Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a general consumption tax imposed on goods and services. In the face of an increasingly challenging economic performance, the government’s deteriorating revenue and stagnant investment levels have resulted in a deficit. Besides reliance on oil and gas revenue, Malaysian therefore has implemented GST at 6 per cent in April 2015. In this paper, we use a generally equilibrium model (CGE) to examine the wider macroeconomic impact on this GST policy. We found that while GST increased government revenue and brings about 2 per cent increase in real Growth Domestic Product (GDP), it manages to handle investment levels. Additionally, GST leads to increase the fixed investment and in real consumption and the welfare through declining of consumer price index by 0.2 per cent. As GST is excluded from exports of domestically manufactured products, the impact of six per cent of GST is increased by the export of goods and services produced domestically. On the other hand, a decline in real production is inevitable, provided a decrease in personal disposable earnings, real investment and consumption, the food and beverages and accommodation sector will see the greatest decrease in production by -0.34 per cent and the information and communication 0.24 per cent. While the import impact of GST, we can see the percentage of changes are slightly small rather than export. This statement coincides with the results found showing that imports are exceeding the exports. In this highlight, the ideas on the implementation of GST is to upgrade the government tax collecting mechanism and beneficially to contribute to national GDP.

1.
Central Bank of Malaysia
, “Annual report 2014,” (
Malaysia
,
2014
).
2.
Ministry Finance Malaysia
, “Ministry of Finance Malaysia - Economic Report 2015/2016,” (
Malaysia
,
2015
).
3.
C.
Wong
,
U.
Tunku
and
A.
Rahman
, “Good-bye GST, Hello SST for Malaysia : In Search of Efficiency Equivalence” (
Malaysia
.
2018
).
4.
C.
Ebeke
and
H.
Ehrhart
,
J. Afr. Econ.
21
,
1
27
(
2012
).
5.
M.
Keen
and
B.
Lockwood
,
J. Dev. Econ.
92
,
138
151
(
2010
).
6.
M.
Smart
,
C.
Ms
, and
R. M.
Bird
,
Natl. Tax J.
591
609
(
2009
).
7.
M.
Keen
,
Natl. Tax J.
,
66
,
423
446
(
2013
).
8.
D. S.
Go
,
M.
Kearney
,
S.
Robinson
and
K.
Thierfelder
, “An analysis of South Africa’s value added tax” (
The World Bank
,
2005
).
9.
B.
Hamilton
and
J.
Whalley
,.
Can J Econ
,
561
575
. (
1989
).
10.
S.
Devarajan
and
S.
Robinson
,
Front. Appl. Gen. Equilib. Model.
1
21
(
2002
).
11.
O.
Ajakaiye
,
The African Economic Research Consortium
,
6
17
(
1999
).
12.
G. A.
Meagher
,
P. D.
Adams
, and
J. M.
Horridge
, “Applied General Equilibrium Modelling and Labour Market Forecasting” (
Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS
),
2000
).
13.
S.
Saidi
, and
M.
Harun
, Goods and Services Tax (GST) Transition to Sales and Services Tax (SST): Impact on the Welfare of B40 and M40 Households in Malaysia" (
Springer
,
Singapore
,
2020
).
14.
E.
Okyere
and
R. K.
Bhattarai
, “Welfare and Growth Impacts Of Taxes : Applied General Equilibrium Models of Ghana" (
University Of Hull
,
Business School
,
2005
).
15.
P. B.
Dixon
,
R. B.
Koopman
, and
M. T.
Rimmer
, The MONASH Style of Computable General Equilibrium Modelling: A Framework for Practical Policy Analysis” (
Elsevier
,
2013
).
16.
P. K.
Narayan
,
Narayan
,
P. K.
Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies
,
15
,
226
236
(
2003
).
17.
D. R.
Carroll
,
R.
Cline
,
T.
Neubig
,
Y.
Llp
,
D. J.
Diamond
, and
G.
Zodrow
, “The Macroeconomic Effects of an Add-on Value Added Tax Prepared " (
Ernst & Young LLP
,
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.