Evaluation of laboratory experiences of engineering and engineering technology students has led to an increasing in the attention being paid to the development of students’ psychomotor skills. One of the reasons that psychomotor seems to be less important in the past is because of the lack of suitable measuring tools despite it is important in the engineering and engineering technology course. Furthermore, a current assessment which is using report and test to evaluate the experience of student practice in the laboratory only help in assessing students’ knowledge in cognitive skill. Thus, a new study method is needed to focus on evaluating engineering technology students in terms of their understanding of the component called ‘hands-on practical experience’ during their practical skill classes or experiment. The existing technique for evaluating psychomotor abilities that have emerged from attempts to improve selection in recruitment processes may provide a potentially useful tool for such a purpose. The point of this study is to create a new approach to test a change in practical experience to assess unintentional learning related to classic psychomotor skills in engineering technology laboratory classes. The methodology used to build up the instrument is portrayed and the empirical data collected to support its validity is presented. Thus, this research aims to find a way to measure the practical skill involve in a psychomotor change in an engineering laboratory class.

1.
Achumba
,
I. E.
,
Azzi
,
D.
,
Dunn
,
V. L.
and
Chukwudebe
,
G. A
,
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
,
6
.
2
,
103
116
(
2013
).
2.
Baharom
,
S.
,
Khoiry
,
M. A.
,
Hamid
,
R.
,
Mutalib
,
A. A.
and
Hamzah
,
N.
,
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
,
10
,
1
10
(
2015
).
4.
Daud
,
M. H.
,
Razali
,
Z. B.
and
Alias
,
M.
Assessing students ’ acquisition of hands-on experience in electronics laboratories which focused on psychomotor domain
”,
2016
).
5.
Radin Salim
,
K.
,
Puteh
,
M.
and
Mohd Daud
,
S.
Levels of practical skills in basic electronic laboratory: Students’ perceptions
” (
IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON
,
2011
), pp.
231
235
.
6.
Razali
,
Z. B.
and
Trevelyan
,
J. P.
Ability in diagnosing equipment faults: contribution of students’ practical intelligence
” (
International Engineering and Technology Education Conference (IETEC
),
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
2011
)
7.
Salim
,
K. R.
,
Puteh
,
M.
and
Daud
,
S. M.
,
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
,
56
,
564
555
(
2012
).
8.
Wang
,
C. Y.
,
Wu
,
H. K.
,
Lee
,
S. W. Y.
,
Hwang
,
F. K.
,
Chang
,
H. Y.
,
Wu
,
Y. T.
,
Chiou
,
G. L.
,
Chen
,
S.
,
Liang
,
J. C.
,
Lin
,
J. W.
,
Lo
,
H. C.
and
Tsai
,
C. C.
A review of research on technology-assisted school science laboratories
” (
Educational Technology and Society
,
2017
), pp.
307
320
.
9.
Olson
,
G. J.
,
Duffy
,
S.A.
and
Mack
,
R. L.
”Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes” (
D.E.
Kieras
&
M.A.
Just
(Eds.),
New methods in reading comprehension research
,
1984
), pp.
253
286
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.