In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the students in four categories by developing innovative technology supported laboratory applications by using Logger Pro sensors on the constant acceleration motion in 11th grade. The research was applied to 84 students in 2018-2019 academic year. In this research, one of the action types, liberating / developing / critical action research method was used. Within the scope of the research, in the courses where STEM was applied, the hope of learning and job satisfaction, attitude towards science, attitude towards mathematics and attitudes towards engineering were examined. Data were obtained through interview and quantitative findings. Quantitative findings were analyzed by ANOVA in SPSS 22 program. As a result of the analyzes, it is determined that different fields, satisfaction with the field and gender create significant differences on STEM’s hopes and targets.

Topics
Education, Interviews
1.
A.
 
Kumaş
, Fizik Öğretiminde REACT Öğretim Stratejisine Dayalı Olarak Geliştirilen Yenilikçi Teknoloji Destekli Zenginleştirilmiş Öğretmen Rehber Materyallerinin Değerlendirilmesi, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation),
Karadeniz Technical University
,
2015
.
2.
M.
 
Icel
 &
M.
 
Davis
,
Stem Focused High School And University Partnership: Alternative Solution For Senioritis Issue And Creating Students’ Stem Curiosity
,
Journal of STEM Education
(
2018
),
19
(
1
),
5
–
12
.
Google Scholar
 
3.
J. H.
 
Frost
,
J.
 
Coomes
 &
K.
 
Lindeblad
,
Partnership paves the way to college success
,
Journal of Staff Development
(
2012
),
33
(
5
),
24
.
Google Scholar
 
4.
Y.
 
Morgan
,
R.
 
Sinatra
, &
R.
 
Eschenauer
,
A comprehensive partnership approach increasing high school graduation rates and college enrollment of urban economically disadvantaged youth
,
Education and Urban Society
(
2015
),
47
(
5
),
596
–
620
, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124514536437
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
J.
 
Noble
,
B.
 
Roberts
 &
R. L.
 
Sawyer
, Student achievement, behavior, perceptions and other factors affecting ACT scores, (ACT Research Report No. 2006-1).
Iowa City, IA
:
ACT, Inc
.
6.
C. R.
 
Nunley
 &
K. W.
 
Gemberling
,
High school/college partnerships that get students going
,
The Education Digest
,
64
(
7
),
61
, (
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
K. M.
 
Watt
,
D.
 
Johnston
,
J.
 
Huerta
,
I. D.
 
Mendiola
 &
E.
 
Alkan
,
Retention of first-generation college-going seniors in the college preparatory program AVID
,
American Secondary Education
(
2008
),
37
(
1
),
17
–
40
.
Google Scholar
 
8.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)
,
Report to the President Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology
,
Engineering and Mathematics
, (
2012
).
9.
A.
 
Lisberg
 &
B.
 
Woods
,
Mentorship, Mindset and Learning Strategies: An Integrative Approach to Increasing Underrepresented Minority Student Retention in a Stem Undergraduate Program
,
Journal of STEM Education
 
19
(
3
),
14
–
20
, (
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
10.
J.
 
Novak
,
Meaningful learning: the essential factor of conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners
,
Science Education
(
2002
),
86
,
548
–
571
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
T. S.
 
Hilbert
 &
A.
 
Renkl
,
Concept mapping as a followup strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers?
 
Instructional Science
(
2008
),
36
,
53
–
73
. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9022-9
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
S.Ö.
 
Bütüner
, Matematik Tarihi Etkinlikleri ile Yetiştirilmiş Sınıf Ortamlarından Yansımalar: Bir Aksiyon Araştırması,
Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi
,
Trabzon
,
2014
.
13.
H.
 
Demircioğlu
 &
S.
 
Vural
,
Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin (OBYM), Sekizinci Sınıf Düzeyindeki Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Kimya Dersine Yönelik Tutumları Üzerine Etkisi
,
HAYEF Journal of Education
(
2016
),
13
(
1
),
49
–
60
.
Google Scholar
 
14.
L.
 
Cohen
,
L.
 
Manion
, &
K.
 
Morrison
,
Research Methods in Education
,
London
:
Routledge Falmer
.
2000
.
Google Scholar
 
15.
D.
 
Ekiz
, Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntem ve Metotlarına Giriş; Nitel,
Nicel ve Eleştirel Kuram Metodolojileri
,
Ankara
,
Anı Yayıncılık
.
2003
.
Google Scholar
 
16.
S.
 
Yaman
,
A. S.
 
Tungaç
 &
B. B.
 
İncebacak
,
STEM eğitimine yönelik umut ve hedefler ölçeği uyarlaması: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması
,
Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
(
2019
),
27
(
3
),
1257
–
1271
.
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3056
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
G. E.
 
Mills
,
Action Research: A Guide For the Teachers Researcher
,
Upper Saddle River
,
NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall
,
2003
.
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2019 Author(s).
2019
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.