The cyber-physical systems control under real technological environment states is done under action states of different appearance nature. Actual for a cyber-physical production are noises of the control objects functionality explained with mechanical vibrations, acoustic noises, temperature fields, energy emissions (electromagnetic) and other physical effects and processes of destabilizing equipment actions. Noises characteristics and properties registration available after the cyber-physical production environment technological parameters measurement with sensor network resources in the control system let synthesize technical solutions where the noise action over the control error could be minimized. The main noises must be compensated for the control error action under the control of physical measurements. The noises by the letter that cannot be eliminated or measured provoke not fully compensated control errors being processed with automatics in the primary feedback chain. There is a scheme given to compensate cyber-physical system control error in the given action and in the noise itself formed with a multiple equipment activity in the technological environment. The cyber-physical systems noise immunity control task is studied with an energy action concentrated in the noise specter directly applied to a wireless Internet of Things connection channel. There is a scheme given of the cyber-physical system control model with the physical and virtual loops connection channel energy noises. Noise immunity control is a technology used to prevent damage to equipment that can destabilize a digital enterprise and lead to critical environmental impacts.

1.
A.
Jadlovská
,
S.
Jadlovská
, and
D.
Vošček
,
IFAC-PapersOnLine
49
(
25
),
31
36
(
2016
).
2.
A. V.
Gurjanov
,
D. A.
Zakoldaev
,
A. V.
Shukalov
, and
I. O.
Zharinov
,
Journal of physics: conference series
1015
(
5
),
052035
(
2018
).
3.
F.
Hisch
,
A.
Giusti
, and
M.
Althoff
,
IFAC-PapersOnLine
50
(
1
),
5660
5665
(
2017
).
4.
I.
Kabashkin
,
Procedia computer science
151
,
313
320
(
2019
).
5.
M.
Mizoguchi
, and
T.
Ushio
,
IFAC-PapersOnLine
48
(
27
),
248
253
(
2015
).
6.
I.
Gräler
, and
A.
Pöhler
,
Procedia CIRP
67
,
116
121
(
2018
).
7.
A. V.
Gurjanov
,
D. A.
Zakoldaev
,
A. V.
Shukalov
, and
I. O.
Zharinov
,
IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering
327
(
2
),
022111
(
2018
).
8.
C.-Y.
Chang
,
S.
Martínez
, and
J.
Cortés
,
IFAC-PapersOnLine
51
(
23
),
118
123
(
2018
).
9.
C.
Xia
,
Z.
Pan
,
J.
Polden
,
H.
Li
,
Y.
Xu
,
S.
Chen
, and
Y.
Zhang
,
Journal of manufacturing systems
57
,
31
45
(
2020
).
10.
F.
Hu
,
Y.
Lu
,
A. V.
Vasilakos
,
Q.
Hao
,
R.
Ma
,
Y.
Patil
,
T.
Zhang
,
J.
Lu
,
X.
Li
, and
N. N.
Xiong
,
Future generation computer systems
56
,
449
475
(
2016
).
11.
S.
Saraeian
,
B.
Shirazi
, and
H.
Motameni
,
International journal of critical infrastructure protection
25
,
102
124
(
2019
).
12.
X.
Huang
, and
J.
Dong
,
Journal of the Franklin institute
357
(
15
),
10799
10809
(
2020
).
13.
V. A.
Bogatyrev
, and
A. N.
Derkach
,
Computers
9
(
2
),
42
(
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.