This article describes a preliminary study on students’ characteristics and their needs in physics learning at SMAN 1 Koto Baru. This study was conducted to evaluate the characteristics of the students and to analyze the need of teacher responses assessment in physics learning activities. The sort of research to be used is research and development. This research uses descriptive statistical methods. Items developed in the form of E-Book based on Project Based Learning (PJBL) models sponsored by the Science Laboratory Kit, Physics content class X. The model of growth uses the Plomp model. Researchers used interview cards, instructor questionnaires and student questionnaires to collect initial data. Initial data collection was carried out at SMAN 1 Koto Baru. Based on the findings of the survey observations, the results of the analysis on students’ characteristics shows the percentage of attitudes at 66.67%, initial ability at 62.50%, learning styles at 70%, learning interest at 58.3%, and the motivation at a percentage of 68.75%. Analysis of the needs reflected in the performance analysis at 82.14%, the standard graduation analysis is based on the analysis of attitudes at 80%. The acquisition of knowledge at 54.16% and the skill at 46.43%. E-Book can encourage students to participate actively in the materials discussed. The Science Laboratory Kit will help teachers understand. Such work will produce true, realistic and efficient products. Therefore, the learning activities becomes meaningful, and can improve students' competence.

1.
N.
Nurkholis
,
Jurnal Kependidikan
1
(
1
), (
2013
).
2.
Gunawan
,
A.
Harjono
, and
H.
Sahidu
,
Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika
5
(
2
), p.
41
(
2015
).
3.
S.
Bahri
and
F.
Bakri
,
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika
4
(
1
), pp.
35
46
(
2018
).
4.
M.
Mulyasa
,
Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013
(
PT Remaja Rosdakarya
,
Bandung
,
2014
).
5.
A
Asrizal
,
A
Amran
,
A.
Ananda
, and
F.
Festiyed
,
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
335
, (
2017
). doi:
6.
J.
Astutik
,
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
812
, (
2017
).
7.
N.
Solomon
and
E. W.
Michael
,
Handbook of Distance Learning for Real-Time and Asynchronous Information Technology Education
(
IGI Global
,
Covent Garden (London
),
2008
).
8.
N.
Nugroho
,
A.
Adiyatno
, and
S.
Suliyanah
,
Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika
7
(
2
), (
2018
).
9.
S.
Sugiyono
,
Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D),
(
Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2011
).
10.
Suryana
,
Metode Penelitian Model Praktis Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif
(
UPI
,
Bandung
,
2010
).
11.
S.
Sugiyono
,
Metode Penelitian Bisnis
(
Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2005
).
12.
S.
Sukmadinata
,
Metode Penelitian Pendidikan
(
Remaja Rosdakarya
,
Bandung
,
2007
).
13.
Kemendikbud
,
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 54 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
(
Kemendikbud
,
Jakarta
,
2013
).
14.
A.
Amran
,
A.
Ananda
, and
S.
Khairani
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1006
(
1
), p.
012031
, (
2018
).
15.
A.
Sudijono
,
Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan
(
Grafindo Persada
,
Jakarta
,
2005
).
16.
S.
Zubaidah
,
Keterampilan abad ke-21: keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran, December 10, 2016: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dengan tema “Isu-isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21”
(
STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang
,
Kalimantan Barat
,
2016
).
17.
A.
Prastowo
,
Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif
(
Diva Press
,
Yogyakarta
,
2015
).
18.
D.
Oktasari
,
D.
Hediansah
,
J.
Jumadi
, and
W.
Warsono
,
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika
6
(
1
), pp.
131
138
(
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.