International Young Physicists’ Tournament (IYPT) started 31 years ago as the only competition on inquiry problems. It confronts secondary school students with open-ended problems involving phenomena which are not difficult to demonstrate but require nontrivial efforts to explain them, to explore how they depend on relevant parameters, to propose hypotheses and to check them. The competition itself is formatted as a scientific discussion and this requires concise and clear presentation of the results, as well as sharp arguments during the discussion itself. Neither on problem-solving skills, nor on scientific competences could Balkan countries boast about their results in PISA assessments. In view of this one may argue that there is a need for a broader introduction of inquiry problems in our schools. This could be done in many ways and IYPT offers exemplar problems of this type for everybody to use. A lot of countries are reluctant about taking the step to initiate national Tournaments and send teams to IYPT because they find the unusual format of the competition difficult to master and quite often there is a lack of understanding what the jurors’ criteria are. With that in mind, a sort of a demonstration Tournament, together with a simultaneous Workshop, was organized in Sofia this April, encouraged by the project Open Schools for Open Societies of the Horizon 2020 Program for Research and Innovation. The aim of the event was to acquaint the Physics community in the region with the IYPT, to motivate much more teams to participate in it and to help improve their results. The feedback received is encouraging and organizers foresee follow-up Tournaments with participants from more Balkan countries.

1.
OECD
, PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Vol.
I
) (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2014
).
2.
OECD
, PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems (Vol. V) (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2014
).
3.
OECD
, PISA 2015 Results (Vol. I): Excellence and Equity in Education (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2016
).
4.
OECD
, PISA 2015 Results (Vol. V): Collaborative Problem Solving (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2017
).
5.
S.
Wang
,
W.
Gao
(eds), International Young Physicists’ Tournament. Problems & Solutions 2012–2013 (
World Scientific
,
Singapore
,
2014
).
6.
L.
Kewei
,
L.
Jiahuang
,
K. Z.
Yang
,
S.
Liang
, and
J.
Juan
, “
The vertical oscillations of coupled magnets
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
32
,
S1
(
2011
).
7.
Kun ho
Kim
, “
Sound analysis of a cup drum
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
33
,
S25
(
2012
).
8.
M.
Marek
,
M.
Badin
, and
M.
Plesch
, “
Physics of the mechanical toy Gee-Haw Whammy Diddle
,”
Nature Scientific Reports
8
,
1
10
(
2018
).
9.
M.
Niazi
, “
The Electric Honeycomb; an investigation of the Rose window instability
,”
R. Soc. open sci.
4
,
170503
(
2017
).
10.
A.
Kyuldjiev
, “
PISA 2015 assessment, IYPT and education
,”
IYPT Magazine
5
,
4
10
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.