Chemistry is abstract, to understand the concept of chemistry requires visualization and explanation through levels. This study aims to analyze macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic misconceptions in chemistry learning. The research method uses a 4D (R&D) model, namely the Dissemination stage. This test consists of 20 reasoned multiple choice questions by choosing the level of confidence. The product being tested is used for student tests in three different schools (SMAN, MAN and SMKN). The test results data were analyzed, interpreted and expressed in the profile of misconceptions at the macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic levels. The research subjects were students of class X from three different schools. The results of this study indicate that the average level of misconceptions at the macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic levels of high school students is 13%; 40%; and 43%, MAN students 30%; 37%; and 50%; SMKN students 3%; 37%; and 53%. The conclusion of this study is that the greatest misconceptions at the symbolic level occurred in three different schools, and each pattern experienced a decrease in submicroscopic and macroscopic misconceptions. The misconception test instrument developed makes it easier for teachers to analyze students' misconceptions so that misconceptions can be corrected immediately.

1.
I.
Gunawan
,
Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res.
128
,
56
63
(
2017
).
2.
Khurotulaeni
,
J. Res. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach.
2
,
17
23
(
2019
).
3.
A. S.
Argaw
,
B. B.
Haile
,
B. T.
Ayalew
, and
S. G.
Kuma
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
13
,
857
871
(
2017
).
4.
W.
Setyaningrum
,
A. L.
Riani
, and
D. K.
Wardani
,
Int. J. Multicult. Multirelig. Underst.
7
,
305
313
(
2020
).
5.
S. J.
Park
, and
S.
Choi
,
Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett.
103
,
192
(
2015
).
6.
A. P.
Silalahi
,
Proc. Int. Conf. on Educ. Soc. Sci. Technol
. p.
628
633
(
2018
).
7.
H.
Tumay
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
17
,
229
245
(
2016
).
8.
M.
Proksa
,
A.
Drozdikova
, and
Z.
Halakova
,
Chem. Didact. Ecol. Metrol.
23
,
97
111
(
2018
).
9.
D. D.
Trivic
, and
V. D.
Milanovic
,
J. Serb. Chem. Soc.
83
,
1177
1192
(
2018
).
10.
A. L.
Chandrasegarana
,
F.
David
,
Treagusta
, and
M.
Mocerinob
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
8
,
293
307
(
2007
).
11.
N. E.
Diyanahesa
,
S.
Kusairi
, and
E. J.
Latifah
,
Phys.: Theor. Appl.
1
,
145
156
(
2017
).
12.
D. R.
Mulford
, and
W. R.
Robinson
,
J. Chem. Educ.
79
,
739
744
(
2002
).
13.
Soeharto
,
B.
Csapo
,
E.
Sarimanah
,
F. I.
Dewi
, and
T. J.
Sabri
,
Pendidik. IPA Indones.
8
,
247
266
(
2019
).
14.
A. A.
Bichi
,
R.
Talib
,
N. A.
Atan
,
H.
Ibrahim
, and
S. M.
Yusof
,
Int. J. Advances Appl. Sci.
6
,
22
29
(
2019
).
15.
S. W.
Chan
,
C. K.
Looi
, and
B.
Sumintono
,
J. Comput. Educ. JCE020(00177)
2
(
2020
).
16.
W. J.
Boone
,
J. R.
Staver
, and
M. S.
Yale
,
Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences
(
Springer
,
Dordrecht
,
2014
).
17.
B.
Sumintono
, and
W.
Widhiarso
,
Aplikasi Permodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan
(
Trim Komunikata
,
Cimahi
,
2015
).
18.
Rusmansyah
, and
Almubarak
,
J. Kim. Pendidik. Kim.
5
,
222
235
(
2020
).
19.
D. K.
Gurel
,
A.
Eryllmaz
, and
L. C.
McDermott
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
11
,
989
1008
(
2015
).
20.
Habiddin
, and
E. M.
Page
,
Indones. J. Chem.
19
,
720
736
(
2019
).
21.
H. E.
Haryono
, and
K. N.
Aini
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
1806
,
012002
(
2021
).
22.
T.
Hadinugrahaningsih
,
R. E.
Andina
,
L. R.
Munggaran
, and
Y.
Rahmawati
,
Univers. J. Educ. Res.
8
,
1926
1934
(
2020
).
23.
A.
John
,
S.
Trupia
,
B.
Kurnett
,
J.
Bronson
,
M.
Paskowitz
,
T.
Lee
,
B.
Kwan
,
N.
O'Shaughnessy
,
J.
Little
,
C.
Sutliff
, and
R.
Reardon
,
Chemistry through Inquiry
(
Pasco Scientific
,
United States of America
,
2014
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.