This study explores hourly data for 9 air pollutants and 6 meteorological variables in Dimitrovgrad, Bulgaria for a period of one year. Factor analysis is applied for the classification of the variables. A grouping of pollutants and meteorological hazard is established in 7 artificial factors, which allows the explanation of relationships between variables and mutual sources of air pollution. As one of the key problematic air pollutant, PM10 is identified with an average value over the year of 58.7 micrograms per cubic meter. Using SARIMA method from the Box-Jenkins methodology with seasonal parameter s = 24 hours, models of PM10 with transfer functions are constructed and analyzed. For realistic forecasting of PM10 values at future times, it is necessary to know the data of both the meteorological variables and air pollutants that are precursors of PM10, on which its concentrations depend. For this purpose, SARIMA is applied in two successive steps. First, models are developed to forecast each precursor depending on the weather variables. In a second step, the obtained forecasted precursor and meteorological data are used to model and forecast PM10. The constructed models explain the considered data set with 68% to 86% and RMSE = 0.133. The forecast of PM10 pollution is calculated for 168 hours after the period with data not used in the modeling process.

1.
European Commission
,
Air Quality Standards: Environment.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm.
2.
Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe
,
Official J. European Union, L
152
(
1
) (
2008
).
3.
European Environment Agency
,
Air quality in Europe — 2018 report
,
EEA Report
,
12
(
2018
). https://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/air-quality-in-europe-2018.
4.
S. S.
Lim
,
T.
Vos
,
A. D.
Flaxman
,
G.
Danaei
,
K.
Shibuya
,
H.
Adair-Rohani
, et al.,
A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
,
The Lancet
380
(
9859
),
2224
2260
(
2013
)..
5.
M. F.
Piepoli
,
A. W.
Hoes
,
S.
Agewall
,
C.
Albus
,
C.
Brotons
, et al.,
2016
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
,
European Heart J.
37
(
29
),
2315
2381
(2016).
6.
J.
Brodny
and
M.
Tutak
,
Analysis of the diversity in emissions of selected gaseous and particulate pollutants in the European Union countries
,
J. Environ. Manag.
231
,
582
595
(
2019
).
7.
A.
Vlachogianni
,
P.
Kassomenos
,
A.
Karppinen
,
S.
Karakitsios
, and
J.
Kukkonen
,
Evaluation of a multiple regression model for the forecasting of the concentrations of NOx and PM10 in Athens and Helsinki
,
Sci. Tot. Environ.
409
(
8
),
1559
1571
(
2011
).
8.
K. Y.
Ng
and
N.
Awang
,
Multiple linear regression and regression with time series error models in forecasting PM10 concentrations in Peninsular Malaysia
,
Environ. Monit. Assess.
190
(
63
),
1
11
(
2018
)..
9.
I.
Zheleva
,
E.
Veleva
, and
M.
Filipova
, “
Analysis and modeling of daily air pollutants in the city of Ruse, Bulgaria
”, in
AIP Conference Proceedings
,
1895
, edited by
M.
Todorov
(American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY,
2017
),
030007
.
10.
L.
Jian
,
Y.
Zhao
,
Y. P.
Zhu
,
M. B.
Zhang
, and
D.
Bertolatti
,
An application of ARIMA model to predict submicron particle concentrations from meteorological factors at a busy roadside in Hangzhou, China
,
Sci. Tot. Environ.
426
,
336
345
(
2012
).
11.
R.
Kumar
and
A. E.
Joseph
,
Air pollution concentrations of PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 at ambient and Kerbsite and their correlation in Metro City-Mumbai
,
Environ. Monit. Assess.
119
(
1-3
),
191
199
(
2006
).
12.
O.
Kisi
,
K.S.
Parmar
,
K.
Soni
, and
V.
Demir
,
Modeling of air pollutants using least square support vector regression, multivariate adaptive regression spline, and M5 model tree models
,
Air Qual. Atmos. Health
,
10
,
873
883
(
2017
)..
13.
D.
Voukantsis
,
K.
Karatzas
,
J.
Kukkonen
,
Intercomparison of air quality data using principal component analysis, and forecasting of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations using artificial neural networks, in Thessaloniki and Helsinki
,
Sci. Tot. Environ.
409
(
7
), pp.
1266
1276
(
2011
).
14.
C.
Zhao
and
G.
Song
,
Application of data mining to the analysis of meteorological data for air quality prediction: A case study in Shenyang
,
Earth and Environ. Sci.
81
,
012070
(
2017
).
15.
A.
Prakash
,
U.
Kumar
,
K.
Kumar
, and
V.
Jain
,
A wavelet-based neural network model to predict ambient air pollutants’ concentration
,
Environ. Model. Asses.
16
(
5
),
503
517
(
2011
).
16.
C. E.
Reid
,
M.
Jerrett
,
M. L.
Petersen
, and
G. G.
Pfister
,
Spatiotemporal prediction of fine particulate matter during the 2008 Northern California Wildfires using machine learning
,
Environ. Sci. Technol.
49
(
6
),
3887
3896
(
2015
).
17.
D. Z.
Antanasijević
,
V. V.
Pocajt
,
D. S.
Povrenović
,
M. D.
Ristić
, and
A. A.
Perić-Grujić
,
PM10 emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization
,
Sci. Total Environ.
443
,
511
519
(
2013
).
18.
A. J.
Izenman
,
Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques Regression, Classification, and Manifold Learning
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2008
).
19.
G. E. P.
Box
,
G. M.
Jenkins
, and
G. S.
Reinsel
,
Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control
, 3rd ed. (
Prentice-Hall Inc.
,
New Jersey
,
1994
).
20.
Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Waters
,
Annual report for 2013
, https://haskovo.riosv.com/files/DOKLADI%20OS/2014/GOD.DOKLAD%20RIOSV%20HS.2013.pdf (in Bulgarian).
21.
I. K.
Yeo
and
R. A.
Johnson
,
A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry
,
Biometrika
87
(
4
),
954
959
(
2000
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.