Critical thinking skills are required by undergraduate biology students to be able to face global challenges and achieve success in life and at work. Guided Inquiry-Blended Learning (GI-BL) is a strategy that can be developed in the plant physiology lectures to promote students’ critical thinking skills. Online interactions complement the Guided Inquiry strategy to assist learner both in learning how to communicate and facing any difficulties. This study aimed to test the hypothesis whether GI-BL could affect biology students’ critical thinking skills. This study employed a quasi- experimental approach with pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research was conducted at the Biology Department of Universitas Negeri Malang. The sample consisted of 35 students from the experimental class which was learned with Guided Inquiry-Blended Learning (GI-BL), 29 students from the first control class which was learned with Structured Inquiry-Blended Learning (SI-BL), and 25 students from the second control class which was learned with Structured Inquiry (SI). Data of the research was collected using a critical thinking test. Data on the students’ critical thinking skills was analyzed using paired t-test to determine the effectiveness of each strategy, ANACOVA with 5% significance level to investigate the difference in students’ critical thinking skills after learning with three learning strategies tested, and Cohen-d to determine the size effect of each treatment. The results showed that GI- BL and SI-BL had a significant effect on the students’ critical thinking skills; however, GI-BL was proven more effective in improving the ability of the students to recognize assumptions, evaluate arguments and interpret arguments. The present study provides an empirical basis for implementing GI-BL to improve the critical thinking of undergraduate biology students.

1.
N.
Pheeraphan
,
Enhancement of the 21st Century Skills for Thai Higher Education by Integration of ICT in Classroom
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2015
), Vol.
103
, pp.
365
373
.
2.
C.d.
Jerald
,
Defining a 21st Century Education
(
For the Center for Public Education
,
USA
,
2009
)
3.
F.A.
Ay
,
A.
Karakaya
, &
K.
Yimaz
,
Relations Between Self-leadership and Critical Thinking Skills
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2015
), Vol.
207
, pp.
29
41
.
4.
C.
Friedel
,
T.
Irani
,
R.
Rudd
,
M.
Gallo
,
E.
Eckhardt
, &
J.
Ricketts
,
Overtly Teaching Critical Thinking and Inquiry-Based Learning: A Comparison of Two Undergraduate Biotechnology Classes
,
Journal of Agricultural Education
49
,
72
84
(
2008
).
5.
Slameto
,
Developing Critical Thinking Skills through School Teacher Training ‘Training and Development Personnel’ Model and their Determinants of Success
,
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
4
,
161
166
(
2014
).
6.
S. A.
Rodzalan
&
M. M.
Saat
,
The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2015
), Vol.
172
, pp.
725
732
.
7.
American Association for the Advancement of Science
,
Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education a Call to Action
(
Directorate for Education and Human Resources
,
Washington DC
,
2011
).
8.
R.
Suciati
, The Difference of Critical Thinking Ability’s Student among Problem-Based Learning Model with Expository Model On Evolution Subject,
Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi 2015
(
Malang
,
2015
), pp.
351
358
.
9.
R.
Shakir
,
Soft Skills at the Malaysian Institutes of Higher Learning
,
Asia Pasific Educ
10
,
309
315
(
2009
).
10.
T. M..
Addy
&
M. O.
Stevenson
,
National Association of Biology Teachers 2012 Research Symposium: NABT Four-Year College and University Section’s
(
Dallas Texas
,
2012
)
11.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
,
The PISA 2003 Assesment Framework- Mathematic, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills
(
OECD Publication
,
Paris
,
2013
).
12.
P.
Turiman
,
J.
Omar
,
A. M.
Daud
, &
K.
Osman
,
Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2012
), Vol.
59
, pp.
110
116
.
13.
P.-H.
Wang
,
P. –L.
Wu
,
K.-W.
Yu
, &
Y-X
,
Lin
,
Influence of Implementing Inquiry-Based Instruction on Science Learning Motivation and Interest: A Perspective of Comparison
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2015
), Vol.
174
, pp.
1292
1299
.
14.
C. C.
Kuhlthau
,
Guided Inquiry: School Libraries in the 21st Century, International Association of School Librarians Conference
(
Padua Italia
,
2009
), pp.
17
28
.
15.
National Research Council
,
National Science Education Standards
(
National Academy Press
,
Washington, DC
,
1996
).
16.
J.
Sriarunrasmee
,
P.
Suwannatthachote
, &
P.
Dachakupt
,
Virtual Field Trips with Inquiry Learning and Critical Thinking Process: A Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Science Learning Outcomes
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2015
), Vol.
197
, pp.
