The current learning process of science requires students not only to have cognitive abilities but also to be skilled in the learning process. The development of students' science process skills can be measured through several indicators, including: making observations, interpreting observations, classifying, planning experiments, and communicate using tools, predicting and applying concepts. The measuring indicators are related to the Project-Based Learning model, which trains students to do their work through the process of learning stages. This study aims to determine the effect of applying Project Based Learning models on students' science process skills. This research was a pre-experimental study using one group pretest-posttest design. The population of this study were students of MAN 5 Aceh Besar and obtained 40 students of the study sample using a purposive sampling technique. Data is collected from the results of measurement using the science process skills assessment instrument conducted by teachers to students. The instrument includes indicators of science process skills that want to measure before and after learning using the Project-Based Learning model. The data is then analyzed using the t-test formula and is obtained the result of tcount> ttable is 4.29> 1.73, which means Ha is accepted. Based on these results it can be concluded that the application of the Project-Based Learning model is effectively applied to improve the ability of students' science processes at MAN 5 Aceh Besar on Static Fluid topic.

1.
H.
Pratama
and
I.
Prastyaningrum
,
Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA)
6
(
2
), pp.
44
50
(
2016
).
2.
R.
Erina
and
H.
Kuswanto
,
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA
1
(
2
), pp.
202
211
, (
2015
).
3.
M.
Hodosyova
,
J.
Útla
,
M.
Vanyová
,
P.
Vnuková
, and
V.
Lapitková
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
186
, pp.
982
989
(
2015
).
4.
K. E.
Colley
,
Science activities
,
43
(
1
), pp.
26
33
, (
2006
).
5.
S. D. F.
Lindawati
and
A.
Maftukhin
,
Jurnal Radiasi
3
(
1
), pp.
42
45
(
2013
).
6.
R.
Rahmini
,
M.
Muris
, and
B. D.
Amin
,
Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika
11
(
2
), pp.
161
168
(
2015
).
7.
C.Z.
Umara
, dkk.
Jurnal Biotik
4
(
2
), ISSN: (
2016
).
8.
L.
Mutakinati
,
I.
Anwari
, and
Y.
Kumano
,
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
7
(
1
), pp.
54
65
(
2018
).
9.
W.
Sanjaya
.
Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan
, (Kencana, Jakarta,
2010
).
10.
B.
Cavas
,
T.
Kesercioglu
,
J.
Holbrook
,
M.
Rannikmae
,
E.
Ozdogru
, and
F.
Gokler
,
Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics integrating robotics in school curriculum
, pp.
40
50
, (
2012
).
11.
Y.
Abidin
,
Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013
, (
PT. Revika Aditama
,
Bandung
,
2014
).
12.
Trianto
.
Model Pembelajaran Terpadu
, (
Bumi Aksara
,
Jakarta
,
2010
).
13.
S.
Arikunto
,
Prosedur Penelitian
, (
Rineka Cipta
,
Jakarta
,
2013
).
14.
A.
Sudijono
.
Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan
, (PT.Raja Grafinda Persada, Jakarta,
2008
).
15.
R. R.
Hake
,
Physics education research conference
8
(
1
), pp.
1
14
, (
2002
).
16.
A.
Munawaroh
and
W.
Christijanti
,
Journal of Biology Education
2
(
1
), (
2013
).
17.
E.
Mulyadi
,
Jurnal pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan
22
(
4
), pp.
385
395
(
2015
).
18.
T. P.
Lestari
,
S.
Sarwi
, and
S. S.
Sumarti
,
Journal of primary education
7
(
1
), pp.
18
24
(
2018
).
19.
S.
Bell
,
The clearing house
83
(
2
), pp.
39
43
, (
2010
).
D.
Filippatou
and
S.
Kaldi
,
International journal of special education
25
(
1
), pp.
17
-
26
, (
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.