This study aimed to explore students' mental models of acid-base theory (Arhenius, Brnnsted-Lowry, and Lewis). This research was conducted in semester of the 2020/2021 academic school year. Qualitative research with phenomenology involved 25 students of class XI as participants. The technique of collecting data with a depth interview was guided by 10 open-ended questions. Content analysis techniques with interpretive or inductive coding were used to analyze the data that ended with an Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The results showed that the students showed four classifications of mental models on acid-base theory in the sub-concept of definition of acid base, namely the True Scientific Mental Model (MMBI); Partially Correct Mental Model (MMBS); Mixed Mental Model (MMC); and Primitive Mental Model (MMP) of 72%, 24%, 0%, and 4% respectively. From the data analysis it can be concluded that factors that cause students difficulty in representing the concept are a) half or incomplete understanding; b) the tendency to memorize material; and c) misconceptions due to invalid learning resources. This study indicates the need of an active chemistry learning that trains students to think scientifically.

1.
P.
Indrayani
,
J. Pendidik. Sains
,
1
,
109
120
(
2013
).
2.
H.
Johnstone
,
J. Comput. Assist. Learn.
7
,
75
83
(
1991
).
3.
M.
Stojanovska
,
V. M.
Petrusevski
and
B.
Soptrajanov
,
Contributions Section of Natural Mathematical and Biotechnical Sciences
,
35
,
37
46
(
2014
).
4.
Y.
Handayanti
,
A. G.
Budi
and
Nahadi
,
J. Pendidik. IPA
,
1
,
107
122
(
2015
).
5.
N.
Jansoon
,
R. K.
Coll
and
Samsook
,
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ.
4
,
147
168
(
2009
).
6.
A.
Bongers
,
G.
Northoff
and
A. B.
Flyn
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
20
,
554
569
(
2019
).
7.
R. S.
Anam
,
A.
Widodo
and
W.
Sopandi
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
895
, (
2017
).
8.
F. R.
Amalia
,
S.
Ibnu
,
H. R.
Widarti
and
H.
Wuni
,
J. Pendidik. IPA
,
7
,
187
192
(
2018
).
9.
J. W.
Lin
and
M. H.
Chiu
,
Int. J. Sci. Educ
,
32
,
1617
1646
(
2010
).
10.
N.
Khasanah
,
L.
Wartono
and
Yuliati
,
J. Pendidik. IPA
,
5
,
186
191
(
2016
).
11.
H.
Tumay
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
15
,
366
379
(
2014
).
12.
M. H.
Chiu
and
S. L.
Chung
,
Innov. Educ. Teach. Int.
143
168
(
2013
).
13.
Alvarado
,
F.
Canada
,
A.
Garritz
and
V.
Mellado
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
16
,
603
618
(
2015
).
14.
M.
Drechsler
, and
J.
Van Driel
,
Chemistry Research in Science Education
,
38
,
611
631
(
2008
).
15.
A.
Wiyarsi
,
A. K.
Prodjosantoso
and
A. R. E.
Nugraheni
,
Front. Educ.
6
,
1
12
(
2021
).
16.
T. R.
Gilbert
,
R. V.
Kirss
,
N.
Foster
,
S.L
Bretz
and
G.
Davies
,
Chemistry: The Science in Context
, in e- book. edited by
E.
Fahlgreen
(
Norton & Company
.
London
,
2009
), pp.
235
255
.
17.
Y.
Handayanti
,
A. G.
Budi
and
Nahadi
,
J. Pendidik. IPA
,
1
,
107
122
(
2015
).
18.
Sunyono
and
D.
Yulianti
,
TOJNED
,
5
,
41
50
(
2015
).
19.
J. W.
Lin
,
M. H.
Chiu
and
J. C.
Liang
,
NARST
,
1
12
(
2004
).
20.
Ekiz
,
O.
Bektas
,
M.
Tuysuz
,
E.
Uzuntiryaki
,
E. S.
Kutucu
and
A.
Tarkin
,
Procedia Soc Behav Sci.
15
,
447
451
(
2011
).
21.
J. W.
Lin
and
M. H.
Chiu
,
Int. J. Sci. Educ
,
32
,
1617
1646
(
2010
).
22.
J. W.
Creswell
,
Educational Research
. edited by
M.
Bucholtz
(
Pearson Education
,
Boston
,
2012
), pp.
236
261
.
23.
L.
McClary
and
V.
Talanquer
,
J Res Sci Teach
,
46
,
390
415
(
2011
).
24.
A. C.
Wardah
and
A.
Wiyarsi
,
Univers. J. Educ. Res.
8
,
332
345
(
2020
).
25.
T. L.
Nahum
,
A.
Hofsein
,
Z.
Mamlok-Naaman
and
Bar-Dov
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
5
,
301
325
(
2004
).
26.
R. K.
Coll
and
D. F.
Treagust
,
J Res Sci Teach
,
40
,
464
486
(
2003
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.