In accordance with characteristics of chemistry, inquiry learning can be applied for chemistry learning in any level of education. There are various models of inquiry for chemistry learning, especially guided inquiry. One of the guided inquiry-based chemistry learning strategy innovations is the OE3R (Orientation-Exploration-Explanation- Elaboration- Reflection) Strategy, for learning unsaturated hydrocarbon topic of undergraduate students. The aim of this research was to determine the effectiveness of the model in undergraduate student’s scientific argumentation skill. This research used a pre-test and post-test control group design. Amount 26 persons as Experimental Group using OE3R Strategy and 18 persons as Control Group using Expository Strategy. This study was using scientific argumentation test. To avoid subjectivity in the assessment used interrater reliability which is indicated by the value of the kappa coefficient (Cohen-kappa). The data were analyzed statistically with t-test and N-gain score. The quality of scientific argumentation was analyzed by SASC (the Structure of Argumentation and Scientific Credibility) Rubric. The result of this research show experiment class student’s scientific argumentation skill score performed were higher (57.54) than control class (46.28) and there is an increase of scientific argumentation skill score in OE3R Strategy (0.35) include in medium category and 0.16 include low category in Expository Strategy. The highest quality of scientific argumentation (Proficient to Advanced) for the OE3R Strategy (28.5%) was higher than the Expository Strategy (16.2%). The results indicate that the OE3R Strategy as inquiry- based learning is effective for chemistry learning in undergraduate student’s scientific argumentation skill for unsaturated hydrocarbon topic.

1.
Johnstone
AH
.
Seldom What They Seem
.
J Comput Assist Learn.
1991
;
7
75
83
.
2.
Enger
,
S.K.
&
Yager
RE
.
Assesing Student Understanding in Science A Standard-Based K-12 Handbook
.
California Corwin A SAGE Company
;
2009
.
3.
Szalay
L.
,
Toth
Z.
An Inquiry-Based Approach of Traditional “Step-by-Step
Experiments. Chem Educ Res Pract.
2016
;
17
(
4
)
923
61
.
4.
Minner
DD
,
Levy
AJ
,
Century
J.
Inquiry-Based Science Instruction-What Is It and Does It Matter?
Results From A Research Synthesis Years 1984 To 2002. J Res Sci Teach.
2010
;
47
(
4
)
474
96
.
5.
National Research Council
. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards 
AGuide for Teaching and Learning/Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education
.
Washington DC
National Academy Press
;
2000
.
6.
Haury
DL
.
Teaching Science Through Inquiry
.
ERIC Clear House Sci Math Environ Educ.
2015
;
71
2
.
7.
Mattox
AC
,
Reisner
BA
.
Are Added to Water? An Introduction to the Model - Observe - Reflect - Explain ( MORE) Thinking Frame
.
J Chem Educ.
2006
;
83
(
4
)
622
4
.
8.
Hanson
DM
,
Bunce
D.
,
Creegan
F.
,
Moog
R.
,
Padwa
L.
,
Spencer
J.
, et al. 
Instructor ’ s Guide to Guided-Inquiry Learning by With Contributions from other POGIL project personnel : Instructor ’ s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning
.
Lacey Avenue Pacific Creast
;
2006
.
9.
Wilder
M.
,
Shuttleworth
P.
,
Wilder
M.
,
Shuttleworth
P.
Science Activities Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas
.
2010
;(October 2014)
37
41
.
10.
Manoli
C.
,
Pedaste
M.
,
Maeots
M.
,
Siiman
L.
, De T.,
Riesen SAN
Van
, et al. 
Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning : Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle
.
Educ Res Rev [Internet].
2015
;
14
47
61
. Available from
11.
Wenning
CJ
.
The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching.
2012
; 6(January).
12.
Sutrisno
.
OE3R (Orientasi- Eksplorasi-Eksplanasi-Elaborasi-Refleksi) Sebuah Inovasi Strategi Pembelajaran Sains-Kimia Berbasis Inkuiri
.
Pros Semin Nas Kim dan Pembelajarannya.
2018
;(November)
48
60
.
13.
Robinson
SP
,
Ken
Kay
.
Preparing 21st Century Students for a Global Society Great Public Schools for Every Student
.
2010
; Available from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdfhttps://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf
14.
Cetin
PS
.
Explicit Argumentation Instruction to Facilitate Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills
.
Res Sci Technol Educ.
2014
;
32
(
1
)
1
20
.
15.
Hanri
C.
,
Arshad
MY
,
Surif
J.
Scientific Argumentation Practice in Teaching Science Scientific Argumentation Practice in Teaching Science.
2019
;(January).
16.
Aydeniz
M.
,
Ozdilek
Z.
Assessing Pre- Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Argumentation : What Do They Know About Argumentation After Four Years of College Science?
Sci Educ Int.
2015
;
26
(
2
)
217
39
.
17.
Sutrisno
,
Nanda
GAM
,
Widarti
HR
.
The Effectiveness of Inquiry Based Learning with OE3R Strategy for Conceptual Understanding of Molecular Shape of High School Students
’.
AIP Conf Proceeding
2215
.
2020
;
020025
(April).
18.
Septyastuti
HL
,
Sulistina
O.
,
Sigit
D.
Pengaruh Pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga Model POGIL dan ADI Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik SMA
.
J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kim.
2018
;
3
(
1
)
1
5
.
19.
Anindita
P.
,
Putri
W.
,
Rahayu
S.
,
Fajaroh
F.
Efektivitas Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah pada Materi Laju Reaksi
.
J Pendidik Teor Penelitian, dan Pengemb.
2020
;
5
57
64
.
20.
Noviyani
M.
,
Kusairi
S.
,
Amin
M.
Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen
.
J Pendidik Teor Penelitian, dan Pengemb.
2017
;
2
974
8
.
21.
Sadeh
I.
,
Zion
M.
Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students Prefer
:
Open or Guided ?
2012
;
831
48
.
22.
Mamlok-naaman
R.
Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory : Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory : Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments
.
2010
; (April).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.