The aim of this study is report creativity of preservice physiscs teachers in design physics laboratory based on Arduino for learning STEM. Before design the project, they were involved in an introductory theoretical part, in which they were taught the basics of Arduino and its programming language, a hands-on section in four mini-projects and theoritical about sensors and data aquisition. The study used qualitative research with the narrative design. Data collection technique used is observation. Participants is 14 pre service physics teacher that consist of 5 males and 10 females in an LPTK that is located in Bandung, Indonesia. This course is part of the Sensor and Transducer subject. Implementation of the learning activity in online modes because of pandemic covid-19. Each of fifteen PPT were given an assignment to think about and design a laboratory activity in physiscs education for support learning physics where sensor and Aduino were used. The instrument that used to collect data is Creativity Product Analysis Matrix (CPAM). There are three creativity dimensions that used in this study which are resolution, elaboration and novelty dimension. With guidance instructor and amount of online resource related to Arduino, average of their design creativity of the physics laboratory in good category.

1.
E. C.
Prima
,
T. D.
Oktaviani
, and
H.
Sholihin
, “
STEM Learning on Electricity Using Arduino-PhET Based Experiment to Improve 8th Grade Students’ STEM Literacy
,” in
Proceeding of the 4th International Seminar of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education, IOP Publishing
, edited by
S.
Aisyah
, et al.
(
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
,
Bandung, Indonesia
,
2018
), pp.
1
5
.
2.
R. W.
Bybee
,
The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities
(
NSTA Press
,
Virginia
,
2013
), pp.
5
10
.
3.
C. C.
Johnson
,
Sch. Sci. Math
106
,
150
161
(
2006
).
4.
C. C.
Johnson
,
J. Sci. Teach
18
,
629
661
(
2007
).
5.
J. A.
Supovitz
and
H. M.
Turner
,
J. Sci. Teach
37
,
963
980
(
2000
).
6.
B. M.
Hoffer
, “Satisfying STEM Education using the Arduino Microprocessor in C Programming,”
Dissertations
,
East Tennessee State University
,
2012
.
7.
A. I.
Yasin
,
E. C.
Prima
, and
H.
Sholihin
,
J. Sci. Learn
1
,
77
94
(
2018
).
8.
P.
Mellodge
and
I.
Russell
, “
Using the Arduino Platform to Enhance Student Learning Experiences
,” in
Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology on Computer Science Education
, edited by
A.
Abunawass
, et al.
(
Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
,
2013
), pp.
338
339
.
9.
H. S.
You
,
S. M.
Chacko
, and
V.
Kapila
,
J Sci Educ Technol.
30
,
567
581
(
2021
).
10.
D.
Rihtaršič
,
World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education
16
,
380
385
(
2018
).
11.
A.
Eguchi
,
Robotics & Autonomous Systems
75
,
692
699
(
2016
).
12.
A.
Bozkurt
,
S.
Tan
,
Int J Technol Des Educ
31
,
503
529
(
2021
).
13.
T.
Mayasari
,
A.
Kadarohman
,
D.
Rusdiana
, and
I.
Kaniawati
, “
Exploration of student's creativity by integrating STEM knowledge into creative products
,” in
Proceeding of international seminar on mathematics, science, and computer science education (MSCEIS 2015)
, edited by
T.
Hidayat
, et al.
. (
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
,
Bandung, Indonesia
,
2015
) pp.
1
5
.
14.
M.
Aydeniz
and
K.
Bilican
,
J Res Sci Teach
4
,
213
234
(
2018
).
15.
N. M.
Siew
,
N.
Amir
, and
C. L.
Chong
,
SpringerPlus
4
,
1
20
(
2015
).
16.
S. J.
Hathcock
,
Res Sci Educ
4
,
727
748
(
2015
).
17.
S.
Hanif
,
A. F.
Wijaya
,
N.
Winarno
,
J. Sci. Learn.
2
,
50
57
(
2019
).
18.
J. W.
Creswell
,
Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
(
Pearson Education
,
Boston
,
2012
), pp.
21
22
.
19.
T.
Bratitsis
and
M.
Kandroudi
,
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Serious Games
1
,
1
5
(
2014
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.