A dental implant’s success and survival rate is often affected by the complexities involved during the dental implantation. This has led the dental implant research towards the techniques and ideas in minimizing the complexities during surgery and increasing the survival. The implantation involving the unavailability of bone quantity must be treated with a solution of complicated bone augmentation techniques. Short implants are now considered as a viable alternative to these complicated techniques. The emphasis of this review article has been on the information about the various influences that govern the success of short implants. It is important to consider the various biomechanical factors and prosthetic design parameters so as to avoid the failure of short implants. Also, several Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) of short implants have been considered that experimentally test the effectiveness of short implants. A review of FEA studies has been included that give the solution for difficult problems involving complex geometries. Thus, a detailed understanding of the short implants would help the dentist to decide the length and diameter of the short implants which are important parameters. This can also help in reducing the complex surgical procedures. However, further research is necessary so as to see how the variation in several factors at the same time affects the survival rate and success of short implants.

1.
S. R.
Schwartz
, “
Short Implants
,”
Dent. Clin. North Am.
, vol.
64
, no.
2
, pp.
279
290
, Apr.
2020
, doi: .
2.
P.
Dhatrak
,
U.
Shirsat
,
S.
Sumanth
, and
V.
Deshmukh
, “
Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Investigations on Stress Distribution of Dental Implants around Implant-Bone Interface
,”
Mater. Today Proc.
, vol.
5
, no.
2
, pp.
5641
5648
,
2018
, doi: .
3.
S.
Kim
 et al., “
A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Short Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla
,”
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants
, vol.
29
, no.
2
, pp.
e155
e164
,
2014
, doi: .
4.
S.-H.
Chang
,
C.-L.
Lin
,
S.-S.
Hsue
,
Y.-S.
Lin
, and
S.-R.
Huang
, “
Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
, vol.
34
, no.
2
, pp.
153
160
, Mar.
2012
, doi: .
5.
A.
Shah
, “
Short implants - When, where and how?
,”
J. Int. Clin. Dent. Res. Organ.
, vol.
7
, no.
3
, p.
132
,
2015
, doi: .
6.
M.
Amine
,
Y.
Guelzim
,
S.
Benfaida
,
A.
Bennani
, and
A.
Andoh
, “
Short implants (5–8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: Systematic review
,”
J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
, vol.
120
, no.
2
, pp.
133
142
, Apr.
2019
, doi: .
7.
S.-K.
Chuang
and
C.-T.
Lee
, “
Short Implants Might be a Predictable Treatment Alternative to Long Implants Which Often Require Additional Augmentation Procedures
,”
J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract.
, vol.
13
, no.
2
, pp.
45
46
, Jun.
2013
, doi: .
8.
P. N.
Uehara
,
V. H.
Matsubara
,
F.
Igai
,
N.
Sesma
,
M. K.
Mukai
, and
M. G.
Araujo
, “
Short Dental Implants (≤7mm) Versus Longer Implants in Augmented Bone Area: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
,”
Open Dent. J.
, vol.
12
, no.
1
, pp.
354
365
, Apr.
2018
, doi: .
9.
N.
Kang
,
Y.
Wu
,
P.
Gong
,
L.
Yue
, and
G.
Ou
, “
A study of force distribution of loading stresses on implant–bone interface on short implant length using 3-dimensional finite element analysis
,”
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.
, vol.
118
, no.
5
, pp.
519
523
, Nov.
2014
, doi: .
10.
A.-H.
Muhamad
,
C.
Georges
, and
A.
Azzaldeen
, “
Short implants in clinical practice
”,
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS)
e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume
16
, Issue
5
Ver. XI (May.
2017
), PP
89
96
, DOI: .
11.
C. A. A.
Lemos
,
M. L.
Ferro-Alves
,
R.
Okamoto
,
M. R.
Mendonça
, and
E. P.
Pellizzer
, “
Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis
,”
J. Dent.
, vol.
47
, pp.
8
17
, Apr.
2016
, doi: .
12.
M.
Chiapasco
,
P.
Casentini
, and
M.
Zaniboni
, “
Bone Augmentation Procedures in Implant Dentistry
”,
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants
· January 2009,
2009
;
24
Suppl:
237
59
.
13.
I.
Hasan
,
F.
Heinemann
,
M.
Aitlahrach
, and
C.
Bourauel
, “
Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant
,”
Biomed. Tech. Eng.
, vol.
55
, no.
6
, pp.
341
350
, Jan.
2010
, doi: .
14.
I.
Karthikeyan
,
S.
Desai
, and
R.
Singh
, “
Short implants: A systematic review
,”
J. Indian Soc. Periodontol.
, vol.
16
, no.
3
, p.
302
,
2012
, doi: .
15.
R.