1721
1726
.
17.
D.
Llewellyn
,
Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation
(
A SAGE Company
,
USA
,
2011
).
18.
M.
Jauhar
,
Implementasi Paikem Dari Behavioristik Sampai Konstruktivistik
(
Prestasi Pustaka Publisher
,
2011
, Jakarta).
19.
O. E.
Ifeoma
&
E. K.
Oge
,
Effects of Guided Inquiry Method on Secondary School Student’ Performance in Social Studies Curriculum In Anambra State, Nigeria
,
British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science
3
,
206
222
(
2013
).
20.
A. S. A.
Hasan
, “
The Effects of Guided Inquiry Instruction on Students
Achievement and Understanding of the Nature of Science in Environmental Biology Course
,” Doctor Dissertation,
The British University
,
2012
.
21.
D. M.
Hanson
,
Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning
(
Stony Brook University
,
USA
,
2006
).
22.
Z.
Akyol
,
D. R.
Garrison
, &
M. Y.
Ozden
,
Development of a Community of Inquiry in Online and Blended Learning Contexts
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2009
), Vol.
1
, pp.
1834
1838
.
23.
P. V.
Vinu
,
P. C.
Sherimon
, &
R.
Krishnan
,
Towards Pervasive Mobile Learning – the Vision of 21st Century
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2011
), Vol.
15
, pp.
3067
3073
.
24.
S.
Weisler
,
R.
Bellin
,
S.
Lee
, &
N.
Stillings
,
An Inquiry-based Approach to E-learning: The CHAT Digital Learning Environment
(
National Science Foundation
,
USA
,
2001
).
25.
D.
Bath
&
J.
Baurke
,
Getting Started with Blended Learning
(
Griffith University
,
Australia
,
2015
)
26.
S.
Hande
,
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats of Blended Learning: Students’ Perceptions
,
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
4
,
336
339
(
2014
).
27.
A. –K.
Mayer
,
N.
Leichner
,
J.
Peter
,
A.
Guenther
, &
G.
Krampen
,
Developing a Blended Learning Approach to Foster Information Literacy in German Psychology Education
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2013
), Vol.
93
, pp.
1259
1262
.
28.
K. C. D.
Tan
&
M.
Kim
,
Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research
(
Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London
,
New York
,
2012
.
29.
P. D.
Leedy
&
J.E.
Omrod
,
Practical Research
(
Pearson
,
New Jearsey
,
2005
).
30.
T.
Bunterm
,
K.
Lee
,
J. N. L.
Kong
,
S.
Srikoon
,
P.
Vangpoomyai
,
J.
Rattanavongsa
, & Rachahoon,
Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes?
A comparison between Guided and Structured Inquiry, International Journal of Science Education
36
,
1937
1959
(
2014
).
31.
Discovery Education, Directed Inquiry versus Guided Inquiry
(
2010
), available at https://static.discoveryeducation.com/techbook/pdf/DirectedInquiryvsGuidedInquiry.pdf.
32.
N.
Rodniam
,
The Effect of Blended Learning Approach Using Facebook and Learning Experiences Outside the Classroom on an Inquiring Mind of Freshmen in Teacher Education Program at Institute of Physical Education, Chumphon Campus
,
International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management
23
(
3
),
98
104
(
2015
).
33.
J. J.
Watters
&
C. M.
Diezzman
, Reforming Education: The pursuit of Learning through Authentic Inquiry in Mathematics, Science and Technology, International Conference To Review Research On Science, Technology And Mathematics Education.
International Centre
(
Goa India
,
2004
).
34.
M. R.
Blanchard
,
S. A.
Southerland
, &
M.
Granger
,
No Silver Bullet for Inquiry: Making Sense of Teacher Change Following an Inquiry-based Research Experience for Teachers
,
Science Teacher Education
,
323
360
(
2008
).
35.
M.
Won
, “Issues In Inquiry-Based Science Education Seen Through Dewey’s Theory Of Inquiry,” Doctor Dissertation,
Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois
,
2009
.
36.
M.
Haghparast
,
N. F.
Hanum
, &
N.
Abdullah
,
Modeling an E-Learning Tool to Cultivate Critical Thinking in Students based on Information Needs and Seeking Behavior, International Conference on Teaching
,
Assessment and Learning for Engineering
(
Kuta Indonesia
,
2013
), pp.
521
526
.
37.
H. I.
Akyuz
, &
S.
Samsa
,
The Effects of Blended Learning Environment on The Critical Thinking Skills of Students
,
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences
(
2009
), Vol.
1
, pp.
1744
1748
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.