Numeracy literacy ability has an important role to embody a critical generation as a problem solver. The numeracy literacy consisted of two domains, namely change and relationship, and quantity. Students’ numeracy literacy is influenced by several factors, including adversity quotient. The study aims to describe students’ numeracy literacy ability viewed by the Adversity Quotient (AQ). This study was qualitative with a phenomenological design. The subjects were 12 students consisting of 5 males and 7 females 10th grade students of a senior high school in Central Java, Indonesia who had AQ types of quitter, camper, and climber. The data were collected by using 2 essay questions adapted from PISA 2012, adversity quotient scale, and interview which conducted in an unstructured interview. The result shows that in change and relationship domain, quitter students have a problem in making mathematical formulating that effect on their difficulty in employing and interpreting. Camper students are able to make the mathematical formulation rightly but they have difficulty in employing the mathematical concepts to solve their problems. Climber students are able to answer completely. In quantity domain, all of the students are able to answer the problems and they are able to justify rightness their answers.

1.
B.
Suryadi
and
T. I.
Santoso
,
Int. Educ. Stud.
10
,
12
(
2017
).
2.
A. S.
Ahmar
,
A.
Rahman
, and
U.
Mulbar
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
1028
(
2018
).
3.
P.
Aunio
and
P.
Räsänen
,
Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. J.
24
,
684
704
(
2016
).
4.
J. D.
Lange
,
Tsukuba J. Educ. Study Math.
25
,
13
35
(
2006
).
5.
P.
Stoltz
,
Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
Inc
.,
1997
), pp.
90
98
.
6.
J. M. D.
Cando
and
L. N
Villacastin
,
Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res.
18
,
354
367
(
2020
).
7.
S.
Phoolka
and
N.
Kaur
,
Int. J. Res. J. Soc. Sci. Manag.
2
,
109
117
(
2012
).
8.
D. U.
Parvathy
and
M.
Praseeda
,
IOSR J. Hum. Soc. Sci.
19
,
23
26
(
2014
).
9.
Z.
Amir
,
R.
Risnawati
,
A.
Kurniati
, and
R. C. I.
Prahmana
,
Int. J. Emerg. Math. Edu.
1
(
2017
).
10.
M. J. C.
Bautista
,
Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ.
5
,
1
6
(
2015
).
11.
OECD-PISA
,
OECD Publ.
(
2013
).
12.
S. N.
Azizah
and
Suhendra
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
1521
(
2020
).
13.
Y.
Wardani
and
A.
Mahmudi
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
1320
(
2019
).
14.
C. K.
Sari
,
S.
Sutopo
, and
D. R.
Aryuna
,
J. Res. Adv. Math. Edu.
1
,
36
48
(
2016
).
15.
T. D.
Hastuti
,
D. R.
Sari
, and
Riyadi
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
983
(
2018
).
16.
C.
Arslan
and Y.,
Am. J. Educ. Res.
3
,
1519
1523
(
2015
).
17.
N. A
Dina
,
S. M.
Amin
, and
Masriyah
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
947
(
2018
).
18.
C. S. N
Somaratne
,
L. N. A. C.
Jayawardena
, and
B. M. K.
Perera
,
Trop. Agric. Res.
29
,
45
54
(
2017
).
19.
S.
Singh
and
T.
Sharma
,
Procedia Comput. Sci.
122
,
86
93
(
2017
).
20.
A. H.
Firmansyah
,
E. T.
Djatmika
, and
A.
Hermawan
,
IOSR J. Bus. Manag.
18
,
11
(
2016
).
21.
L.
Alfieri
,
P. J.
Brooks
,
N. J.
Aldrich
, and
H. R.
Tenenbaum
,
J. Edu. Psy.
103
,
1
18
(
2011
).
22.
I.
Sari
,
P.
Sinaga
, and
Hernani
, "
The impact of industrial revolution 4.0 on basic chemistry learning
",
in Science and Mathematics International Conference 2020, AIP Conference Proceeding
2331
, edited by
M.
Meiliasari
, et al.
(
AIP Publishing
,
Melville, NY
,
2021
), pp.
040024
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.