Hydrokinetic turbine is usually used to convert the kinetic energy from flowing fluid into electricity. It is a useful tool for converting renewable energy sources from hydropower application. Performance of the turbine is very much depending on the fluid dynamics of flow around the turbine. Computational fluid dynamics modelling is one of the methods for fluid dynamics investigation but finding the best models to be used to solve for dynamic change of flow around turbine is difficult. Models should be solved with guidance from real life data (experimental) and finding perfect match between flow physics, numerical methods and experimentally measured data is always challenging leading to difficulty in many design processes. In this paper, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model investigation was done based on published experimental work. A hydrokinetic water turbine was drawn using the MHKF1-180 and NACA4418 foils dimensions. The models were solved using Turbo mode in the commercial software of ANSYS CFX. Two commonly used Reynolds-Average-Navier-Stokes (RANS) models were solved; the k-model and the SST k-model. The results show that the SST k-model is a more suitable model for the hydrokinetic turbine as investigated in this paper. The finding reported in this paper helps future modelling effort so that accurate predictions of fluid dynamics across hydrokinetic turbine could be achieved.

1.
E. D.
Coyle
and
R. A.
Simmons
, “Understanding the Global Energy Crisis” (
Purdue University Press
,
2014
).
2.
R. G.
Newell
,
D.
Raimi
and
G.
Aldana
, “
Global Energy Outlook 2019: The Next Generation of Energy
” (
Washington
,
2019
).
4.
E.
Dick
, “
Fundamentals of Turbomachines
” (
Springer
,
Netherlands
,
2015
).
5.
R. S. R.
Gorla
and
A. A.
Khan
, “
Turbomachinery Design and Theory
” (New York,
2003
).
7.
W.
Tian
,
Z.
Mao
and
H.
Ding
,
Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng.
10
,
782
793
(
2018
).
8.
M. I.
Yuce
and
A.
Muratoglu
,
Renew. Sustain. Energy
43
,
72
82
(
2015
).
9.
D.
Kumar
and
S.
Sarkar
,
Renew. Sustain. Energy
58
,
796
813
(
2016
).
10.
W. F.
Florez-Escobar
,
C. A.
Brebbia
,
F.
Chejne
and
F.
Mondragon
, “Energy and sustainability VI, VI. ed.” (
WIT Press
,
Southampton
,
2015
).
11.
P.
Duvoy
and
H.
Toniolo
,
Comput. Geosci.
39
,
171
181
(
2012
).
12.
M. Badrul
Salleh
,
N. M.
Kamaruddin
and
Z.
Mohamed-Kassim
,
Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments
36
,
100554
(
2019
).
13.
Y. A.
Cengel
and
J. M.
Cimbala
, “Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications” (
McGraw Hill Asia
,
2014
).
14.
P.
Aghsaee
and
C. D.
Markfort
,
Renew. Energy
,
125
,
620
629
(
2018
).
15.
H.
Shiu
,
E.
Johnson
,
M.
Barone
,
R.
Phillips
,
W.
Straka
,
A.
Fontaine
and
M.
Jonson
, “
A Design of A Hydrofoil Family for Current-Driven Marine-Hydrokinetic Turbines
” (
20th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering and the ASME 2012 Power Conference
,
2012
), pp.
839
847
.
16.
J.
Liu
,
H.
Lin
and
S. R.
Purimitla
,
Ocean Eng.
117
,
383
397
(
2016
).
17.
P. A. S. F.
Silva
,
T. F.
De Oliveira
,
A. C. P. Brasil
Junior
and
J. R. P.
Vaz
,
An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.
88
,
2441
2456
(
2016
).
18.
N.
Kolekar
,
S. S.
Mukherji
and
A.
Banerjee
, “
Numerical Modeling and Optimization of Hydrokinetic
” (
5th International Conference of Energy Sustainability
,
2011
), pp.
1
8
.
19.
D.
Kumar
and
S.
Sarkar
,
Energy
116
,
609
618
(
2016
).
20.
A.
Muratoglu
and
M. I.
Yuce
,
J. Energy Eng.
143
,
1
11
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.