Research has been conducted to find out what misconceptions occur to students and to determine the percentage of misconceptions experienced by students on the colligative properties of the solution using a digital-based three-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test. This qualitative descriptive study used data from the analysis of diagnostic tests via google form to high school students of grade XII (N = 34 students) and the results of interviews to trace misconceptions. The results showed that the level of students ’misconceptions is low, but the level of students’ understanding is also low. This is shown in each students’ concept understanding of the colligative properties having misconceptions, as if the misconception (a) composition of the solution is 15.20%, (b) a decrease in vapor pressure is 8.64%, (c) an increase in the boiling point of the solution is 8, 82%, (d) a decrease in the freezing point of the solution by 10.00%, and (e) the osmotic process of the solution by 10.29%. The results of the interviews with students who had misconceptions provide the fact that students experienced difficulties and confusion regarding the colligative properties of the solution. This implies the importance of considering the learning strategy of the teacher about possibilities students’ misconceptions before learning the colligative properties of the solution.

1.
Cardellini
L.
Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult?
Educ Quimica.
2012
;
23
:
305
10
.
2.
Nakhleh
M.
Why Some Students Don‘t Learn Chemistry Chemical Misconceptions
.
J Chem Educ.
1992
;
69
(
3
):
191
6
.
3.
Johnstone
A.
Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom What They Seem
.
J Comput Assist Learn.
1991
;
7
(
2
):
75
83
.
4.
Woldeamanuel
M.
,
Atagana
H.
,
Engida
T.
What makes chemistry difficult?
African J Chem Educ.
2014
;
4
(
2
):
31
42
.
5.
Üce
M.
,
Ceyhan
İ.
Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis
.
J Educ Train Stud.
2019
;
7
(
3
):
202
8
.
6.
Ilyas
A.
,
Saeed
M.
Exploring Teachers’ Understanding about Misconceptions of Secondary Grade Chemistry Students
.
Int J Cross-Disciplinary Subj Educ.
2018
;
9
(
1
):
3323
2238
.
7.
Anggraeni
D.R.
Studi Pemahaman Konsep dan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Tahun Pertama 2013/2014 pada Konsep Sifat Koligatif Larutan Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Two-Tier
.
Malang
:
universitas Negeri Malang
;
2014
.
8.
Luoga
N.E.
,
Ndunguru
P.A.
,
Mokma
S.L.
High School Student’ Misconceptions About Colligative Properties in Chemistry
.
Tanzania J Nat Appl Sci.
2013
;
4
(
1
):
575
81
.
9.
Nahum
T.L.
,
Hofstein
A.
,
Mamlok-Naaman
R.
,
Bar-Dov
Z.
Can Final Examination Amplify Students’ Misconceptions in Chemistry
.
Chem Educ Res Pract.
2004
;
5
(
3
):
301
25
.
10.
Wardhani
N.K.
, Prayitno,
Fajaroh
F.
Studi Pemahaman Konsep dan Miskonsepsi Calon Guru Kimia pada Topik Struktur Atom Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Two-Tier
.
J Pembelajaran Kim.
2016
;
1
(
2
):
38
41
.
11.
Amry
U.W.
,
Rahayu
S.
, Yahmin.
Analisis Miskonsepsi Asam Basa pada Pembelajaran Konvensional dan Dual Situated Learning Model(DSLM
).
J Pendidik Teor Penelitian, Pengemb.
2017
;
2
(
3
):
385
91
.
12.
Pinarbasi
T.
,
Sozbilir
M.
,
Canpolat
N.
Prospective Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions about Colligative Properties: Boiling Point Elevationand Freezing Point Depression
.
Chem Educ Res Pract.
2009
;
10
:
273
80
.
13.
Effendy.
Molekul
, Struktur,
dan
Sifat-Sifatnya
.
Malang
:
Indonesian Academis Publishing
;
2017
.
14.
Mawardi
D.
Identifikasi Pemahaman Konseptual dan Pemahaman Algoritmik Siswa Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 7 Malang pada Materi Sifat Koligatif Larutan Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010
.
Malang
:
Universitas Negeri Malang
;
2010
.
15.
Anugerah
S.H.
,
Effendy
,
Suharti
.
Analisis Kesalahan KonsepSifat Koligatif Larutan pada Mahasiswa Kimia Universitas Negeri Malang dan Eliminasinya Menggunakan Media Visual Statik
.
J Ilmu Pendidik.
2015
;
21
(
2
):
178
84
.
16.
Gurel
D.K.
A Riview and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’s Misconceptions in Science
.
Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ.
2015
;
11
(
5
):
989
1008
.
17.
Kamilah
D.S.
,
Suwarna
I.P.
Pengembangan Three-Tier Digital untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Konsep Fluida Statis
.
edusains.
2016
;
8
(
2
):
212
20
.
18.
Auliya
A.
,
Hanum
L.
,
Khaldun
I.
Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Siswa pada Materi Sifat Koligatif Larutan dengan Menggunakan Three-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic test di Kelas XII IPA 2 SMA Negeri 5 Banda Aceh
.
J Ilm Mhs Pendidik Kim (JIMPK)-.
2017
;
2
(
1
):
55
64
.
19.
Utami
P.P.
Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Pasuruan pada Materi Larutan Penyangga dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda Dua Tingkat
.
Malang
:
Universitas Negeri Malang
;
2017
.
20.
Puspitasari
I.A.
Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMK Brantas Karangkates Pada Materi Stoikiometri Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Three-Tier
.
Malang
:
Universitas Negeri Malang
;
2018
.
21.
Tümay
H.
Reconsidering learning difficulties and misconceptions in chemistry: emergence in chemistry and its implications for chemical education
.
Chem Educ Res Pract.
2016
;
17
(
2
):
229
45
.
22.
Tümay
H.
Emergence, Learning Difficulties, and Misconceptions in Chemistry Undergraduate Students’ Conceptualizations of Acid Strength
.
Sci Educ.
2016
;
25
(
1
):
21
46
.
23.
Kurniawan
M.
,
Rahayu
S.
,
Fajaroh
F.
,
Almuntasheri
S.
Effectiveness of Dual Situated Learning Model in Improving High School Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry Equilibrium and Preventing Their Misconceptions
.
J Sci Learn.
2020
;
3
(
2
):
99
105
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.