The research paper deals with the polypropylene modified bituminous obtained by different mixing methods and their Marshallproperties.Dry, Wet and control marshal samples were assembled with VG-30 grade of binder and fine graded aggregates of bituminous concrete coat (>13.5mm). Polypropylene which was used for modification is a class V or thermo plastic plastomer. Three altered bitumen samples having 1,3 and 5% PP by weight of binder were used for wet test. The binder test was conducted and results were compared with normal binder and polymer altered bitumen and finally Marshall Properties of Marshall Sample (wet process) prepared by modified binder was observed. In dry process polymer was added with aggregates, which is formed by polypropylene mixed with aggregates by1, 3 and 5% aggregates by weight. The thermodynamic and visco-elastic properties alter in wet process and the polymer added enhances the hardness of binder while the polymer alters coating ability during mixing in dry process. Thus Marshall Properties changes in both wet and dry process. The test conducted with bitumen and modified binder and control Marshall Test of dry and wet process concludes that the results of dry process are far better than wet process. This paper looks into the mixing process, their advantages and disadvantages, its importance, mechanism dealing with physical and chemical changes.

1.
The Shell Bitumen Handbook
,” 6th Edition by
Dr Robert N.
Hunter
,
Andy Self and Professor John
2.
L.
Polytechnic
,
“POLYMER MODIFIED BITUMEN : REVIEW
,” vol.
10
, no.
4
,
2016
.
3.
P.
Ahmedzade
,
K.
Demirelli
,
T.
Günay
,
F.
Biryan
, and
O.
Alqudah
, “
Effects of Waste Polypropylene Additive on the Properties of Bituminous Binder
,”
Procedia Manuf
., vol.
2
, no. February, pp.
165
170
,
2015
.
4.
A. D.
Drozdov
,
J. D. E. C.
Christiansen
,
R.
Klitkou
, and
C. G.
Potarniche
, “
Viscoelasticity and viscoplasticity of polypropylene/polyethylene blends
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct
., vol.
47
, no.
18–19
, pp.
2498
2507
,
2010
.
5.
N. Z.
Habib
,
I.
Kamaruddin
,
M.
Napiah
, and
I. M.
Tan
, “
Effect of Mixing Process on Polypropylene Modified Bituminous Concrete Mix Properties
,”
Int. J. Civ. Environ. Eng.
, vol.
5
, no.
10
, pp.
477
482
,
2011
.
6.
S.
Moubark
,
F.
Khodary
, and
A.
Othman
, “
Evaluation of Mechanical properties for polypropylene Modified Asphalt concrete Mixtures
,”
Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag.
, vol.
5
, no.
12
, pp.
7797
7801
,
2017
.
7.
J.
Zhu
,
B.
Birgisson
, and
N.
Kringos
, “
Polymer modification of bitumen: Advances and challenges
,”
Eur. Polym. J.
, vol.
54
, no.
1
, pp.
18
38
,
2014
.
8.
G.
Polacco
,
S.
Filippi
,
F.
Merusi
, and
G.
Stastna
, “
A review of the fundamentals of polymer-modified asphalts: Asphalt/polymer interactions and principles of
9.
J. S.
Chen
,
P. H.
Kuo
,
P. S.
Lin
,
C. C.
Huang
, and
K. Y.
Lin
, “
Experimental and theoretical characterization of the engineering behavior of bitumen mixed with mineral filler
,”
Mater. Struct.Constr
., vol.
41
, no.
6
, pp.
1015
1024
,
2008
.
10.
Paving Bitumen” IS-73(2013), BIS
,
2013
11.
MORTH 5th REVISION.pdf
.”
12.
T.
McNally
, “
Introduction to polymer modified bitumen (PmB)
,”
Polym. Modif.Bitum
., pp. 1–21,
2011
.
13.
C. Oliviero
Rossi
,
A.
Spadafora
,
B.
Teltayev
,
G.
Izmailova
,
Y.
Amerbayev
, and
V.
Bortolotti
, “
Polymer modified bitumen: Rheological properties and structural characterization
,”
Colloids Surfaces APhysicochem. Eng. Asp
., vol.
480
, pp.
390
397
,
2015
.
14.
I.
Gaweł
,
J.
Piłat
,
P.
Radziszewski
,
K. J.
Kowalski
, and
J. B.
Król
, “
Rubber modified bitumen
,”
Polym. Modif.Bitum
., pp.
72
97
,
2011
.
15.
C.
Gallegos
and
M.
García-Morales
, “
Rheology of polymer-modified bitumens
,”
Polym. Modif.Bitum
., pp.
197
237
,
2011
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.