Seedless character is one of important traits for fresh fruit citrus. Since there are many mechanisms to obtain seedless fruit, it is important to identify which mechanism is possibly used in it. The first to be observed is usually the pollen characteristic. Abnormality in pollen could lead to seedless fruit production. In this study, we observed several potential seedless citrus accessions in the germplasm collection to obtain the information on the floral structure and pollen characteristics supporting the production of seedless fruits. The study was conducted at Plant Breeding Laboratory of Indonesian Citrus and Subtropical Fruits Research Institute, Batu, East Java in 2019. The flower and pollen were observed on their structure, morphology, viability, and germination percentage. The result showed that at anthesis, the anther position could be located below, above and parallel with the stigma. Flowers with anthers located below the stigma have lower chance to be self-pollinated and in the absence of pollinators it increases the opportunity to produce seedless fruit. Pollen morphology observations indicated that most accessions had elliptical shape with either acute, circular or rectangular apices. Pollen viability ranged from 64–95% with pummelo accession Bageng showed the highest percentage, and lime accession Nipis Borneo was the lowest. In addition, Nipis Borneo also has the lowest germination percentage, around 17.69%, while the highest one was observed on lemon Montaji Agrihorti which was 57.52%. This study showed that Nipis Borneo has the highest potential as seedless citrus just based on at its pollen performance, while on the other hand, Montaji Agrihorti has the highest possibility of producing seedy fruit. For more comprehensive information, further study needs to be conducted especially on the interaction of pollen and pistil.

1.
FAO
,
Citrus Fruit, Fresh and Processed Statistical Bulletin 2016
(
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
,
Rome
,
2017
),
77
p.
2.
A.
Premachandran
,
K.
Dhayasree
and
S.
Kurien
,
J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.
8
,
1053
1059
(
2019
).
3.
F.
Varoquaux
,
R.
Blanvillain
,
M.
Delseny
and
P.
Gallois
,
Trends Biotechnol.
18
,
233
242
(
2000
).
4.
R. J.
Bender
,
R. P. dos
Santos
,
D.
Guerra
,
S. F.
Schwarz
and
S. da Silveira
Bender
,
Sci. Agric.
74
,
371
377
(
2017
).
5.
G.
Distefano
,
A.
Gentile
and
M.
Herrero
,
Ann. Bot.
108
,
499
509
(
2011
).
6.
A.
Vardi
,
I.
Levin
and
N.
Carmi
,
J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.
133
,
117
126
(
2008
).
7.
A.
Bermejo
,
J.
Pardo
and
A.
Cano
,
Food Nutr. Sci.
02
,
169
180
(
2011
).
8.
K. S. T.
Irenaeus
and
S. K.
Mitra
,
J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual.
87
,
157
167
(
2014
).
9.
G.
Distefano
,
A.
Hedhly
,
G. Las
Casas
,
S. La
Malfa
,
M.
Herrero
and
A.
Gentile
,
Sci. Hortic.
140
,
1
7
(
2012
).
10.
G.
Gambetta
,
A.
Gravina
,
C.
Fasiolo
,
C.
Fornero
,
S.
Galiger
,
C.
Inzaurralde
and
F.
Rey
,
Sci. Hortic.
164
,
183
188
(
2013
).
11.
D. H.
Firmage
and
A.
Dafni
,
Acta Hortic.
561
,
87
94
(
2001
).
12.
B. D.
Mariana
,
H.
Arisah
,
Yenni
and
M.
Selvawajayanti
,
Biodiversitas
19
,
706
711
(
2018
).
13.
A. S.
Khalil
,
A.
Sattar
and
R.
Zamir
,
Afr. J. Biotechnol.
10
,
14562
14565
(
2011
).
14.
O.
Gulsen
,
A.
Uzun
,
H.
Pala
,
E.
Canihos
and
G.
Kafa
,
Sci. Hortic.
112
,
184
190
(
2007
).
15.
H. C.
Cavalcante
,
M. T.
Schifino-Wittmann
and
A. L. C.
Dornelles
,
Sci. Hortic.
86
,
103
114
(
2000
).
16.
J. L.
Brewbaker
and
B. H.
Kwack
,
Am. J. Bot.
50
,
859
(
1963
).
17.
N. P.
Mendez
and
F. M.
Acma
,
J. Trop. Life Sci.
8
,
303
310
(
2018
).
18.
T.
Higashiyama
and
H.
Takeuchi
,
Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.
66
,
393
413
(
2015
).
19.
E. G.
Moghadam
,
P.
Hosseini
and
A.
Mokhtarian
,
Sci. Hortic.
123
,
29
33
(
2009
).
20.
F.
Yulianti
and
D.
Agisimanto
, “Mekanisme pembentukan jeruk SoE seedless hasil induksi radiasi sinar gamma,” in
Iptek Hortikultura No. 12
(
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hortikultura
,
Jakarta
,
2016
), p.
36
38
.
21.
C. N.
Inyama
,
V. U. N.
Osuoha
,
F. N.
Mbagwu
and
C. M.
Duru
,
Med. Aromat. Plants
04
,
3
5
(
2015
).
22.
S. A.
Khan
and
A.
Perveen
,
Pakistan J. Bot.
46
,
951
956
(
2014
).
23.
J.
Lora
,
J. I.
Hormaza
and
M.
Herrero
,
Front. Plant Sci.
7
,
1
12
(
2016
).
24.
G. W.
Aprilia
,
S.
Ashari
and
B. D.
Mariana
,
J. Prod. Tanam.
6
,
341
349
(
2018
).
25.
J. L.
Knapp
,
L. J.
Bartlett
and
J. L.
Osborne
,
J. Appl. Ecol.
54
,
1171
1179
(
2017
).
26.
A. K.
Gupta
,
M.
Singh
,
E. S.
Marboh
,
V.
Nath
,
A.
Pongener
and
A. K. D.
Anal
,
Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci.
6
,
270
278
(
2017
).
27.
A.
Imani
,
M.
Kargar
,
S.
Pireivatlou
and
F.
Asgari
,
Int. J. Nurs Relat. Sci.
2,
21
26
(
2011
).
28.
N. P.
Chacoff
and
M. A.
Aizen
,
Crop Sci.
47
,
1143
1150
(
2007
).
29.
J.
Atlagić
,
S.
Terzić
and
A.
Marjanović-Jeromela
,
Ind. Crops Prod.
35
,
88
91
(
2012
).
30.
M. K.
Wojciechowicz
,
L.
Zarychta
and
E.
Zenkteler
,
Acta Soc. Bot. Pol.
85
,
1
12
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.