Construction industry often adjudged as engine of growth of a nation’s economy. However, numerous stakes can be affected from the commencement to the completion of a construction project. Not addressing the expectations and concerns of stakeholders involved, has resulted in adverse project performance. The aim of the study is to assess construction project performance with the help of questionnaire survey based on stakeholders or beneficiary perception. The questionnaire was drafted to gauge the responder’s perception on how they have benefitted from the newly constructed railway under pass. In this survey respondents are required to designate their reply on a five point Likert-type scale where 1 registers Strongly Disagree reaction and 5 point register’s Strongly Agree reaction. Data was collected from 383 respondents using random sampling technique between May, 2018 and June, 2018. Only 357 number of responses are selected for analysis and the remaining are found to be unfit due to deficiency. Analysis (statistical) of data was done by statistical package for social science (SPSS) software. Overall, the results depicted that the respondents living nearby constructed railway under pass are immensely benefited from the project.

1.
R. P.
Bagozzi
, and
Y.
Yi
, “On the evaluation of structural equation models”,
Journal of the academy of marketing science
, (
Springer
,
Switzerland
,
1988
), pp.
74
94
.
2.
T.
Frankel
and
J. W.
Laplume
,
19 Annual Review of Banking Law
, pp.
203
(
2000
).
3.
S.
Olander
, and
A.
Landin
, “Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects”,
International Journal of Project Management
(
Elsevier
,
Netherlands
,
2005
), pp.
321
328
.
4.
P.
Legris
and
P.
Collerette
, “Roadmap for it project implementation: integrating stakeholders and change”,
Project Management Journal
(
PMI
,
USA
,
2006
), pp.
64
76
.
5.
S.
Olander
, “Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management”,
Construction management and economics
, (
Taylor and Francis
,
UK
,
2007
), pp.
277
287
.
6.
S.
Rowlinson
, and
Y. K. F.
Cheung
, “Stakeholder management through empowerment: modelling project success”,
Construction Management and Economics
, (
Taylor and Francis
,
UK
,
2008
) pp.
611
623
.
7.
N. H.
Nguyen
,
M.
Skitmore
, and
J. K. W.
Wong
, “Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: a study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam”,
Construction Management and Economics
, (
Taylor and Francis
,
UK
,
2009
), pp.
1129
1140
.
8.
A. S.
Ali
, and
I.
Rahmat
, “The performance measurement of construction projects managed by ISO-certified contractors in Malaysia”,
Journal of Retail & Leisure Property
, (
Springer
,
Switzerland
,
2010
), pp.
25
35
.
9.
O. A.
Awodele
, and
D. R.
Ogunsemi
, “An assessment of success factors and benefits of project partnering in Nigerian construction industry”,
W092-Special Track 18th CIB World Building Congress
(
Salford
,
United Kingdom
,
2010
), p.
180
181
.
10.
H. S.
Cha
, and
C. K.
Kim
, “Quantitative approach for project performance measurement on building construction in South Korea”,
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
, (
Springer
,
Switzerland
,
2011
), pp.
1319
1328
.
11.
G.
Ofori
,
“Developing the Construction Industry in Ghana: the case for a central agency”, A concept paper prepared for improving the construction industry in Ghana
,
27
46
(
2012
).
12.
W. S.
Han
,
A. M.
Yusof
,
S.
Ismail
and
N.C.
Aun
, “Reviewing the notions of construction project success”,
International Journal of Business and Management
, (
Proquest
,
Michigan
,
2012
), pp.
90
.
13.
Z.
Roxanne
,
V. K.
Cheung
and
Turner
, “
Project managers understanding of stakeholder satisfaction
”,
Project Preospective
,
10
15
(
2012
).
14.
V.
Chovichien
, and
T. A.
Nguyen
, “
List of indicators and criteria for evaluating construction project success and their weight assignment
”,
4th International Conference on Engineering Project and Production Management
, (
2013
), pp.
130
150
.
15.
L. R.
Yang
,
K. S.
Wu
, and
C. F.
Huang
, “Validation of a model measuring the effect of a project manager’s leadership style on project performance”.
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
, (
Springer
,
Switzerland
,
2013
), pp.
271
280
.
16.
M.
Aminu
,
R.
Unkels
,
M.
Mdegela
,
B.
Utz
,
S.
Adaji
, and
den N.
Broek
, “Causes of and factors associated with stillbirth in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review”,
An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
, (
Wiley
,
USA
,
2014
), pp.
141
153
.
17.
E.
Elwakil
, “Integrating analytical hierarchy process and regression for assessing construction organizations’ performance”,
International Journal of Construction Management
, (
Taylor and Francis
,
UK
,
2017
), pp.
76
88
.
18.
S.
Hussain
,
F.
Zhu
,
Z.
Ali
, and
X.
Xu
, “Rural residents’ perception of construction project delays in Pakistan”,
Sustainability
, (
MDPI AG
,
Switzerland
,
2017
), pp.
2108
.
19.
S.
Nketia
, “
Stakeholders’ Perception of Construction Project Success at Asutifi North District Assembly”, PhD. Thesis
,
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
,
2017
.
20.
B. D. C.
Rathenam
, and
N. L.
Dabup
, “Impact of Community Engagement on Public Construction Projects-- Case Study of Hammanskraal Pedestrian Bridge, City of Tshwane, South Africa”,
Universal Journal of Management
, (
Horizon Research
,
USA
,
2017
), pp.
418
428
.
21.
N. B. M.
Sharif
,
A. R.
Kookhdan
, and
A.
Mardani
, “Enhancing The Performance Of Residential Construction Project Through Stakeholder Satisfaction: The Application Of Structural Equation Modelling (Sem)”,
Transformations in Business & Economics
, (
Kaunas Faculty
,
Vilnius
,
2018
), p.
44
.
22.
K. K.
Tripathi
, and
K. N.
Jha
, “An empirical study on performance measurement factors for construction organizations”.
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
, (
Springer
,
Switzerland
,
2018
), pp.
1
15
.
23.
A.
Ojha
, and
L.
Gupta
, “Study on the Information Technology Impact Questionnaire ITIQ on the Construction Industry in India”, in
Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies
(
ASCE
,
Reston, VA
,
2018
), pp.
552
557
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.