This study was to identify students’ cognitive level achievement after participating in the Textile Chemistry lesson conducted in a blended learning environment. This study was carried out with a one-group posttest-only design involving 54 undergraduate students of Apparel Design Study Program Universitas Negeri Jakarta. During the teaching- learning process, the studied group was engaged in teaching-learning activities conducted with various online learning platforms, including LMS Moddle, Youtube, Zoom, and Whatsapp Messenger. At the end of the lesson, the students composed post-experimental reports which were then scored and analysed. The result of this study revealed that in a blended learning environment, 13% students only achieved C3 (applying) with an average score of 71.37, 55.5% students only achieved C4 (analyzing) with an average score of 82.7, and only 31.5% students successfully achieved C5 (synthesizing) with an average score of 88.7.

1.
Kemdikbud
,
Surat Edaran Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Pencegahan Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) Di Perguruan Tinggi.c
(
2020
). [Online]. http://Kemdikbud.Go.Id/. http://kemdikbud.go.id/main/?lang=id
2.
S.
Abdulrasool
and
R.
Mishra
,
Learning and Teaching Mechanical Engineering Courses with Blended Learning Environment - Higher Order Application of Bloom’ s Taxonomy
,
University of Huddersfield
, pp.
84
91
(
2010
).
3.
A.
Cobanoglu
and
B.
Yurdakul
, (
2014
).
Journal of Education and Practice
5
(
22
), pp.
176
197
(
2014
). [Online]. www.iiste.org
4.
A.
Omiola
,
R.
Enuwa
,
O.
Awoyemi
, and
R.
Adebayo
,
British Journal of Science
6
, pp.
38
44
(
2012
).
5.
H.
Singh
,
Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-
43
(
6
), pp.
51
54
(
2003
).
6.
J. C.
Cronje
,
Electronic Journal of E-Learning
18
(
2
), pp.
114
135
(
2020
).
7.
C. L.
Lim
, et al.,
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET)
15
(
03
), p.
110
(
2020
).
8.
D.
Matukhin
and
E.
Zhitkova
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
206
, pp.
183
188
(
2015
).
9.
M.
Eryilmaz
,
Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER)
8
(
4
), pp.
251
256
(
2015
).
10.
M. J.
Kintu
,
C.
Zhu
, and
E.
Kagambe
,
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
14
(
1
), (
2017
).
11.
L.
Hsu
,
American Journal of Educational Research
5
(
1
), pp.
18
24
(
2017
).
12.
Y.
Akatsuka
,
Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics
23
(
1
), pp.
59
84
(
2019
).
13.
Association National Education
. (n.d.).
An Educator’s Guide to the “Four Cs.”
http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
14.
A. O.
Pearl
, et al.,
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
33
(
2
), pp.
166
126
(
2018
).
16.
R.
Baguma
, et al.,
International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology
15
(
2
), pp.
98
116
(
2019
).
17.
E.
Chiapetta
and Koballa,
London: Pearson Education Inc
105
(
2010
).
18.
M.
Makagiansar
and
E.
Al
,
Education for All. Bulletin of the Unesco Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific
23
(
77
), pp.
381
403
(
1989
).
19.
I. M.
Arievitch
,
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2020
, p.
100274
(
2019
).
20.
Suyitno
, et al.,
Cakrawala Pendidikan
38
(
3
), pp.
499
510
(
2019
).
21.
S.
Wade
and
C.
Kidd
,
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
26
(
4
), pp.
1377
1387
(
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.