Evaluation of the performance of two nanofluids (γ-Fe2O3 and xGnP) was investigated in hard turning of AISI 420 stainless steel (48 ±2 HRC) using coated carbide tools (KC5010) under minimum quantity lubrication. The investigation considered the tool life, cutting force and surface roughness responses at medium cutting speed and feed rate (135 m/min, 0.20 mm/rev) and constant depth of cut (0.2 mm). The concertation of nanofluids are 0.4% (1.6 g), 0.8% (3.2 g), and 1.2% (6.4 g) by weight of γ-Fe2O3 and xGnP. The results revealed the overall better performance of γ-Fe2O3 compared to xGnP. The better performance of γ-Fe2O3 was achieved at 0.8% concentration as it leads to the lowest surface roughness (0.18 μm), and cutting force (FX= 195 N) and highest tool life (8.31 min). However, the 0.4% of xGnP lead to the worst performance as it had the cutting force (FX= 285 N) and lowest tool life (3.27 min) while, highest surface roughness (0.26 μm) for both 0.4 γ-Fe2O3 and 0.8 xGnP. It is expected that this study finishings will improve the cutting condition which leads to the achievement of good geometry, enhancement of environmental friendliness, improvement of surface integrity, saving of time and reduction of cost in the manufacturing industries of hardened materials.

1.
P.
Sharma
,
B.S.
Sidhu
, and
J.
Sharma
,
J. of Clea. Prod.
108
,
72
79
(
2015
).
2.
K.
Khanafer
,
A.
Eltaggaz
, and
I.
Deiab
,
Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech.
108
,
1-2
,
475
483
(
2020
).
3.
M.K.
Gupta
and
P.K.
Sood
,
Friction
,
5
,
2
,
155
170
(
2017
).
4.
M.H.
Cetin
,
J. of Clea. Prod.
19
,
17-18
,
2049
2056
(
2011
).
5.
A.
Hamdan
,
A.A.
Sarhan
, and
M.
Hamdi
,
Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech.
58
,
1-4
,
81
91
(
2012
).
6.
M.H.S.
Elmunafi
,
D.
Kurniawan
, and
M.
Noordin
,
Procedia CIRP.
26
,
408
411
, (
2015
).
7.
T.
Singh
,
Int. J. of Autom Mech. Eng.
15
,
4
,
5837
5862
(
2018
).
8.
M.A.
Suhaimi
, “
Evaluation of cutting force and surface roughness in high-speed milling of compacted graphite iron
” (
MATEC Web of Conferences
,
2017
) pp.
100
.
9.
S.
Dilbag
and
P.V.
Rao
,
Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech.
38
,
5-6
,
529
535
(
2008
).
10.
M.
Noordin
,
D.
Kurniawan
, and
S.
Sharif
,
Int. J. of Prec. Tech.
1
,
1
,
75
84
(
2007
).
11.
K.
Venkatesan
,
S.
Devendiran
, and
N.M.
Ghazaly
,
Proc. Manuf.
30
,
90
97
(
2019
).
12.
K.
Ganesan
,
J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. and Eng.
40
,
3
,
17
(
2018
).
13.
V. K.
Pasam
and
P.
Neelam
,
Smart and Sust. Manuf. Syst.
4
,
1
,
18
, (
2020
).
14.
V.
Anandan
,
J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. and Eng.
,
42
,
4
,
15
(
2020
).
15.
S.
Gugulothu
and
V.K.
Pasam
,
Aust. J. of Mech. Eng.
11
(
2020
).
16.
L.
Gong
,
Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech.
108
,
9-10
,
3159
3174
(
2020
).
17.
F. S. A.
Majeed
, “
Effect of paraffin oil with XGnP and Fe2O3 nanoparticles on tribological properties
” (
Materials Today Proceeding
,
2020
).
18.
P.
Jindal
 et al. 
Int. J. of Ref. Met. and Hard Mater.
17
,
1-3
,
163
170
(
1999
).
19.
L.
Shaw
,
Met Cutt Principles.
1
,
5
(
2005
).
20.
A. S.
Varadarajan
,
P. K.
Philip
and
B.
Ramamoorthy
,
Int. J. of Mach. Tools and Manuf.
42
,
2
,
193
200
(
2002
)
21.
R. A.
Laghari
,
J. G.
Li
, and
M.
Mia
,
Metals.
10
,
6
,
21
(
2020
).
22.
A. Kumar
Sharma
,
Measure.
150
,
107078
(
2020
)..
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.