A new way to illustrate digital radiographies issued from flat panel detectors is suggested. It is based on studying the noise distribution occurred in radiography through multiple histograms for each experimental real radiography with low dose exposure then generated in non-noisy image to create an artificial noisy image, and finally validate the similarity of the pair real/artificial noisy image with the real underexposed radiography achieved in same exposure conditions. The quantum noise is based on the hypothesis that it consists the major contribution between all kinds of noise caused by quantum sink in photon counting process. Indeed, despite all research confirm the dominance of quantum noise in low- dose radiography[1], but other type of noise coming from the detectors after a gain factor and from screen electronics consist also a considerable noise known as "impulsive noise"[2]. The sum off all these noise type is considered in order to draw the real noise distribution, and in a forward step, have the capacity to train correctly a convenient neural network giving as output a maximum de-noised radiography.

1.
A. R.
Mistry
,
D. Uzbelger
Feldman
,
J.
Yang
, and
E.
Ryterski
, “
Low Dose X-Ray Sources and High Quantum Efficiency Sensors: The Next Challenge in Dental Digital Imaging?
,”
Radiol. Res. Pract.
, vol.
2014
, pp.
1
7
,
2014
, doi: .
2.
I.
Frosio
, Member, IEEE, and
N. A.
Borghese
*, Member, “Statistical Based Impulsive Noise Removal in Digital Rdiography,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
, vol.
28
,
2009
.
3.
A.
Dorsival
, “
Implementation of ALARA principle at CERN.
4.
B. A.
Arnold
and
P. O.
Scheibe
, “
Noise analysis of a digital radiography system
,”
Am. J. Roentgenol.
, vol.
142
, no.
3
, pp.
609
613
,
1984
, doi: .
5.
J.-P.
Moy
and
B.
Bosset
, “How does real offset and gain correction affect the DQE in images from x-ray flat detectors?,”
Med. Imaging 1999 Phys. Med. Imaging
, vol.
3659
, no. February, pp.
90
97
,
1999
.
6.
P. A.
Oakley
and
D. E.
Harrison
, “
Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector
,”
Dose-Response
, vol.
18
, no.
2
, pp.
1
-
12
, 2020, doi: .
7.
M.
Nishiki
,
K.
Shiraishi
,
T.
Sakaguchi
, and
K.
Nambu
, “
Method for reducing noise in X-ray images by averaging pixels based on the normalized difference with the relevant pixel
.,"
Radiol. Phys. Technol.
, vol.
1
, no.
2
, pp.
188
195
,
2008
, doi: .
8.
L.
Yang
,
W.
Chen
,
W.
Liu
,
B.
Zha
, and
L.
Zhu
, “
Random Noise Attenuation Based on Residual Convolutional Neural Network in Seismic Datasets
,”
IEEE Access
, vol.
8
, pp.
30271
30286
,
2020
, doi: .
9.
P.
Liu
,
X.
Zhou
,
J.
Yang
, E. B. M. D, and
R.
Fang
, “
Image Restoration Using Deep Regulated Convolutional Networks
,”
2019
, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08853.
10.
J.
Xie
,
L.
Xu
, and
E.
Chen
, “Image denoising and inpainting with deep neural networks,”
Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.
, vol.
1
, pp.
341
349
,
2012
.
11.
L.
Cao
and
P.
Jorg
, “
A Practical Non-linear Gain Correction Method for High-resolution CMOS Imaging Detectors,
” no. May, pp.
3
4
,
2008
.
12.
F. D.
Sowby
, “
Annals of the ICRP
,”
Ann. ICRP
, vol.
6
, no.
1
, p.
1
,
1981
, doi: .
13.
D. W.
Mah
,
J. A.
Rowlands
, and
J. A.
Rawlinson
, “
Measurement of quantum noise in fluoroscopic systems for portal imaging
,”
Med. Phys.
, vol.
23
, no.
2
, pp.
231
238
,
1996
, doi: .
14.
C. V.
Zwirewich
,
J. R.
Mayo
, and
N. L.
Muller
, “
Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma
,”
Radiology
, vol.
180
, no.
2
, pp.
413
417
,
1991
, doi: .
15.
K. H.
Cho
, “
Boltzmann machines and denoising autoencoders for image denoising
,”
1st Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. ICLR 2013 - Work. Track Proc.
, pp.
1
14
,
2013
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.