Problem-solving ability as one of the life skills is an essential outcome in physics learning. Students still find difficulties in solving physics problems, especially on non-routine issues. Efforts are needed to find ways to overcome these difficulties. Can e-scaffolding in hybrid learning help students to improve their ability to solve physics problems? This study aims to determine the impact of e-scaffolding on hybrid learning on the ability to solve physics problems. This mixed method research employed an embedded design to 2 groups of freshman majoring in physics at the State University of Malang. Experimental group that learned physics through e-scaffolding in hybrid learning consisted of 26 students, while the comparison group that learned through direct instruction consisted of 23 students. The research data were collected by giving the non-routine problems to both groups of students and analyzed using ANCOVA. The results showed that students who learned through e-scaffolding in hybrid learning could solve physics problems higher than that of students who learned through direct instruction (p <0.01). E-scaffolding in hybrid learning constructs the student’s thinking pattern more systematically in solving the problem, so it helps students to grasp fundamental conceptual understanding in developing ways of finding solutions and direct their attention to identifying goals and constraints on solutions. It is suggested that lecturers use e-scaffolding in hybrid learning in the Basic Physics course so that lecturers can provide appropriate assistance to overcome student’s difficulties in solving non-routine problems.

1.
R. J.
Beichner
,
2002
.
GOAL oriented problem solving
. Retrieved September 30, 2017, from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/pams/physics/Physics_Ed/Authors/Beichner.html
2.
J.
Milbourne
, &
E.
Wiebe
,
2018
.
The role of content knowledge in ill-structured problem solving for high school physics students
.
Res Sci Educ
,
48
:
165
179
. DOI .
3.
McDermott & Redish, 1999.
McDermott
,
C. L.
, &
Redish
,
E. F.
(
1999
).
Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research
.
American Journal of Physics
,
67
,
755
767
.
4.
J. D.
Bransford
and
D. L.
Schwartz
,
1999
.
Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications
.
Review of Research in Education.
24
, pp.
61
100
.
5.
L. C.
McDermott
,
1984
.
Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics
.
Physics Today
,
37
(
7
):
24
32
. DOI .
6.
D. E.
Brown
&
J.
Clement
,
1989
.
Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction
.
Instructional Science
,
18
(
4
), pp
237
261
.
7.
K. A.
Strike
and
G. J.
Posner
,
1992
. A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In
R.
Duschl
&
R.
Hamilton
(eds.),
Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice
(pp.
147
176
).
Albany, NY
:
SUNY Press
.
8.
B. R.
Belland
,
A.
Walker
,
N.
Kim
, &
M.
Lefler
,
2014
.
A preliminary meta-analysis on the influence of scaffolding characteristics and study and assessment quality on cognitive outcomes in STEM education
.
Presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
,
Québec City, Canada
.
9.
J.
van de Pol
,
M.
Volman
, &
J.
Beishuizen
,
2010
.
Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research
.
Educational Psychology Review
,
22
(
3
),
271
296
..
10.
B. J.
Reiser
,
2004
.
Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work
.
Journal of the Learning Sciences
,
13
(
3
),
273
304
..
11.
B. R.
Belland
,
2011
.
Distributed cognition as a lens to understand the effects of scaffolds: The role of transfer of responsibility
.
Educational Psychology Review
,
23
(
4
),
577
600
..
12.
B. R.
Belland
,
R.
Burdo
, &
J.
Gu
,
2015
.
A blended professional development program to help a teacher learn to provide one-to-one scaffolding
.
Journal of Science Teacher Education
,
26
(
3
),
263
289
..
13.
A. C.
Graesser
,
C.
Bowers
,
D. J.
Hacker
, &
N.
Person
,
1997
. Anatomy of naturalistic tutoring. In
K.
Hogan
&
M.
Pressley
(Eds.),
Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues
(pp.
145
184
).
Cambridge, MA, USA
:
Brookline Books
.
14.
K.
VanLehn
,
2011
.
The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems
.
Educational Psychologist
,
46
(
4
),
197
221
..
15.
B. R.
Belland
,
J.
Gu
,
S.
Armbrust
, &
B.
Cook
,
2013
.
Using generic and context-specific scaffolding to support authentic science inquiry
. In
Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013)
(pp.
