The development of information technology in the 2lst century has brought enormous changes to the lines of life. Students must be able to deal with this change by mastering digital literacy. However, so far, measurements of digital literacy, especially students in Bali Indonesia, have not been carried out. This study aims to describe the digital literacy profile of high school students in Bali Province, Indonesia. For this reason, data were collected through an online survey. A total of 440 high school students from 9 districts in Bali Indonesia filled out the online questionnaire. Samples were drawn by a quota sampling. This study used a survey method. The results showed that there were differences in students' digital literacy based on dimensions of digital literacy and grade level. However, there were no differences in students' digital literacy based on gender. Teachers can use these digital literacy data to make lesson plans so that students can achieve learning goals appropriately.

Topics
Information technology, Students, Educational institutions, Learning and learning models, Lesson plans, Literacy, Teaching
1.
Hague
 
C
 and
Payton
 
S
 
2010
 
Digital literacy across the curriculum
[Online] Available: https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/futl06/futl06.pdf [Accessed: 20-Feb-2020]
2.
Ilomäki
 
L
,
Paavola
 
S
,
Lakkala
 
M
 and
Kantosalo
 
A
,
Educ. Inf. Technol.
 
21
 
3
 
655
–
679
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
Ferrari
 
A
 
2012
 
Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks
(
Luxembourg
:
Publications Office of the European Union
)
Google Scholar
 
4.
Janssen
 
J
,
Stoyanov
 
S
,
Ferrari
 
A
,
Punie
 
Y
,
Pannekeet
 
K
 and
Sloep
 
P
 
Comput. Educ.
 
68
 
473
–
48l
(
2013
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
Techataweewan
 
W
 and
Prasertsin
 
U
 
2018
 
Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci.
 
39
 
2
 
215
–
221
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.001
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
Ng
 
W
 
Comput. Educ.
 
59
 
1065
–
1107
(
2012
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
Park
 
Y J
 
Communic. Res.
 
40
 
2
(
2013
).
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211418338
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
Nowell
 
S D
 
EMI. Educ. Media Int.
 
51
 
2
 
109
–
123
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.924661
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
Nasah
 
A
,
DaCosta
 
B
,
Kinsell
 
C
 and
Seok
 
S
 
Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.
 
58
 
53l
–
555
(
2010
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9151-8
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
Perdana
 
R
,
Yani
 
Y
,
Jumadi
 
J
 and
Rosana
 
D
 
J. Pendidik. Indones.
 
8
 
2
 
169
–
177
(
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17168
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Kaeophanuek
 
S
,
Na-Songkhla
 
J
 and
Nilsook
 
P
 
Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol.
 
8
 
4
 
292
–
297
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
Markauskaite
 
L
 
Australas. J. Educ. Technol.
 
22
 
1
 
1
–
20
(
2006
).
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1304
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
Park
 
E Y
 and
Nam
 
S J
 
Int. J. Consum. Stud.
 
38
 
4
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12107
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
Argelagos
 
E
 and
Pifarre
 
M
 
J. Educ. Learn.
 
5
 
1
 
42
–
55
(
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
15.
Jackson
 
L A
,
Zhao
 
Y
,
Kolenic
 III 
A
,
Fitzgerald
 
H E
,
Harold
 
R
 and
Eye
 
A V
 
CyberPsychology Behav.
 
11
 
4
(
2008
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
Tella
 
A
 and
Mutula
 
S M
 
Malaysian J. Libr. Inf. Sci.
 
13
 
1
 
59
–
76
(
2008
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
Ertl
 
E
 and
Helling
 
K
 
J. Educ. Comput. Res.
 
45
 
4
 
477
–
503
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.4.f
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
Gui
 
M G
 and
Argentin
 
G
 
New Media Soc.
 
13
 
6
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
19.
Aoki
 
H
,
Kim
 
J
 and
Lee
 
W
 
Comput. Educ.
 
60
 
1
 
3l0
–
324
(
2013
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.013
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
20.
Ritzhaupt
 
A D
,
Liu
 
F
,
Dawson
 
K
 and
Barron
 
A E
 
J. Res. Technol. Educ.
 
45
 
4
 
291
–
307
(
2013
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782607
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
21.
Antonio
 
A
 and
Tuffley
 
D
 
Futur. Internet
 
6
 
4
 
673
–
687
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6040673
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
22.
Maxwell
 
C E
 and
Maxwell
 
E M
 
Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J.
 
1
 
7 96
–
108
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
23.
Dunahee
 
M
 and
Lebo
 
H
 2016
The world internet project international report
[Online] Available: http://www.digitalcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2015-World-Internet-Report.pdf [Accessed: 19-Oct-22
2020
]
24.
Pew Research Centre
 
2015
 
Men catch up with women on overall social media use. [Online] Available
: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/28/men-catch-up-with-women-on-overall-social-media-use [Accessed: 19-Oct-2020]
25.
Jan
 
S
 
Issues Trends Educ. Technol.
 
6
 
2
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v6i2_jan
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
26.
Jin
 
K Y
,
Reichert
 
F
,
Cagasan
 Jr. 
L P
,
DelaTorre
 
J
 and
Law
 
N
 
Comput. Educ.
 
157
 
103968
(
2020
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103968
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
27.
Jeffrey
 
L
,
Hegarty
 
B
,
Kelly
 
O
,
Penman
 
M
,
Coburn
 
D
 and
McDonald
 
J
 
J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.
 
10
 
1
 
383
–
4l3
(
2011
).
Google Scholar
 
28.
Knutsson
 
O
,
Blåsjö
 
M
,
Hållsten
 
S
 and
Karlström
 
P
 
Internet High. Educ.
 
15
 
4
 
237
–
246
(
2012
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.002
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
29.
Meyers
 
E M
,
Erickson
 
I
 and
Small
 
R V
 
Media Technol.
 
38
 
4
 
355
–
367
(
2013
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
30.
Kivunja
 
C
,
Int. J. High. Educ.
 
4
 
1
 
166
–
181
(
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
31.
Prior
 
D D
,
Mazanov
 
J
,
Meacheam
 
D
,
Heaslip
 
G
 and
Hanson
 
J
 
Internet High. Educ.
 
29
pp.
9l
–
97
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
32.
Tabusum
 
S Z S
,
Saleem
 
A
 and
Batcha
 
M S
,
A study Int. J. Manag. Stud. Res.
 
2
 
4
 
61
–
67
(
2014
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2022 Author(s).
2022
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.