Pistilli
 et al., “
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial
,”
Eur J Oral Implant.
,
2013
;
6
(
4
):
358
372
.
16.
F.
Graziani
,
N.
Donos
,
I.
Needleman
,
M.
Gabriele
, and
M.
Tonetti
, “
Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
15
, no.
6
, pp.
677
682
, Dec.
2004
, doi: .
17.
N.
Puthukkat
,
Kk.
Shenoy
,
Sv.
Bhat
, and
S.
Shetty
, “
Short implants: A new dimension in rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla and mandible
,”
J. Interdiscip. Dent.
, vol.
4
, no.
2
, p.
66
,
2014
, doi: .
18.
F.
Renouard
and
D.
Nisand
, “
Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
17
, no.
S2
, pp.
35
51
, Oct.
2006
, doi: .
19.
N.
Jain
, “
Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry
,”
J. Clin. Diagn. Res.
,
2016
, doi: .
20.
E. P.
Chizolini
,
A. C.
Rossi
,
A. R.
Freire
,
M. R.
Perussi
,
P. H. F.
Caria
, and
F. B.
Prado
, “
Short implants in oral rehabilitation
”, RSBO, Printed version: 1806-7727, Electronic version: 1984-5685,
RSBO.
2011
Jul-Sep;
8
(
3
):
329
34
.
21.
G.
Telleman
,
G. M.
Raghoebar
,
A.
Vissink
,
L.
den Hartog
,
J. J. R. Huddleston
Slater
, and
H. J. A.
Meijer
, “
A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient: Systematic review of short dental implants
,”
J. Clin. Periodontol.
, vol.
38
, no.
7
, pp.
667
676
, Jul.
2011
, doi: .
22.
E.
Bressan
,
S.
Sivolella
,
Z. A.
Urrutia
,
L. A.
Salata
,
N. P.
Lang
, and
D.
Botticelli
, “
Short implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
23
, no.
5
, pp.
536
541
, May
2012
, doi: .
23.
C. E.
Misch
,
J.
Steigenga
,
E.
Barboza
,
F.
Misch-Dietsh
,
L. J.
Cianciola
, and
C.
Kazor
, “
Short Dental Implants in Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Multicenter Retrospective 6-Year Case Series Study
,”
J. Periodontol.
, vol.
77
, no.
8
, pp.
1340
1347
, Aug.
2006
, doi: .
24.
A.
Ali
, “
Short dental implants: An emerging concept in implant treatment
,”
QUINTESSENCE Int.
, vol.
45
, no.
6
, p.
16
,
2014
.
25.
Pankaj
Dhatrak
,
Uddhav
Shirsat
,
Vijay
Deshmukh
, “
Fatigue Life Prediction of Commercial Dental Implants Based on Biomechanical Parameters: A Review
”,
Journal of Materials Science & Surface Engineering
Vol.
3
(
2
),
2015
, pp
221
226
.
26.
L.
Himmlová
,
T.
Dostálová
,
A.
Kácovský
, and
S.
Konvi
 ková, “
Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis
,”
J. Prosthet. Dent.
, vol.
91
, no.
1
, pp.
20
25
, Jan.
2004
, doi: .
27.
C. S.
Petrie
and
J. L.
Williams
, “
Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest: A three-dimensional finite-element analysis
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
16
, no.
4
, pp.
486
494
, Aug.
2005
, doi: .
28.
H.
Abuhussein
,
G.
Pagni
,
A.
Rebaudi
, and
H.-L.
Wang
, “
The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
21
, no.
2
, pp.
129
136
, Feb.
2010
, doi: .
29.
P.
Shetty
,
P.
Yadav
,
M.
Tahir
, and
V.
Saini
, “
Implant Design and Stress Distribution
,”
Int. J. Oral Implantol. Clin. Res.
, vol.
7
, no.
2
, pp.
34
39
, Aug.
2016
, doi: .
30.
G.
Tawil
,
N.
Aboujaoude
, and
R.
Younan
, “Influence of Prosthetic Parameters on the Survival and Complication Rates of Short Implants,” vol.
21
, no.
2
, p.
9
,
2005
.
31.
Fábio Ferreira de Souza Abbott
Galvão
 et. al. “
Predictability of short dental implants: a literature review
.”,
RSBO.
2011
Jan-Mar;
8
(
1
):
74
80
.
32.
P. A.
Fugazzotto
,
J. R.
Beagle
,
J.
Ganeles
,
R.
Jaffin
,
J.
Vlassis
, and
A.
Kumar
, “
Success and Failure Rates of 9 mm or Shorter Implants in the Replacement of Missing Maxillary Molars When Restored with Individual Crowns: Preliminary Results 0 to 84 Months in Function. A Retrospective Study
,”
J. Periodontol.
, vol.
