Field X is an offshore field that is included in the deep-water area managed by an oil and gas company in Indonesia. From a number of tests conducted it was found that are presence of sand problems in this field especially in well G1 so that several studies were conducted. From the results of the study, it is determined that the use of Frac pack is one of the most appropriate ways, besides controlling sand problems, it also increases gas production on field X. The Frac pack method is a well stimulation by combining gravel pack to control the sand problems with hydraulic fracturing which is designed to have high conductivity to increase productivity over the well. In this paper, a calculation model is developed to find out the optimum fracture half length, fracture width and also the pumping schedule of the Frac pack with sensitivity of proppant concentration. Then the results will be compared with existing commercial software. The challenge faced in frac pack modeling for well G1 is large permeability so that the possibility of leakage occurring is greater and then handled by increasing the injection rate. Based on the calculations and analyzes that have been done, for the well G1 on field X it will be optimum to operate if frac pack is installed with the type of brady sand 20/40 proppant and dynafrac HT 30 as fracturing fluid, so that half fracture length, Xf 76.8 ft is obtained with fracture width, wf 0.4355 ft and 5 times fold of increase in the production. From this study it can be concluded that the calculation model made can be accepted and used commercially.

1.
Economides
,
M.J..
 et al. 
1993
. Petroleum Production Systems.
New Jersey
:
Prentice-Hall PTR
.
2.
Bellarby
,
J.
2009
. Well Completion Design.
United Kingdom
:
Elsevier
3.
Chaudhry
,
A. U.
2003
.
Gas Well Testing Handbook
.
Texas
:
Elsevier
4.
Smith
,
M.B.
 et al.,
1987
.
Tip Screenout Fracturing: A Technique for Soft, Unstable Formation
.
SPE Production Engineering
.
5.
Hainey
,
B.W.
and
Tronscoso
,
J.C.
,
1992
. Frac-Pack: An Innovative Stimulation and Sand Control Technique.
Paper SPE 23777 presented at SPE Symposium on Formation Damage Control
,
Lafayette, Lousiana
.
6.
Weirich
,
J.
 et al.,
2013
.
Frac Packing: Best Practices and Lessons Learned from More Than 600 Operations
.
Paper SPE 147419 PA presented at SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference
,
Texas, USA
.
7.
Patil
,
Bushan.
 et al.,
2014
.
FracPack: Reviving and Maximizing Production Potential in Cambay Offshore Field
.
Paper OTC 25052 MS presented at the Offshore Technology Conference Asia
,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
.
8.
Tang
,
Y.
,
Ranjith
.
P.G.
,
Perera
,
M.S.A.
,
2017
.
Major Factors Influencing Proppant Behavior and Proppant Associated Damage Mechanisms during Hydraulic Fracturing.
9.
Saucier
,
R. J.
1974
.
Considerations in Gravel Pack Design
.
SPE 4030 PA
10.
Neal
,
M. R.
1983
.
Gravel Pack Evaluation
.
SPE 11232 PA
11.
Dontsov
,
E.V.
and
Peirce
,
A.P.
2015
. Proppant Transport in Hydraulic Fracturing: Crack Tip Screen-Out in KGD and P3D Models.
Elsevier
12.
Zhu
,
H.
,
Joseph
,
K.
,
Chok
,
P.
2013
.
Application of Sand Control Modeling Software in a Deepwater Multizone Frac Pack: A Case Study
.
Paper SPE 166273 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
Lousiana, USA
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.