The unique chemical composition in coffee cherry offers a unique quality when it is processed. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristic of local Robusta coffee cherry when submitted to fermentation and roasting process via wet process. Local Robusta coffee cherry were divided to three groups namely Green B, Fermented and Roasted. Commercial samples namely Green N, Kopi Luwak and Green Z were also analysed as a benchmarking which representing the process involved. All the samples were evaluated for their antioxidant activity (AA) using ABTS and DPPH method including TPC analysis. Its organic acid, caffein and chlorogenic acid were also analysed using HPLC equipped with PDA detector. The AA values for both ABTS and DPPH methods showed similar trends and aligned with TPC results where Green N possessed the highest antioxidant value (IC50 160.6 ± 1.6 µg/ml, IC50 2007.5 ± 10.5 µg/ml, ABTS and DPPH respectively). The acetic acid concentration is in the range between 0.03-1.13 (%dry matter) while lactic acid concentration is in the range between 0.01-0.79 (%dry matter). Caffeine content was found at a higher concentration in Roasted (3.78 ± 3.5 mg/g) followed by Kopi Luwak (2.75 ± 0.5 mg/g) and Fermented (2.68 ± 0.8 mg/g) while chlorogenic acid was found at the highest concentration in Green B (0.40 ± 0.2 mg/g). Sample submitted to fermentation prior to roasting process gave impact on acetic acid, lactic acid, caffeine and CGA content. Acetic acid, lactic acid, caffeine and CGA are components that affect the quality of coffee as such offer a special characteristic of local Robusta coffee cherry.

1.
J. A.
Carrillo
and
J.
Benetiz
,
Clin Pharmacokinet
,
39
,
27
153
(
2000
).
2.
J. V.
Higdon
and
B.
Frei
,
Crit Rev Food Sci and Nutr.
.
46
,
2
,
101
123
(
2006
).
4.
S. J.
Zhang
,
De.
Bruyn
,
V.
Pothakos
,
G. F.
Contreras
,
Z.
Cai
,
C.
Moccand
,
S.
Wecksx
and
L.
De Vuyst
,
Microbiology
,
10
,
2621
(
2019
).
5.
H.
Mesfin
and
W. H.
Kang
,
Journal of Food Quality
,
12
,
1
6
(
2019
).
6.
J. M.
Awika
,
L. W.
Rooney
,
X.
Wu
,
R. L.
Prior
and
L.
Cisneros-Zevallos
,
J Agric Food Chem.
,
51, 23
,
6657
6662
(
2003
).
7.
M.
Ozgen
,
R. N.
Reese
,
A. Z.
Tulio
,
J. C
Scheerens
and
A. R. J.
Miller
,
J Agric Food Chem.
,
54
,
4
,
1151
1157
(
2006
).
8.
L. L.
Mensor
,
F. S.
Menezes
,
G. G.
Leitao
,
A. S.
Reis
,
T. C.
Santos
,
C. S.
Coube
and
S. G.
Leitao
,
Phytotherapy Research
,
15
,
2
,
127
130
(
2001
).
9.
N. J.
Miller
and
G. A.
Rice-Evans
,
Biochem Soc Trans.
,
24
,
3
,
790
795
(
1996
).
10.
I.
Fidrianny
,
P. I.
Sari
and
K. R.
Wirasutisna
,
Int J Pharmacognosy Phyto Research
,
7
,
2
,
280
285
(
2015
).
11.
M.
Jeszka-Skowron
,
A.
Sentkowska
,
K.
Pyrzyńska
and
M. P. D.
Pena
,
Eur. Food Res. Technol.
,
242
,
1403
1409
(
2006
).
12.
A.
Yashin
,
Y.
Yashin
,
J. Y.
Wang
and
B.
Nemzer
,
Antioxidants
,
2
,
4
,
230
245
(
2013
).
13.
M. D.
Castillo
,
J. M.
Ames
and
M. H.
Gordon
,
J. Agric. Food Chem.
,
50
,
13
,
3698
3703
(
2002
).
14.
L.
Votovova
,
M.
Voldȓich
,
R.
Ševčȋk
,
H.
Čȋźkova
,
J.
Mlejnecka
,
M.
Stolar
and
T.
Fleiśman
,
Czech J. Food Sci.
,
27
,
S49
S52
(
2009
).
15.
G.
Clarke
,
K. N.
Ting
,
C.
Wiart
and
J.
Fry
,
Antioxidants
,
2
,
1
,
1
10
(
2013
).
16.
F. M.
Borèm
,
L. P.
Figueiredo
,
F. C.
Ribeiro
,
J. H. S.
Taveira
,
G. S.
Giomo
and
T. J. G.
Salva
,
African J. Agric.
,
11
,
8
,
709
717
(
2016
).
17.
C.
Lentner
and
F. E.
Deatherage
,
J. Food Sci.
,
24
,
5
,
483
492
(
1959
).
18.
L.
Axelsson
, “
Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology in Microbiological and functional aspects
” (
New York
:
Marcel Dekker
,
2004
).
19.
A.
Farah
and
J. P.
Lima
,
Beverages
,
5
,
11
,
1
29
(
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.