75
, no.
2
, pp.
327
332
, Feb.
2004
, doi: .
33.
J. F.
Valera-Jiménez
,
G.
Burgueño-Barris
,
S.
Gómez-González
,
J.
López-López
,
E.
Valmaseda-Castellón
, and
E.
Fernández-Aguado
, “
Finite element analysis of narrow dental implants
,”
Dent. Mater.
, vol.
36
, no.
7
, pp.
927
935
, Jul.
2020
, doi: .
34.
Ciarmatori
 et al. - 2007 - “
Critical review of literature on the use of short implants
”,
Journal of Osseointegration
,
2018
;
10
(
3
):
87
94
, DOI: .
35.
M. B.
Toniollo
,
A. P.
Macedo
,
D.
Pupim
, and
D.
Zaparolli
, “
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Surface Stress Distribution on Regular and Short Morse Taper Implants Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges
,”
J. Craniofac. Surg.
, vol.
27
, no.
3
, p.
5
,
2016
.
36.
D. S. M.
de Castro
 et al., “
Comparative Histological and Histomorphometrical Evaluation of Marginal Bone Resorption Around External Hexagon and Morse Cone Implants: An Experimental Study in Dogs
,”
Implant Dent.
, vol.
23
, no.
3
, pp.
270
276
, Jun.
2014
, doi: .
37.
Y.
Maeda
,
T.
Satoh
, and
M.
Sogo
, “
In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication
,”
J. Oral Rehabil.
, vol.
33
, no.
1
, pp.
75
78
, Jan.
2006
, doi:
38.
Huh
Yoon-Hyuk
,
Ko
Kyung-Ho
,
Park
Chan-Jin
,
Cho
Lee-Ra
, “
Axial displacements of cemented prosthesis in different implant-abutment connections
”,
Clin Oral Impl Res.
2017
;
28
(Suppl. 14),
39.
H.
Stallard
, “
Functions of the Occlusal Surfaces of the Teeth
J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1922
, vol.
13
, no.
10
, pp.
1392
1412
, Oct.
1926
, doi: .
40.
M.
Kabisch
,
C.
Ruckes
,
M.
Seibert-Grafe
, and
M.
Blettner
, “
Randomized Controlled Trials
,”
Dtsch. Aerzteblatt Online
, Sep.
2011
, doi: .
41.
E.
Hariton
and
J. J.
Locascio
, “
Randomised controlled trials - the gold standard for effectiveness research: Study design: randomised controlled trials
,”
BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
, vol.
125
, no.
13
, pp.
1716
1716
, Dec.
2018
, doi: .
42.
P.
Papaspyridakos
,
A.
Souza
,
K.
Vazouras
,
H.
Gholami
,
S.
Pagni
, and
H.
Weber
, “
Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
29
, no.
S16
, pp.
8
20
, Oct.
2018
, doi: .
43.
M.
Esposito
,
G.
Pellegrino
,
R.
Pistilli
, and
P.
Felice
, “
Rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial
,”
Eur J Oral Implant.
,
2011
;
4
(
1
):
21
30
.
44.
M.
Esposito
,
C.
Barausse
,
R.
Pistilli
,
G.
Sammartino
,
G.
Grandi
, and
P.
Felice
, “
Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial
,”
Eur J Oral Implant.
,
2015
;
8
(
3
):
257
268
.
45.
G. P.
Schincaglia
 et al., “
Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading
,”
J. Clin. Periodontol.
, vol.
42
, no.
11
, pp.
1042
1051
, Nov.
2015
, doi: .
46.
D. S.
Thoma
,
R.
Haas
,
M.
Tutak
,
A.
Garcia
,
G. P.
Schincaglia
, and
C. H. F.
Hämmerle
, “
Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading
,”
J. Clin. Periodontol.
, vol.
42
, no.
1
, pp.
72
80
, Jan.
2015
, doi: .
47.
X.-M.
Zhang
,
J.-Y.
Shi
,
Y.-X.
Gu
,
S.-C.
Qiao
,
J.-J.
Mo
, and
H.-C.
Lai
, “
Clinical Investigation and Patient Satisfaction of Short Implants Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Pilot Randomized Trial: Short Dental Implants
,”
Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.
, vol.
19
, no.
1
, pp.
161
166
, Feb.
2017
, doi: .
48.
Cannizzaro
,
G.
,
Felice
,
P.
,
Buti
,
J.
,
Leone
,
M.
,
Ferri
,
V.
, &
Esposito
,
M.
, “
Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed supershort or long implants: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial.”, March
2015
,
European Journal of Oral Implantology
,
8
,
27
36
.
49.
Romeo
,
E.
,
Storelli
,
S.
,
Casano
,
G.
,
Scanferla
,
M.
