The implementation of a blended learning approach in a teacher professional development program needs to get more attention. The objective of the present study was to investigate in-service mathematics teachers’ perspectives on the effectiveness of blended learning in the Teacher Professional Development Program. Sixty-four in-service mathematics teachers who completed the program in two large universities in Jakarta Province involved voluntarily in the study. By employing a cross-sectional survey, participants’ responses were collected through a closed and open-ended questionnaire developed by the researcher. The data were analyzed descriptively. As a result, most participants revealed a positive perspective towards blended learning and instructors’ feedback, independence, and discipline in accomplishing online assignments, readiness in technical support, and improvement of interaction. Besides, participants unpacked their points of view related to the implementation of the program. Implications of the study suggest how the findings of the study may be critical for policy, practice, and subsequent study. Finally, several recommendations are offered to improve the program.

1.
R.
Francis
and
S.J.
Shannon
,
Eur J Eng Educ.
,
38
(
4
), pp.
359
69
(
2013
).
2.
M.
Eryilmaz
,
Contemp Issues Educ Res.
,
8
(
4
), pp.
251
6
(
2015
).
3.
U.
Matzat
,
Comput Educ.
,
60
(
1
), pp.
40
51
(
2013
).
4.
P.
Jokinen
and
I.
Mikkonen
,
Nurse Educ Pract.
,
13
(
6
), pp.
524
528
(
2013
).
5.
J.
Poon
,
J. Online Learn Teach.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
271
288
(
2013
).
6.
R.T.
Osguthorpe
and
C.R.
Graham
,
Q Rev distance Educ.
,
4
(
3
), pp.
227
233
(
2003
).
7.
H.
Catalano
,
Procedia - Soc Behav Sci.
,
142
, pp.
762
768
(
2014
).
8.
M.J.
Kintu
,
C.
Zhu
, and
E.
Kagambe
,
Int J Educ Technol High Educ
,
14
(
1
), p.
7
(
2017
)
9.
A.
Dharma
and
D.
Rohendi
, in
5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018), Education and Humanities Research (Atlantis Press, 2019
), pp.
123
126
.
10.
P.
Gerbic
,
Educational Media International
,
48
(
3
), pp.
221
234
(
2011
).
11.
B.
Güzer
and
H.
Caner
,
Procedia - Soc Behav Sci.
,
116
, pp.
4596
4603
(
2014
).
12.
P.
Kharb
and
P.P.
Samanta
,
J Anat Soc India
,
65
(
1
), pp.
43
47
(
2016
).
13.
N.
Moore
and
M.
Gilmartin
,
J Geogr High Educ.
,
34
(
3
), pp.
327
44
(
2010
).
14.
A.
Al-Jarrah
,
M.K.
Thomas
and
M.
Shehab
,
Int J Educ Technol High Educ.
,
15
(
1
), (
2018
).
15.
R.A.
Rasheed
,
A.
Kamsin
and
N.A.
Abdullah
,
Comput Educ.,144
, (
2020
).
16.
N. Zher
Huey
and
R.M.R.
Hussain
,
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
,
9
,
810
814
, (
2010
).
17.
G.
Bombaerts
and
P.J.
Nickel
, in
2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)
(
IEEE
,
2017
), pp.
1089
1092
.
18.
M.
Alizadeh
,
P.
Mehran
,
I.
Koguchi
and
H.
Takemura
,
Int J Educ Technol High Educ.
,
16
(
1
), (
2019
).
19.
Y.C.
Kuo
,
B.R.
Belland
,
K.E.E.
Schroder
and
A.E.
Walker
,
Distance Educ.
,
35
(
3
), pp.
360
81
(
2014
).
20.
H.
Berger
,
B.S.
Eylon
, and
E.
Bagno
,
J Sci Educ Technol.
,
17
(
4
), pp.
399
409
(
2008
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.