Several advantages of natural plant-derived dyes such as low cost, abundant in supply, sustainability and environmentally-safe make this type of dyes are widely investigated as photo-sensitizers. These dyes are known containing natural compounds (e.g. carotenoids, chlorophylls, anthocyanins) that have electronic delocalization in extended π-orbital system for electronic transfer mechanism. To date, a number of research works were reported to extend the potential of natural dyes as photo-sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). In regard to this matter, extracted dyes from Kappaphycus alvarezii sp., Sargassum polycystum sp. and Manihot esculenta sp. denoted as K, S and C respectively were successfully prepared and several physical characterizations were carried out to analyse their photo-sensitizer properties. From UV-vis and tauc plot, it was found that all extracted dyes exhibited the absorption of wavelength in visible spectrum, concluded the ability of K, S and C as photo-sensitizers with bandgap values of 2.85, 2.41 and 2.10 eV, respectively. SEM surface morphology of C exhibited smooth surface with the existence of long chain of small particles, while S has bigger particles with few pinholes and K showed full coverage of rough surface. From BET analysis, C has highest specific surface area, SBET(5.16 m2g-1) and mesopore volume (0.007 cm3g-1) compared to other dyes, which may contribute to higher adsorption of C particles on TiO2 surface during dye sensitization. Overall solar cell performance of ITO/TiO2/dyes (K or S or C)/carbon obtained was found in similar trends with bandgap and conductivity, with PCE values of C, S and K are 0.6%, 0.18% and 0.06%, respectively. In summary, this study highlighted the promising photo-sensitizer properties of C, S and K for solar cell application and significant factor of specific surface area of dye particles for better solar cell performance of DSSCs.

1.
K.
Solangi
,
M.
Islam
,
R.
Saidur
,
N.
Rahim
, and
H.
Fayaz
,
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
15
,
2149
2163
(
2011
).
2.
C.Y.
Lee
,
M.K.
Lee
, and
S.H.
Yoo
,
Energy
,
128
,
284
290
(
2017
).
3.
S.M.
Jordaan
,
E.
Romo-Rabago
,
R.
McLeary
,
L.
Reidy
,
J.
Nazari
, and
I. M.
Herremans
,
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
78
,
1397
1409
(
2017
).
4.
M.R.
Narayan
,
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
16
,
208
215
(
2012
).
5.
V.
Shanmugam
,
S.
Manoharan
,
S.
Anandan
and
R.
Murugan
.
Spectrochim. Acta A
104
,
35
(
2013
).
6.
L.K.
Singh
,
T.
Karlo
and
A.
Pandey
.
Spectrochim. Acta A.
118
,
938
(
2014
).
7.
I.K.
Chung
,
C.F.
Sondak
and
J.
Beardall
,
Eur. J. Phycol.
52
,
495
505
(
2017
).
8.
X.F.
Wang
,
C.H.
Zhan
,
T.
Maoka
,
Y.
Wada
and
Y.
Koyama
.
Chem. Phys. Lett.
447
,
79
(
2007
).
9.
R.
Wibowo
and
J.
Gunlazuardi
, in
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
(
IOP Publishing
,
2017
), p.
12047
.
10.
R.
Annam
, and
D.
Deepika
,
Int. J. Chem Tech Res.
8
,
1060
1063
(
2015
).
11.
R.
Kushwaha
,
P.
Srivastava
, and
L.
Bahadur
.
J. Energy.
2013
,
1
8
(
2013
).
12.
F.S.Y.
Watanabe
,
E.
Alcântara
,
T.W.P.
Rodrigues
,
N.N.
Imai
,
C.C.F.
Barbosa
, and
L.H. da S.
Rotta
,
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
12
,
10391
10417
(
2015
).
13.
L.
Limantara
and
T.H.P.
Brotosudarmo
,
Procedia Chem.
14
,
193
201
(
2015
).
14.
A.
Tumuluri
,
K.L.
Naidu
, and
K.C.J.
Raju
,
Int. J. ChemTech Res.
6
,
3353
3356
(
2014
).
16.
A.
Gürses
,
M.
Açıkyıldız
,
K.
Güneş
, and
M.S.
Gürses
, in
Dye. Pigment.
(
Springer
,
2016
), pp.
13
29
.
17.
J.
Janaun
,
S.
Abang
, and
A.M.
Anwar
, in
Clean Energy Technol. (CEAT), 2013 IEEE Conf.
(
IEEE
,
2013
), pp.
19
22
.
18.
S.
Xu
,
S.
Wang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
C.
Li
, and
X.
Jiang
,
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
138
,
051801
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.