The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led schools and universities to change their primary methods of instruction from in-classroom learning to distance learning. National and local government authorities have called for children to study from home, and UNICEF has urged school authorities to ensure that there are plans in place for remote learning options. The purpose of this research is to evaluate one current form of technology used for distance learning in higher education, using quantitative descriptive correlation. This research examines the use of the interactive features of Skype to convey environmental knowledge to bachelor and magister students of the Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta, Indonesia. The research took place from 28 March to 30 May 2020, during the COVID-19 outbreak. Research showed that students were motivated to learn remotely because 73% said they preferred to attend the class using Skype and 87% perceived they would benefit from learning through Skype. High vs. low test scores were found to correlate with familiarity vs. lack of familiarity with Skype, with those who believed they would vs. would not score higher because they learned remotely, with those who believed learning remotely did or did not aid them in understanding key concepts, and with those who hoped vs. did not hope to continue with remote learning in the future.

1.
C.
Panagiotakopoulos
, et al.,
J Open Distance Educ Educ Technol
11
, (
2015
).
2.
R.
Roberts
,
J Open, Flex Distance Learn
13
, pp.
91
107
(
2009
).
3.
L.
Gold
and
C.
Maitland
, "
What's the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education
", in:
The Institute for Higher Education Policy
(
Washington DC
,
1999
), p.
11
.
4.
A.
Fluck
,
O. S.
Adebayo
, and
S. M.
Abdulhamid
,
The Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice
16
, pp.
107
125
(
2017
).
5.
H.
Retnawati
,
S.
Hadi
,
A. C.
Nugraha
, et al.,
Probl Educ 21st Century
75
, pp.
612
633
(
2017
).
6.
H.
Uzunboylu
,
N.
Cavus
, and
E.
Ercag
,
Comput Educ
52
, pp.
381
389
(
2009
).
7.
C.
Hodges
,
S.
Moore
,
B.
Lockee
, et al.,
Educause Review
(
2020
).
8.
A.
Samir
,
M.
El-Seoud
,
I. A. T. F.
Taj-Eddin
,
N.
Seddiek
, et al.,
Int J Emerg Technol Learn
9
, pp.
20
26
(
2014
).
9.
R.
Silvakumar
,
J Psychol Educ Res
5
, pp.
5
10
(
2015
).
10.
S. M.
Al-Zoubi
and
M. A. B.
Younes
,
Theory Pract Lang Stud
5
, pp.
2262
(
2015
).
11.
D.
Derks
,
A. H.
Fischer
,
A. E. R.
Bos
,
Comput Human Behav
24
, pp.
766
785
(
2008
).
12.
G.
Newton
and
P.
McCunn
,
Australas J Educ Technol
31
, pp.
252
262
(
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.