, &
Botticelli
,
D
, “
Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.”, November
2014
,
European Journal of Oral Implantology
,
7
(
4
),
371
381
.
50.
A.
Al-Hashedi
,
T.
Taiyeb-Ali
, and
N.
Yunus
, “
Outcomes of placing short implants in the posterior mandible: a preliminary randomized controlled trial
,”
Aust. Dent. J.
, vol.
61
, no.
2
, pp.
208
218
, Jun.
2016
, doi: .
51.
V.
Pohl
 et al., “
Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial
,”
J. Clin. Periodontol.
, vol.
44
, no.
4
, pp.
438
445
, Apr.
2017
, doi: .
52.
P.
Sahrmann
 et. al, “
Success of 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A 3-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
”,
Journal of Dental Research
95
(
6
), February
2016
; DOI:10.1177/0022034516633432.
53.
S.
Bechara
,
R.
Kubilius
,
G.
Veronesi
,
J. T.
Pires
,
J. A.
Shibli
, and
F. G.
Mangano
, “
Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (≥10-mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
28
, no.
9
, pp.
1097
1107
, Sep.
2017
, doi: .
54.
Felice
,
P.
,
Checchi
,
L.
,
Barausse
,
C.
, Pistilli, “
Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0×4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
,” in
European Journal of Oral Implantology
,
9
,
35
45
., March
2015
.
55.
F.
Rossi
,
D.
Botticelli
,
G.
Cesaretti
,
E.
De Santis
,
S.
Storelli
, and
N. P.
Lang
, “
Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study
,”
Clin. Oral Implants Res.
, vol.
27
, no.
4
, pp.
458
464
, Apr.
2016
, doi: .
56.
P.
Felice
,
R.
Pistilli
,
C.
Barausse
,
V.
Bruno
,
A.
Trullenque-Eriksson
, and
M.
Esposito
, “
Short implants as an alternative to crestal sinus lift: A 1-year multicentre randomised controlled trial
,”
Eur J Oral Implant.
8
(
4
):
375
-
384
, December
2015
.
57.
Esposito
,
M.
,
Pistilli
,
R.
,
Barausse
,
C.
, &
Felice
,
P.
(
2014
), “
Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws
.,” in
European Journal of Oral Implantology
,
7
,
383
395
., December
2014
.
58.
P.
Felice
,
R.
Pistilli
,
M.
Piattelli
,
E.
Soardi
,
V.
Corvino
, and
M.
Esposito
, “
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5×5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial
,”
Eur J Oral Implant.
,
5
(
2
):
149
-
61
, August
2012
.
59.
Pankaj
Dhatrak
&
Vedant
Girme
&
Uddhav
Shirsat
&
S.
Sumanth
&
Vijay
Deshmukh
, “
Significance of Orthotropic Material Models to Predict Stress Around Bone-Implant Interface Using Numerical Simulation
”, (
2019
); .
60.
J.-P.
Geng
,
K. B. C.
Tan
, and
G.-R.
Liu
, “
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature
,”
J. Prosthet. Dent.
, vol.
85
, no.
6
, pp.
585
598
, Jun.
2001
, doi: .
61.
Pankaj
Dhatrak
,
Uddhav
Shirsat
,
S.
Sumanth
,
Vijay
Deshmukh
, “
Numerical investigation on stress intensity around Bone-Implant interface by 3-Dimensional FEA and experimental verification by optical technique
”, ,
2020
.
62.
S.
Desai
,
R.
Singh
,
I.
Karthikeyan
,
G.
Reetika
, and Jyothilaxmi, “
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of effect of prosthetic materials and short implant biomechanics on D4 bone under immediate loading
,”
J. Dent. Implants
, vol.
2
, no.
1
, p.
2
,
2012
, doi: .
63.
R.
Stegaroiu
,
T.
Sato
,
H.
Kusakari
, and
O.
Miyakawa
, “
Influence of Restoration Type on Stress Distribution in Bone Around Implants: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
,” p.
9
,
2000
.
64.
V.
Demenko
,
I.
Linetskiy
,
L.
Linetska
, and
O.
Yefremov
, “
Load-carrying capacity of short implants in edentulous posterior maxilla: A finite element study
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
, vol.
71
, pp.
30
37
, Sep.
2019
, doi: .
65.
S. L. D.
de Moraes
 et al., “
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Varying Diameter and Connection Type in Implants with High Crown-Implant Ratio
,”
Braz. Dent. J.
, vol.
29
, no.
1
, pp.
36
42
, Feb.
2018
, doi: .
66.
T.
Li
 et al., “
Analysis of the biomechanical feasibility of a wide implant in moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region with finite element method
,”
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.
, vol.
114
, no.
2
, pp.
e1
e8
, Aug.
2012
, doi: .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.