. The result implies that those regions may suffer a higher impact on tourism. This study contributes to the application of data mining to reveal information on publicly available socio-economic indicators.

1.
R. P.
Maradana
,
R. P.
Pradhan
,
S.
Dash
,
K.
Gaurav
,
M.
Jayakumar
, and
D.
Chatterjee
, “
Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries
,”
J. Innov. Entrep.
,
6
,
1
, pp.
0
23
,
2017
, doi: .
2.
A. M.
Pece
,
O. E. O.
Simona
, and
F.
Salisteanu
, “
Innovation and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis for CEE Countries
,”
Procedia Econ. Financ.
,
26
,
15
, pp.
461
467
,
2015
, doi: .
3.
J.
Reif
and
D.
Schmücker
, “
Exploring new ways of visitor tracking using big data sources: Opportunities and limits of passive mobile data for tourism
,”
J. Destin. Mark. Manag.
,
18
, September, p.
100481
,
2020
, doi: .
4.
J.
Susanto
,
X.
Zheng
,
Y.
Liu
, and
C.
Wang
, “
The impacts of climate variables and climate-related extreme events on island country's tourism: Evidence from Indonesia
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
276
, p.
124204
,
2020
, doi: .
5.
UNWTO
, “
Tourist numbers down 83% but confidence slowly rising
,”
World Tourism Organization
,
2021
. https://www.unwto.org/news/tourist-numbers-down-83-but-confidence-slowly-rising (accessed Mar. 06,
2021
).
6.
M.
Škare
,
D. R.
Soriano
, and
M.
Porada-Rochon
, "
Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry,
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
,
163
, April 2020,
2021
, doi: .
7.
P.
Wassler
and
D. X. F.
Fan
, “
A tale of four futures: Tourism academia and COVID-19
,”
Tour. Manag. Perspect.
,
38
, October 2020, p.
100818
,
2021
, doi: .
8.
G. D.
Sharma
,
A.
Thomas
, and
J.
Paul
, “
Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework
,”
Tour. Manag. Perspect.
,
37
, October 2020, p.
100786
,
2021
, doi: .
9.
H.
Hu
,
Y.
Yang
, and
J.
Zhang
, “
Avoiding panic during pandemics: COVID-19 and tourism-related businesses
,”
Tour. Manag.
,
86
, p.
104316
,
2021
, doi: .
10.
J. A.
Duro
,
A.
Perez-Laborda
,
J.
Turrion-Prats
, and
M.
Fernández-Fernández
, “
Covid-19 and tourism vulnerability
,”
Tour. Manag. Perspect.
,
38
, May,
2021
, doi: .
11.
A.
Postma
and
I. S.
Yeoman
, “
A systems perspective as a tool to understand disruption in travel and tourism
,”
J. Tour. Futur.
,
7
,
1
, pp.
67
77
,
2020
, doi: .
12.
UNWTO
, “
Glossary of tourism terms
,”
World Tourism Organization
,
2021
. https://www.unwto.org/glossary-tourism-terms (accessed Mar. 06,
2021
).
13.
A.
Azevedo
and
M. F.
Santos
, “
KDD, SEMMA and CRISP-DM: A Parallel Overview
,”
IADIS Eur. Conf. Data Min.
, pp.
182
185
,
2008
.
14.
U.
Shafique
and
H.
Qaiser
, “
A Comparative Study of Data Mining Process Models (KDD, CRISP-DM and SEMMA
),”
Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res.
,
12
,
1
, pp.
217
222
,
2014
, Online.. Available: http://www.ijisr.issr- journals.org/.
15.
F.
Martinez-Plumed
 et al., “
CRISP-DM Twenty Years Later: From Data Mining Processes to Data Science Trajectories
,”
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.
,
33
,
8
, pp.
3048
3061
,
2019
, doi: .
16.
C.
Oliveira
,
T.
Guimaraes
,
F.
Portela
, and
M.
Santos
, “
Benchmarking Business Analytics Techniques in Big Data
,”
Procedia Comput. Sci.
,
160
, pp.
690
695
,
2019
, doi: .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.