This study aims to determine the perceptions of high school students in the Eastern Indonesia Region, especially the provinces of Central Sulawesi and North Maluku about online mathematics learning. The sample selection was carried out in a descriptive study with this survey technique using incidental sampling consisting of 212 high school students. The findings of this study indicate that more students are not happy with online mathematics learning. The main causes are students cannot understand the teacher's explanation well, the tasks given are quite a lot, the lack of face-to-face interaction, the internet network is not optimal, and the learning methods are less fun. In addition, students who experience obstacles in participating in online mathematics learning are more than those who do not experience obstacles. The main obstacles experienced are inadequate internet network, limited data package quota, lack of motivation, difficulty focusing while studying and limited communication and interaction. In overcoming these problems, students take ways including asking teachers, friends or family about material that has not been understood, utilizing various online learning resources, making savings on the use of internet data packages and looking for locations with adequate internet networks.

1.
G. K.
Upadhyaya
,
V. K.
Jain
,
K. P.
Iyengar
,
M. K.
Patralekh
, and
A.
Vaish
,
J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma
,
11
,
S687
S695
(
2020
).
2.
M. B. N.
Wajdi
,
Iwan
Kuswandi
,
Umar
Al Faruq
,
Z.
Zulhijra
,
K.
Khairudin
, and
K.
Khoiriyah
,
J. Educ. Technol.
,
3(2
) (
2020
).
3.
Z.
Zaharah
and
G. I.
Kirilova
,
J. Sos. dan Budaya Syar-i
,
7
,
269
282
(
2020
).
4.
N.
Kapasia
 et al,
Child. Youth Serv. Rev.
,
116
,
105194
(
2020
).
5.
K.
Goldschmidt
,
J. Pediatr. Nurs.
,
53
,
88
90
, (
2020
).
6.
Y.
Bentley
,
H.
Selassie
, and
A.
Shegunshi
,
Electron. J. e-Learning
,
10
,
1
12
(
2012
).
7.
C.
Owusu-Fordjour
,
C. K.
Koomson
, and
D. & Hanson
,
Eur. J. Educ. Stud.
,
7
,
88
101
(
2020
).
8.
E. J.
Sintema
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
,
16
,
1
6
(
2020
).
9.
R.
Rasmitadila
 et al,
J. Ethn. Cult. Stud.
,
7
,
90
(
2020
).
10.
A.
Purwanto
 et al,
Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol.
,
29
,
6235
6244
(
2020
).
11.
Mailizar
,
A. Almanthari
,
S.
Maulina
, and
S.
Bruce
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
,
16
, (
2020
).
12.
H.
Baber
,
J. Educ. e-Learning Res.
,
7
,
285
292
(
2020
).
13.
R.
Kamsurya
,
Int. J. Pedagog. Dev. Lifelong Learn.
,
1
, (
2020
).
14.
M.
Fuad
,
F.
Ariyani
,
E.
Suyanto
, and
A. S.
Shidiq
,
Univers. J. Educ. Res.
,
8
,
6091
6102
(
2020
).
15.
A.
Juanda
,
A. S.
Shidiq
, and
D.
Nasrudin
,
J. Pendidik. IPA Indones.
,
10
,
48
59
(
2021
).
16.
M.
Adnan
,
“J. Pedagog. Res.
,
1
,
45
51
(
2020
).
17.
E. M.
Mulenga
and
J. M.
Marbán
,
Contemp. Educ. Technol.
,
12
, (
2020
).
18.
A. S.
Shidiq
,
A. Permanasari
,
Hernani
, and
S.
Hendayana
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1806
, (
2021
).
19.
A.
Naciri
,
M. A.
Baba
,
A.
Achbani
, and
A.
Kharbach
,
Aquademia
,
4
, (
2020
).
20.
G.
Basilaia
and
D.
Kvavadze
,
Pedagog. Res.
,
5
, (
2020
).
21.
R.
Amelia
,
G.
Kadarisma
,
N.
Fitriani
, and
Y.
Ahmadi
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1657
, (
2020
).
22.
G.
Kadarisma
,
E.
Senjayawati
, and
R.
Amelia
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1315
, (
2019
).
23.
A. I.
Sugandi
,
M.
Bernard
, and
Linda
,
AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat.
,
9
, (
2020
).
24.
L. D.
Pratama
,
W.
Lestari
, and
I.
Astutik
,
J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat.
,
9
,
413
423
(
2020
).
25.
A. K.
Arora
and
R.
Srinivasan
,
Prabandhan Indian J. Manag.
,
13
, (
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.