Daylight performance in indoor spaces nowadays are commonly represented by the currently emerging climate-based daylight metrics (CBDM), which can be directly predicted using sophisticated daylight simulation tools. Several alternative simulation tools are not capable to directly simulate the CBDM but are capable to simulate point-in-time illuminance, which can be employed as proxy to calculate CBDM. This paper aims to demonstrate the use of monthly median illuminance in a hypothetical indoor space, to predict daylight autonomy (DA) and useful daylight illuminance (UDI), based on two design parameters, namely window-to-wall ratio (WWR) and facade orientation. Four variations of WWR, i.e. 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and four variations of orientation, i.e. north, east, south, west, were simulated using VELUX Daylight Visualizer, while observing median illuminance at 08.00, 12.00, and 16.00 hrs each month, to predict DA300lx and UDI100∼2000lx. Based on simulations, WWR is found to have the most impact on the UDI100∼2000lx.

1.
C.F.
Reinhart
,
S.
Herkel
, “
The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distributions — a state-of-the-art comparison of six RADIANCE-based methods
,”
Energy Build.
, vol
32
(
2
), pp.
167
187
,
2000
.
2.
C.F.
Reinhart
,
O.
Walkenhorst
, “
Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds
,”
Energy Build.
, vol.
33
(
7
), pp.
683
697
,
2001
.
3.
O.
Walkenhorst
,
J.
Luther
,
C.F.
Reinhart
,
J.
Timmer
, “
Dynamic annual daylight simulations based on one-hour and one-minute means of irradiance data
,”
Sol. Energy
, vol.
72
(
5
), pp.
385
395
,
2002
.
4.
C.F.
Reinhart
,
D.A.
Weismann
, “
The daylit area – Correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics
,”
Build. Environ.
, vol.
50
, pp.
155
164
,
2011
.
5.
C.E.
Ochoa
,
M.B.C.
Aries
,
E.J.
van Loenen
,
J.L.M.
Hensen
, “
Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort
,”
Appl. Energy
, vol.
95
, pp.
238
245
,
2012
.
6.
R.A.
Mangkuto
,
M.
Rohmah
,
A.D.
Asri
, “
Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: A case study of buildings in the tropics
,”
Appl. Energy
, vol.
164
, pp.
211
219
,
2016
.
7.
VELUX A/S
, “
VELUX Daylight Visualizer
,” http://www.velux.com/article/2016/daylight-visualizer,
2016
.
8.
R.
Labayrade
,
H.W.
Jensen
,
C.
Jensen
, “
Validation of VELUX Daylight Visualizer 2 against CIE 171:2006 test cases
”,
Proceedings of Building Simulation 2009, IBPSA
, pp.
1506
1513
,
2009
.
9.
Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage [CIE]
, CIE 171:2006 - Test Cases to Assess the Accuracy of Lighting Computer Programs,
Vienna
,
CIE
,
2006
.
10.
A.
Nabil
,
J.
Mardaljevic
, “
Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors
,”
Energy Build.
, vol.
38
(
7
), pp.
905
913
,
2006
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.