185
192
).
Fort Worth, TX, USA
:
IADIS
.
16.
S.
Puntambekar
, &
J. L.
Kolodner
,
2005
.
Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design
.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
,
42
(
2
),
185
217
..
17.
I.
Tabak
,
2004
.
Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding
.
Journal of the Learning Sciences
,
13
(
3
),
305
335
..
18.
K. J.
Crippen
&
L.
Archambault
,
2012
.
Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: A signature pedagogy for STEM education
.
Computers in the Schools
,
29
(
1–2
),
157
173
..
19.
M.
Hannafin
,
S.
Land
, &
K.
Oliver
,
1999
. Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In
C. M.
Reigeluth
(Ed.),
Instructional design theories and models: Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory
(pp.
115
140
).
Mahwah, NJ, USA
:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
.
20.
C.
Quintana
,
B. J.
Reiser
,
E. A.
Davis
,
J.
Krajcik
,
E.
Fretz
,
R. G.
Duncan
,
E.
Kyza
,
D.
Edelson
, &
E.
Soloway
,
2004
.
A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry
.
Journal of the Learning Sciences
,
13
(
3
),
337
386
..
21.
B. R.
Belland
,
A.
Walker
,
M. W.
Olsen
, &
H.
Leary
,
2015
.
A pilot meta-analysis of computer-based scaffolding in STEM education
.
Educational Technology and Society
,
18
(
1
),
183
197
.
22.
G.
Cafri
,
J. D.
Kromrey
, &
M. T.
Brannick
,
2010
.
A meta-meta-analysis: Empirical review of statistical power, type I error rates, effect sizes, and model selection of meta-analyses published in psychology
.
Multivariate Behavioral Research
,
45
(
2
),
239
270
..
23.
A. C. K.
Cheung
, &
R. E
Slavin
,
2013
.
The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis
.
Educational Research Review
,
9
,
88
113
..
24.
F.-R.
Kuo
,
G.-J.
Hwang
, &
C.-C.
Lee
,
2012
.
A hybrid approach to promoting students’ web-based problem-solving competence and learning attitude
.
Computers & Education
,
58
(
1
), pp
351
364
.
25.
G.
Wesiak
,
C. M.
Steiner
,
A.
Moore
,
D.
Dagger
,
G.
Power
,
M.
Berthold
, &
O.
Conlan
,
2014
.
Iterative augmentation of a medical training simulator: Effects of affective metacognitive scaffolding
.
Computers & Education
,
76
, pp
13
29
.
26.
B. R.
Belland
,
2017
. Instructional scaffolding in STEM education: Strategies and efficacy evidence.
New York
:
Springer
.
27.
W. F.
Chen
,
2012
.
An investigation of varied types of blended learning environments on student achievement: an experimental study
.
International Journal of Instructional Media.
39
(
3
), p
205
212
. 8p.
28.
B.
Means
,
Y.
Toyama
,
R.
Murphy
,
M.
Bakia
, and
K.
Jones
,
2009
. Evaluation of Evidence-based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online-learning Studies.
Washington, D.C
.:
U.S. Department of Education
.
29.
K.
Kumpulainen
, and
A.
Mikkola
,
2016
. Toward Hybrid Learning, Educational Engagement and Learning in the Digital Age.
E.
Elstad
(Ed.),
Educational Technology and Polycontextual Bridging
,
15
37
.
30.
N. J.
Kim
,
B. R.
Belland
,
A. E.
Walker
,
2018
.
Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in the context of problem-based learning for STEM education: Bayesian meta-analysis
.
Educ Psychol Rev
,
30
:
397
429
. DOI .
31.
J. W.
Creswell
,
2009
. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Thousand Oaks
,
California: SAGE
.
32.
L. J.
Govaere
,
A.
de Kruif
, &
M.
Valcke
,
2012
.
Differential impact of unguided versus guided use of a multimedia introduction to equine obstetrics in veterinary education
.
Computers & Education
,
58
(
4
), pp
1076
1084
.
33.
B. R.
Belland
, &
J.
Drake
,
2013
.
Toward a framework on how affordances and motives can drive different uses of computer-based scaffolds: Theory, evidence, and design implications
.
Educational Technology Research & Development
,
61
,
903
925
..
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.