This research aims to develop multiple-choice physics items in measuring the ability of talent intellection of class XI high school students on dynamic fluid material. This research uses the Research and Development (R&D) method. The development model used in this study refers to the model proposed by Djemari Mardapi in stages: (1) compiling test specifications; (2) writing test questions; (3) examine test questions; (4) conducting test trials; (5) analyzing tests; (6) correcting test; (7) assembling the test; (8) carrying out the test; and (9) interpreting test results. The items to be generated are in the form of an essay that can be accessed via smartphones or laptops connected to the internet network. The feasibility test of an essay physics test item on dynamic fluid material to measure the ability of high school student intellection thinking ability through a validity test questionnaire to expert judges by providing a Likert scale and analyzing using the Aiken formula. Validation results from 17 items test questions show validity ≥ 0.87, then the items valid and can be tested to students.

Topics
Students, Educational institutions, Educational assessment
1.
E. F.
 
Redish
,
Am. J. Phys.
 
62
, pp.
796
–
802
(
1994
).
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17461
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
A. T.
 
Collette
 and
E. L.
 
Hiappetta
,
Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools
 3 ed. (
Merrill
,
New York
,
1994
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
M. K.
 
Azmi
,
S.
 
Rahayu
, and
H.
 
Hikmawati
,
J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol.
 
2
(
2
), pp.
86
–
94
(
2016
).
https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i2.294
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
A.
 
Neizhela
,
UPEJ (Unnes Phys. Educ. Journal)
 
4
(
1
), (
2015
).
Google Scholar
 
5.
A.
 
Bencsik
,
T.
 
Juhász
, and
G.
 
Horváth-Csikós
,
J. Compet.
 
6
, pp.
90
–
106
(
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
V.
 
Bansal
 and
A.
 
Khan
,
Int. J. Learn. Dev.
 
8
(
1
), p.
24
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
M. S. Mat
 
Saleh
,
N. N.
 
Mahbob
, and
N. S.
 
Baharudin
,
Int. J. Real Estate Stud.
 
11
(
2
), (
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
8.
S.
 
Ghaidhani
,
L.
 
Arora
, and
K. B.
 
Sharma
,
Int. J. Manag. Technol. Eng.
 
9
(
1
), (
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
R.
 
Biswas-Diener
,
T. B.
 
Kashdan
, and
G.
 
Minhas
,
J. Posit. Psychol.
 
6
(
2
), (
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.545429
Google Scholar
 
10.
H. Y.
 
Suhendi
,
M. A.
 
Ramadhani
, and
F. S.
 
Irwansyah
,
Int. J. Eng. Technol.
 
3
(
21
), p.
322
(
2013
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
N.
 
Jackson
 and
S. M.
 
Jackson
,
Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo.
, p.
4
(
2003
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
A. D.
 
Carson
,
K.
 
Evans
,
E.
 
Gitin
, and
J.
 
Eads
,
J. Career Assesment
 
1
(
15
), p.
4
(
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
T.
 
Rath
,
StrengthsFinder 2.0
(
Gallup Press
,
Washington DC
,
2007
), p.
5
.
Google Scholar
 
14.
A. R.
 
Royani
,
Talents Mapping
(
Tosca
,
Depok
,
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
15.
I. H
,
Indian J. Res.
 
4
(
5
), (
2015
).
16.
S.
 
Syarifuddin
,
J. Prima Edukasia
 
6
(
1
), (
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
E.
 
Hulme
, “
An Introduction to the Intellection® CliftonStrengths Theme
,” Gallup, (
2010
). [Online]. Available at: https://www.strengthsmining.com/gallup-strengthsfinder/strategic-thinking/intellection [Accessed April 13,
2020
].
Google Scholar
 
18.
G.
 
Norman
,
Adv Heal. Sci Educ Theory Pr.
 
15
(
5
), (
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
19.
L. R.
 
Aiken
,
Educ. Psychol. Meas.
 
40
, pp.
955
–
990
(
1980
).
https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2020 Author(s).
2020
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.