In view of the severe power crisis in Bangladesh, the government decided to use the quick rental power plants (QRPPs) as its important strategic technique to reduce power shortage in the shortest possible time. Under this strategy, several QRPPs were commissioned with a total capacity of more than 1000 MW. All the quick rental power plants are based on reciprocating engines. About 35.52 % of total generation capacity around 17,043 MW comes from reciprocating engine power plant. The goal of this paper is to perform a life cycle analysis of a 10.2 MW natural gas fired reciprocating engine (RE) power plant, which is being operated to supply electric power to a cement factory, Seven Circle Cement Company at Ghorasal, Narsingdi. The study reveals that the direct combustion of natural gas during the operational phase consumes maximum energy at 91.36% and the contribution of hidden processes is about 9%. Out of this 9%, the production of materials, manufacturing of equipmentand transportation is 0.50%, plant operation and maintenance 0.22%, and fuel cycle 7.91% of the total life cycle energy inputs. However, the energy consumption in decommissioning phases is negligible. This study also reveals that the major GHG emission is accounted for direct combustion of the fuel during operation of the power plant. The total GHG emissions from the 10.2 MW Reciprocating Engine (RE) power plant was estimated to be 672.22 g-CO2eq/kWh with the lifecycle efficiency of 34.21% and plant fuel efficiency of 37.45%.

1.
Mustfa K
Mujeri
and
Tahreen Tahrima
Chowdhury
, “
Quick Rental Power Plants in Bangladesh:AnEconomic Appraisal
”,
Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
,
Dhaka
, June 1013.
2.
Bangladesh Power Development Board
, http://www.bpdb.gov.bd/bpdb/
3.
Paul J
Meier
, “
Life-Cycle Assessment ofElectricity Generation Systems andApplications forClimateChange Policy Analysis
”, PhD thesis,
the University of Wisconsin
,
Madison
, Aug
2002
.
4.
Jean-Paul
Rodrigue
 et al, “The Geography of Transport”,
Hofstra University
,
New York, USA
, January
2016
.
5.
Kannan
 et al, “
Gas fired combined cycle plant in Singapore: energy use, GWP andcost – a life cycle approach
”,
Elsivier, Energy Conversion & Management
,
46
(
2005
)
2145
2157
, 24 October
2004
.
6.
Fiji C
George
 et al., “Life-Cycle Emissions ofNatural GasandCoal in the Power Sector”,
The National Petroleum Council (NPC
),
USA
, September,
2011
.
7.
Timothy J.
Skone
 et al.,“Life Cycle Analysis of Natural GasExtraction and Power Generation”, May 29,
2014
,
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL
),
USA
.
8.
Hiroki
Hondol
, “
Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generationSystems: Japanese case
”,
Elsevier, Energy
30
(
2005
)
2042
2056
.
9.
Spath
 et al, “Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System”,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
,
Midwest Research Institute
,
USA
. September
2000
.
10.
Hoch
and
R T
Carson
, Jr
., “ An EnergyOriented Input-OutputModel”,
Research Project 1366-1, Topical Report
, August
1984
,
Resources for the Future, Inc.
,
USA
.
11.
Sullivan
 et al, “Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission Analysis of Vehicle and Component Manufacturing”,
Center for Transportation Research Energy System Division
,
Agronne National Laboratory
, September
2010
12.
HenrikWanzel
 et al., “Environmental Tools in Product Development”,
ProceedingsofIEEE International Symposium on Electronics
. (pp.
100
105
).
IEEE
.
1994
.
13.
Paulina
Jaramillo
,
A Life Cycle Comparison of Coal and NaturalGas for ElectricityGeneration and the Production of Transportation Fuels
. PhD Thesis in
Civil and Environment EngineeringatCarnegieMellon University
,
Pennsylvania
, December
2007
.
14.
Varun
 et al, “
Life Cycle Analysis of Run-of River Small Hydro Powerin India
”,
The Open Renewable Energy Journal
,
2008
,
1
,
11
16
.
15.
Theo
Notteboom
 etal., “
Fuel surcharge practices of container shipping lines :is it about cost recovery or revenue making?
”,
Proceedings of the 2009, International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference
, June
2009
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
.
16.
The Geography of transport system
, “
Fuel Consumption by Containership
”.
17.
Jacques
Leonardi
 et al, “
Methods for assessing the carbon footprint of maritimeFreighttransport: European case study and results
”.
Logistics Research Network Annual Conference
9-11 September 2009
.
18.
Cefic and ECTA
, “
Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission fromFreightTransport Operations
”, issued1/March
2011
.
19.
Harilaos N.
Psaraftis
 et al., “
CO2 Emission Statistics for theWorld CommercialFleet
”,
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs
,
2009
.
20.
J.H.J.
Hulskotte
 et al., “
International Survey of fuel consumption of seagoing ships at berth
”,
Clean North Sea Shipping (CNSS)
March
2014
.
21.
Yoshioka
K
 et al., “
An application of input-output approach in environmental analysis: estimating CO2 emission from fossil-fired and Nuclear power generation
”,
Innov I_O Tech
1994
;
5
(
1
):
31
56
[In Japanese].
22.
Dhaka Electric Supply Company Limited (DESCO)
, https://www.desco.org.bd/index.php
23.
Qiuhonget
al
., “
Life Cycle Assessment of Diesel Engine based on anIntegrated Hybrid Inventory Analysis Model
.
24.
A.T.D.
Fernando
, ”
Embodied Energy Analysis of New Zealand Power Generation Systems
” Master thesis,
University of Canturbury
,
2010
.
25.
Financial Express
, “
Quick rental power plants
, 16 May
2012
, cited on 07 May 2016.
26.
Mary
AnnCurran
, “Life Cycle Assessment Handbook”, edited by
Mary Ann
Curran
, Cincinnati, OH, published by
Scrivener Publishing LLC
,
Massachusetts
, Co-published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
27.
Michael
Wang
, “GREET Life Cycle Model2_2013”.
Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division
,
Argonne National Laboratory
,
USA
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.