Five methods for diagnosing of animal dermatophytosis were comparatively examined. A total of 54 hair samples from pets suspected for dermatophytosis were studied. The diagnostic efficiency of Wood’s lamp testing was 62.5%, while the share of false positive results was 16.7%. The direct microscopy revealed 56.3% positive samples and 7.4% false positive samples. The luminescent microscopy with calcofluor white and inoculation on DTM-Expert medium showed the best diagnostic efficiency i.e., 93.8% and 100%, respectively, with the share of false positive results 9.3% and 5.6%. Inoculation on Sabouraud’s medium revealed 81.3% samples positive for dermatophytosis. In point-of-care settings, DTM-type media is recommended as simple and accurate tool for diagnosing dermatophytosis and asymptomatic dermatophyte carrying.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
22 June 2022
PROCEEDINGS OF THE II INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MATERIALS, SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES: (CAMSTech-II 2021)
29–31 July 2021
Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Research Article|
June 22 2022
Comparison of the main methods for laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis
V. A. Savinov;
V. A. Savinov
a)
Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”
(FSC VIEV). 24-1, Ryazanskiy pr., Moscow, 109428, Russia
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
R. S. Ovchinnikov;
R. S. Ovchinnikov
b)
Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”
(FSC VIEV). 24-1, Ryazanskiy pr., Moscow, 109428, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
A. I. Laishevtsev;
A. I. Laishevtsev
c)
Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”
(FSC VIEV). 24-1, Ryazanskiy pr., Moscow, 109428, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
E. A. Melnikova;
E. A. Melnikova
d)
Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”
(FSC VIEV). 24-1, Ryazanskiy pr., Moscow, 109428, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
A. V. Kapustin
A. V. Kapustin
e)
Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV”
(FSC VIEV). 24-1, Ryazanskiy pr., Moscow, 109428, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
AIP Conf. Proc. 2467, 070018 (2022)
Citation
V. A. Savinov, R. S. Ovchinnikov, A. I. Laishevtsev, E. A. Melnikova, A. V. Kapustin; Comparison of the main methods for laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis. AIP Conf. Proc. 22 June 2022; 2467 (1): 070018. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092517
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
29
Views
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Students’ mathematical conceptual understanding: What happens to proficient students?
Dian Putri Novita Ningrum, Budi Usodo, et al.
Related Content
Specific features of sterilization technologies of the in vitro culture of the plant Circaea lutetiana L.
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2022)
Vermicomposted substrates microbiological assessment
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2022)
Immunobiological resistance and humoral protection factors in animals
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2022)