This research and development (R&D) aimed to 1) create worksheet assisted inquiry learning video, 2) describe the specifications of the product, and 3) confirm the feasibility of the product. The intended feasible product will be fruitful either as online and face-to-face scientific learning and overcome its obstacles caused by limited resources in scientific learning. The scientific approach involves the main phases of observing, questioning, data collecting, data associating, and communicating. Basic inductive reasoning could naturally grow. If it has not developed well along cognitive development stages, the inductive reasoning tends to diminish as disruptive information continues to bombard human life in the online era. This intended product will empower the development of inductive inquiry learning to boost scientific skills and bring to have a strong understanding of basic science topics such periodic table of elements. The scientific learning approach would be conducive for developing inquiry learning which needs guidance when the students have not adequately had scientific skills. The limitation of learning video in empowering authentic data such as facilitating the last communicating learning phase at the scientific steps will be overcome by well worksheet design. R&D adapted Luther’s development model which involves concept, design, material collecting, assembly, testing, and distribution stages have realized the product. The adequate validity of the product given by learning and media experts and secondary school chemistry teacher and alpha and beta testing to the product has supported to the feasibility of the created product to be implemented as scientific learning either via online, face-to-face, or blended learning. The similar product with this model can be developed further on other learning topics with some adjustment considering the topic characteristics. The learning video model which is also a learning medium is very helpful in inquiry learning in social distance limitations such the Covid-19 pandemic.

1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science
.
Benchmarks for Science Literacy: Project 2061
.
Oxford
:
Oxford University Press
;
1993
.
2.
Sadeh
I.
,
Zion
M.
Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students Prefer: Open or Guided?
Res Sci Educ.
2012
;
42
(
5
):
831
48
.
3.
Sudria
IBN
,
Redhana
IW
,
Kirna
IM
,
Aini
D.
Effect of Ko1b’s Learning Styles under Inductive Guided-Inquiry Learning on Learning Outcomes
.
Int J Instr.
2018
;
11
(
1
):
89
102
.
4.
OECD. PISA 2018 Result Combined Executive Summaries Volume I, II, III. [Internet]. 2019. cited 2020 Apr 8]. Available from: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.
5.
Kirna
IM
,
Sudria
IBN
,
Sudiana
K.
Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Bersuplemen Video dan Animasi Mendukung untuk Mendukung Pendekatan saintifik pada Pembelajaran Kimia
.
Senadimas.
2016
;
1
:
94
103
.
6.
Yi1
dirim
N.
,
Kurt
S.
,
Ayas
A.
The Effect Of The Worksheets On Students’ Achievement In Chemica1 Equi1ibrium Deve1oping Students
Water Awareness and Water Literacy View project Chemistry education in Turkey View project. TUSED
;
2011
;
8
:
44
58
.
7.
Sari
YS
,
Selisne
M.
,
Ramli
R.
Role of students worksheet in STEM approach to achieve competence of physics learning
.
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
2019
;
1185
:
012096
8.
Dick
W.
,
Carey
L.
The Systematic Design of Instruction
.
London
:
Scott and Foresman Company
;
1985
.
9.
Johnstone
AH
.
Why is science difficu1t to Learn ?
Things are se1dom what they seem. J Comput Assist Learn.
1991
;
7
:
75
83
.
10.
Oloruntegbe
KO
,
Alake
EM
.
Chemistry for today and the future: Sustainability through virile problem-based chemistry curriculum
.
Aust J Basic Appl Sci.
2010
;
1
(
4
):
800
7
.
11.
Redhana
IW
,
Sudria
IBN
,
Suardana
IN
,
Suja
IW
,
Handayani
NKN
.
Identification of chemistry teaching problems of a prospective teacher: A case study on chemistry teaching
.
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
2018
;
1040
:
012022
.
12.
Luther
AC
.
Authoring Interactive Multimedia
.
Boston
:
AP Profesional
;
1994
..
13.
Sangsawang
T.
Instructional Design Framework for Educational Media
.
Procedia - Soc Behav Sci.
2015
;
176
:
65
80
.
14.
Yapici
iO
,
Akbayin
H.
The effect of Blended Learning Model on High School Students’ Biology Achievement and on Their Attitudes towards the Internet
.
TOJET.
2012
;
11
:
228
237
.
15.
Suh
H.
Collaborative Learning Models and Support Technologies in the Future Classroom
.
IJEMT.
2011
;
5
(
1
):
50
61
.
16.
Mayer
RE
,
Moreno
R.
Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning
.
Educ Psychol Rev.
2002
;
14
:
87
99
.
17.
Redhana
IW
,
Sudria
IB
,
Suardana
IN
,
Suja
IW
,
Putriani
VD
.
Students’ menta1 mode1s in acid-base topic
.
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
2020
;
1521
042092
.
18.
Felder
RM
.
Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education
.
Engr. Education.
1998
;
78
(
7
):
674
681
.
19.
Sudria
IBN
,
Redhana
IW
,
Suja
IW
,
Suardana
IN
.
Self-assessment of chemistry laboratory basic skills using performance scoring rubrics at the chemistry teacher training
.
IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.
2020
;
959
:
012005
.
20.
Brame
CJ
,
Perez
KE
.
Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content
.
CBE-Life Sciences Education.
2016
;
1
6
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.