The ubiquity of technology in the last decades has transformed education, accelerated the development of e-learning and has placed a lot of challenges to the higher education institutions in terms of students’ assessment. These potential challenges of e-assessment slowed down the process of its proliferation to some extent but the COVID-19 pandemic forced the introduction of e-assessment in all educational stages, and in most cases institutions had to “switch, almost overnight, to online teaching and virtual education” [1]. This study aims to identify the impact of students’ experience from one of the leading Bulgarian universities – Sofia University (SU) in forced introduction of e-assessment on their views and perspectives about it. The research method is an online survey, conducted at the end of the semester in academic year 2019/2020 and students from all 16 SU faculties were invited to take part. The paper focuses on three main aspects – 1) students experience in e-assessment during pandemic; 2) students’ views on e-assessment; and 3) the impact of their experience in e-assessment on their views. Findings from data analysis reveal that students were mostly summative assessed through course works (artefacts) submissions and tests, and the use of different types of formative assessment was very limited. The technologies utilised for the assessments by academic staff were also very deficient. These results demonstrate that most of the teachers transferred their experience and approaches to students’ assessment from face-to- face to the online environment without adaptation and modification to specifics of the latter. This decreased to a certain extent the trust of students in e-assessment and reinforced their preference to face-to-face assessment. Conclusions impose the need for advanced training of academic staff in the field of e-learning and e-assessment design.

1.
S. J.
Daniel
,
“Education and the COVID-19 pandemic
,” in
Prospects
(
2020
). .
2.
C. A.
Jones
,
Assessment for Learning. Learning and Skills Development Agency
(
Learning and Skills Development Agency
,
London, UK
,
2005
).
3.
JISC
. Effective assessment in a digital age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. (
HEFCE
,
2010
), Available at www.jisc.ac.uk/digiassess.
4.
G.
Crisp
,
Teacher's handbook on e-assessment. A handbook to support teachers in using e-assessment to improve and evidence student learning and outcomes
(
Transforming Assessment
,
Sydney
,
2011
).
5.
D. J.
Walker
,
“Principles of Good Online Assessment Design
” in
REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility, (29th-31st May
2007
).
6.
M.
Appiah
and
F.
Van Tonder
, “
E-Assessment in higher education: A review
”,” in (
IJBMER)
,
9
(
6
), (
2018
), pp.
1454
1460
.
7.
J.
Ridgway
,
S.
McCusker
, and
D.
Pead
, “Literature review of e-assessment,”, Report 10,
Bristol
,
2004
, HAL Id: hal-00190440
8.
A.
Way
,
“The use of e-assessments in the Nigerian higher education system
,” in
Turkish Online J. Distance Educ.
, vol.
13
, no.
1
(
2012
), pp.
140
152
.
9.
J.
Donovan
,
C.
Mader
, and
J.
Shinsky
,
“Online vs. traditional course evaluation formats: Student perceptions
,” in
Journal of Interactive Online Learning
, vol.
6
, no.
3
(
2017
), pp.
158
180
.
10.
L.
Gilbert
,
D.
Whitelock
, and
V.
Gale
, “Synthesis report on assessment and feedback with technology enhancement,”
SRAFTE
,
Southampton, (July
2011
).
11.
M.
Eljinini
and
S.
Alsamarai
,
“The impact of e-assessments system on the success of the implementation process
,” in
International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science.
, vol.
4
, no.
11 (December 2012
), pp.
76
84
, DOI:
12.
N.
Alruwais
,
G.
Wills
, and
M.
Wald
.
“Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment
,” in
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
, Vol.
8
, No.
1
(January
2018
), pp.
34
37
, DOI:
13.
R.
Obeidallah
,
A.
Al Ahmad
,
F.
Farouq
, and
S.
Awad
,
“Students authentication in e-assessment sessions: A theoretical biometric model for smartphone devices
,” in
International Journal of Business Information Systems
,
19
(
4
), (
2015
), pp.
450
464
.
14.
JISC (
2016
).
Technology and tools for online learning. A Guide. Available at
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/technology-and-tools-for-online-learning.
15.
Jisc (
2020
),
The future of assessment: five principles, five targets for 2025
, A Report. Available at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/the-future-of-assessment.
16.
R.
Peytcheva-Forsyth
,
L.
Aleksieva
, and
B.
Yovkova
,
“The impact of technology on cheating and plagiarism in the assessment – The teachers’ and students’ perspectives
,” in
AIP Conference Proceedings,
vol:
2048
, issue:i1 (
2018
), pp.
020037
-
1
- 020037-10, DOI: .
17.
P.
Black
,
C.
Harrison
,
C.
Lee
,
B.
Marshall
, and
D.
Wiliam
,
Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice.
(
Open University Press
,
Maidenhead
,
2003
).
18.
K. J.
Topping
,
“Peer Assessment: Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners
,” in
Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology,
1
(
1
):7 (
2017
), pp.
1
17
19.
S.
Baum
and
M. S.
McPherson
.
“The Human Factor: The Promise & Limits of Online Education
,” in
Dædalus, Fall
2019 issue
.
20.
M.
Fuller
,
P.
Holzweiss
and
S.
Joyner
,
“The importance of peer connections in Distance Education
,” in
International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,
Vol.
12
, No.
2
(
2015
), p.
15
22
21.
H. T.
Hou
,
K. E.
Chang
and
Y. T.
Sung
,
“An Analysis of Peer Assessment Online Discussions within a Course that uses Project-based Learning
,” in
Interactive Learning Environments,
15
:
3
, (
2007
), pp.
237
251
.
22.
K.
Swan
,
“Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction
,” in
Education, Communication & Information,
2
(
1
), (
2002
), pp.
23
49
.
23.
C.
Poyatos-Matas
and
C.
Allan
,
“Providing feedback to online students: A new approach
”, in
Research and Development in Higher Education: Higher education in a changing world,
Annual International HERDSA Conference
, vol.
28
(
2005
), pp.
389
398
.
24.
D.
Laurillard
,
Teaching as a Design Science Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology
, (
Routledge
,
London
,
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.