The aims of this study was to develop a valid and reliable science process skills and higher-order thinking skills- oriented test on Colligative Properties of Solutions. The study applied research and development design which was carried out in five stages, there are literature review, item pool, expert judgment, pilot study, and finalization of instrument. Developmental testing involved 75 students of public and private senior high school in Malang and Pasuruan. The final product of instrument consisted of 15 valid items of science process skills test and 13 valid items of higher-order thinking skills on Colligative Properties of Solutions. Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient on science process skills of 0,716 and higher-order thinking skills of 0,704. This indicate that the instrument produced by this research and development can be used to assess students’ science process skills and higher-order thinking skills on Colligative Properties of Solutions.

Topics
General procedures and instrumentation, Students, Educational institutions, Educational assessment, Review
1.
Kemendikbud
.
Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2016 tentang standar kompetensi lulusan pendidikan dasar dan menengah
.
Permendikbud
;
2016
.
Google Scholar
 
2.
Ergül
 
R
,
Şimşekli
 
Y
,
Çaliş
 
S
,
Özdilek
 
Z
,
Güşmenşelebî
 
S
,
Şanli
 
M.
 
The effect of inquiry-based science teaching on elementary school students’ science process skills and science attitudes
.
Bulg J Sci Educ Policy.
 
2011
;
5
(
1
):
48
–
64
.
Google Scholar
 
3.
Chiappetta
 
EL
,
Koballa
 
TR
.
Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools
. 8th Ed.
Upper Saddle River, NJ
:
Merrill Prentice Hall
;
2014
.
Google Scholar
 
4.
Lemons
 
PP
,
Lemons
 
JD
.
Questions for assessing higher-order cognitive skills: it’s not just Bloom’s
.
CBE-Life Sci Educ.
 
2013
;
12
(
1
):
47
–
58
.
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0024
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
5.
Moore
 
B
,
Stanley
 
T.
 
Critical thinking and formative assessments: increasing the rigor in your classroom
.
Larchmont, NY
:
Eye on Education
;
2010
.
Google Scholar
 
6.
Fisher
 
A.
 
Critical Thinking: An Introduction
.
Britain
:
Cambridge University Press
;
2001
.
Google Scholar
 
7.
Anderson
 
LW
,
Krathwohl
 
DR
.
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
, Complete Ed.
New York
:
Longman
;
2001
.
Google Scholar
 
8.
Chandrasegaran
 
AL
,
Treagust
 
DF
,
Mocerino
 
M.
 
The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation
.
Chem Res Pr.
 
2007
;
8
(
3
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
Damanhuri
 
MIM
,
Treagust
 
DF
,
Won
 
M
,
Chandrasegaran
 
AL
.
High school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts: An ongoing challenge for teachers
.
Int J Environ Sci Educ
 
2016
;
11
(
1
):
9
–
27
.
Google Scholar
 
10.
Habiddin
 
H
,
Page
 
EM
.
Development and validation of a four-tier diagnostic instrument for chemical kinetics (FTDICK
).
Indones J Chem.
 
2019
;
19
(
3
):
720
–
736
.
https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Muntholib,
Rahayu
 
S
,
Ibnu
 
S
,
Fajaroh
 
F
,
Kusairi
 
S
,
Kuswandi
 
B.
 
Chemical literacy: performance of first year chemistry students on chemical kinetics
.
Indones J Chem.
 
2019
;
20
(
2
).
https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.27159
Google Scholar
 
12.
Wattanakasiwich
 
P
,
Taleab
 
P
,
Sharma
 
MD
,
Johnston
 
ID
.
Development and implementation of a conceptual survey in thermodynamics
.
Int J Innov Sci Math Educ.
 
2013
;
21
(
1
):
29
–
53
.
Google Scholar
 
13.
Nugraha
 
VD
, Muntholib,
Joharmawan
 
R
,
Parlan
,
Yahmin
,
Su’aidy
 
M.
 
The development of acid-base chemistry test oriented to higher order thinking skills for 11th grade students
.
AIP Conference Proceedings
;
2020
.
Google Scholar
 
14.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA
.
Modul penyusunan soal keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi mata pelajaran kimia
.
Kemendikbud
;
2017
.
15.
Arikunto
 
S.
 
Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik Edisi Revisi
.
Jakarta
:
PT Rineka Cipta
;
2013
.
Google Scholar
 
16.
Suherman
,
Sukjaya
.
Petunjuk Evaluasi untuk Melaksanakan Evaluasi Pendidikan Matematika
,
Bandung
:
Wijayakusuma
;
1990
.
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2021 Author(s).
2021
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.