Additive Technologies (AT) that make possible to print three-dimensional objects (prototypes) as a digital model are established in production practice and provide a number of undeniable advantages. This trend determines the relevance of studying of the use of such technologies to improve productivity of Russian industrial organizations. Modern 3D technologies might significantly reduce the technological process and accelerate the output of finished products. At the same time, before applying any new production and management approaches, it is advisable to study the factors that affect AT diffusion. Purpose of the study: based on the study of scientific literature and the practice of AT using in Russian companies, indicate the factors affecting the rate of spread of these technologies in Russia, systematize these factors as a preparatory stage for research with the TISM methodology. It will make the possibility to carry out, as the basis of the TISM methodology, a further consideration of their relationship with each other for an even deeper understanding of the internal and external limitations of the spread of additive technologies in modern domestic industry. Consequently, the authors proposed a systematization of relevant factors, both promoting and hindering the use of 3D printing technologies in Russia; a flowchart has developed using the TISM methodology, which has a comprehensive analysis of the identified factors. This result represents scientific and practical originality and can allow interested companies introducing a clear strategy in the field of AT to increase the efficiency of their activities.

1.
ASTM International
. ISO/ASTM52900-15, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing – General Principles – Terminology,
ASTM International
(
West Conshohocken
,
2015
).
2.
O. N.
Goncharova
,
Yu. M.
Berezhnoy
,
E. N.
Bessarabov
 et al.,
Engineering Bulletin of the Don
,
4
(
2016
).
3.
J. O.
Milewski
, Additive Manufacturing of Metals in
Fundamental Technology to Rocket Nozzles, Medical Implants, and Custom Jewelry
(
Cham
:
Springer International Publishing AG
,
2017
), p.
343
.
4.
V. A.
Dresvyannikov
,
V. D.
Dorofeev
,
E. P.
Strakhov
and
V. A.
Skvortsova
,
Volga region. Social sciences
2
(
50
)
219
230
(
2019
).
5.
A.V.
Shimokhin
,
Scientific Journal of the National Research University ITMO, Series Economics and Environmental Management
4
, (
2019
).
6.
M.
Despeisse
,
M.
Baumers
,
P.
Brown
 et al. 
Technol, Forecast. Soc. Change
115
,
75
84
(
2017
).
7.
H. E.
Quinlan
,
T.
Hasan
, et.al.,
Journal of Industrial Ecology
21
15
20
(
2017
).
8.
I. B.
Teslenko
,
O. B.
Digilina
and
N. V.
Abdullaev
,
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering
483
(
2019
).
9.
I.
Ribeiro
,
F.
Matos
,
C.
Jacinto
 et al.,
Sustainability
12
929
(
2020
).
10.
S.
Ford
and
M.
Despeisse
,
Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges
2016
1573
1587
.
11.
State of the 3-D printing market
2020
, available at: https://iqb.ru/upload/brochures/sculpteo-state-of-3d-printing-2020-iqb.pdf|
12.
The market of 3D printing technologies in Russia and the world: prospects for the introduction of additive technologies in production
, available at: http://3dtoday.ru/blogs/news3dtoday/frostsullivan-additive-manufacturing-technologies-market-trends-and-p/|
13.
M.
Attaran
and
M.
Attaran
,
Business Horizons
60
677
688
(
2018
).
14.
Official website of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation
, available at: https://minpromtorg.gov.ru/common/upload/files/docs/katalog_additivity.pdf|
15.
E. V.
Budanov
,
Liteyschik Rossii
3
(
2017
)
16.
Eight Russian enterprises successfully implementing additive technologies
, available at: http://blog.iqb-tech.ru/am-technologies-russian-experience|
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.