The goal of science education around the world is achieving a scientific literate society and one of important components in developing scientific literacy is understanding the nature of science (NOS). This study aims to describe a profile of junior high school students’ views of NOS. The research was descriptive in nature using survey for data collection. The subjects were 840 junior high school students selected from nine districts in East Java province, Indonesia. The instrument of NOS developed was a questionnaire consisted of 24 items with a Likert scale (alpha Cronbach = 0.802). The six aspects of NOS addressed in the instrument were observation and inference, tentativeness, scientific theory & laws, social & cultural embeddedness, imagination & creativity, and scientific methods. The results of the study showed that in general the junior high school students’ views of all NOS aspects were lacking. In detail, from the six aspects of NOS: the percentage of students who held Well Informed Views, Informed Views, Less Informed Views, Uninformed Views and Uncodeable/Doubt of NOS were 8%, 17%, 10%, 2%, and 63%, respectively. Students understood well in the aspect of tentativeness while they understood least in the aspect of scientific theory and laws. Majority of students, however, doubted in understanding of NOS. The study has implication that knowledge about the NOS should be taught in junior high school explicitly. Moreover, the textbooks they used should also include NOS explicitly so that students will have well informed views of NOS.

1.
F.
Deng
,
D.T.
Chen
,
C.C
Tsai
and
C.S.
Chai
,
Science Education
95
,
961
999
(
2011
).
2.
A.E.F.
Khalick
, F and
N.G.
Lederman
,
International Journal of Science Education
22
,
665
701
(
2000a
).
3.
R.
Driver
,
J.
Leach
,
A.
Miller
, and
P.
Scott
,
Young people images of science
(
Open University Press
,
Pennsylvania
,
1966
).
4.
N.G.
Lederman
,
J. Res. Sci. Tech
29
,
331
359
(
1992
).
5.
N.G.
Lederman
,
A.E.F.
Khalick
,
Bell
,
L.
Randy
,
Schwartz
and
S.J.
Renee
,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
39
,
497
52
(
2002
).
6.
R.
Blanco
and
M.
Niaz
,
Instructional Science
25
,
203
231
(
1997
).
7.
M.R.
McComas
,
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
1
,
141
155
(
2003
).
8.
S.
Irez
,
Science Education
90
,
1113
1143
(
2006
).
9.
C.
Tsai
,
Teaching and Teacher Education
22
,
363
375
(
2006
).
10.
L.L.
Liang
,
S.
Chen
,
X.
Chen
,
O.N.
Kaya
,
A.D.
Adams
,
M.M.
Macklin
, and
J.
Ebenezer
,
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching
9
(
1
).
11.
M.
Karakas
,
Journal of Science and Education Policy
2
,
233
249
(
2008
).
12.
M.K.
Shim
,
B.J.
Young
and
J.
Paolucci
,
The Electronic Journal of Science Education
1
,
1
18
(
2010
).
13.
A.E.F.
Khalick
,
N.G.
Lederman
,
Bell
and
L.
Randy
,
Science Education
82
,
417
436
(
1998
).
14.
H.
Turgut
,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
39
,
1
9
(
2011
).
15.
M.
Syukron
, “
Analisis hakikat sains (the nature of scince) dalam buku ajar kimia SMA berbasis KTSP kelas X
” Undergraduate Thesis,
Universitas Negeri
Malang
,
2012
.
16.
E.
Handoko
, “
Analisis Hakikat Sains (The Nature Of Science) dalam Buku Teks Pelajaran Kimia SMA Kelas XI
”, Undergraduate Thesis,
Universitas Negeri
Malang
,
2012
.
17.
K.
Buaraphan
,
Educational Research and Review
4
,
561
581
(
2009
)
18.
Koksal
,
S.
Mustafa
, and
J.
Cakiroglu
,
Science Education International
21
,
197
211
(
2010
).
19.
G.
Cakmakci
,
Australian Journal of Teacher Education
2
,
114
135
(
2012
).
20.
N.
Dogan
and
A.E.
Khalick
,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
45
,
1083
1112
(
2008
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.